CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 26(04): e738-e743
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740598
Systematic Review

Rare Presentations of Frontal Sinus Fungus Ball: A Systematic Review

1   Department of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Cesumar, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
,
1   Department of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Cesumar, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
,
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
3   Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
1   Department of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Cesumar, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
3   Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
4   Academia Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica da Face (ABCPF), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction The sinus fungus ball is an agglomeration of debris and hyphae, mainly caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, within the paranasal sinus, commonly affecting a single sinus, and it only rarely affects the frontal sinus.

Objective To identify the state of the art of fungus ball in paranasal sinuses, especially related to the epidemiology of the disease in the frontal sinus. Additionally, this article reports a rare case of fungus ball in the frontal sinus in an adult male, and discusses the variables of this condition related to the patient.

Data Synthesis All of the 8 cases of fungus ball in the frontal sinus reported in this study affected male patients: 40% had unilateral disease, and 60%, bilateral disease, contrary to the incidence data of fungus ball in the other paranasal sinuses, which reports unilateral prevalence. However, in the present study, this index changes, with 50% of unilateral and 50% of bilateral incidence regarding frontal sinus involvement. The average age of the patients was 65.36 years (range: 60-74 years). The etiologic agent was Aspergillus spp., and the endonasal endoscopic therapeutic approach corresponded to 80% of cases, while frontal osteoplasty accounted for 20% of cases, reaffirming the prevalence data from other studies.

Conclusion Despite being a low-incidence entity, frontal sinus fungus ball should be considered in patients with pain in the frontal region refractory to the usual clinical treatments.



Publication History

Received: 11 February 2021

Accepted: 23 September 2021

Article published online:
27 January 2022

© 2022. Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Jun YJ, Shin JM, Lee JY, Baek BJ. Bony Changes in a Unilateral Maxillary Sinus Fungal Ball. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29 (01) e44-e47
  • 2 Bernardini E, Karligkiotis A, Fortunato S, Castelnuovo P, Dallan I. Surgical and pathogenetic considerations of frontal sinus fungus ball. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (06) 2493-2497
  • 3 Chakrabarti A, Denning DW, Ferguson BJ. et al. Fungal rhinosinusitis: a categorization and definitional schema addressing current controversies. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (09) 1809-1818
  • 4 Grosjean P, Weber R. Fungus balls of the paranasal sinuses: a review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264 (05) 461-470
  • 5 Yoon YH, Xu J, Park SK, Heo JH, Kim YM, Rha KS. A retrospective analysis of 538 sinonasal fungus ball cases treated at a single tertiary medical center in Korea (1996-2015). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017; 7 (11) 1070-1075
  • 6 Pagella F, Pusateri A, Matti E. et al. Sphenoid sinus fungus ball: our experience. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2011; 25 (04) 276-280
  • 7 Borges VB, Couto MAPG, Souza MCL, Moraes AML, Xavier MMBBS. Macro and micro-structural study on aspergillus parasiticus inoculated in peanut kernels treated with gamma radiation (Cs137). J Bioen Food Sci. 2017; 4 (01) 68-77
  • 8 Kwon-Chung KJ, Sugui JA. Aspergillus fumigatus–what makes the species a ubiquitous human fungal pathogen?. PLoS Pathog 2013; 9 (12) e1003743
  • 9 Hope WW, Petraitis V, Petraitiene R, Aghamolla T, Bacher J, Walsh TJ. The initial 96 hours of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: histopathology, comparative kinetics of galactomannan and (1->3) β-d-glucan and consequences of delayed antifungal therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54 (11) 4879-4886
  • 10 Ledderose GJ, Braun T, Betz CS, Stelter K, Leunig A. Functional endoscopic surgery of paranasal fungus ball: clinical outcome, patient benefit and health-related quality of life. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269 (10) 2203-2208
  • 11 Nicolai P, Lombardi D, Tomenzoli D. et al. Fungus ball of the paranasal sinuses: experience in 160 patients treated with endoscopic surgery. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (11) 2275-2279
  • 12 Lim HS, Yoon YH, Xu J, Kim YM, Rha KS. Isolated sphenoid sinus fungus ball: a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care referral center in Korea. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (06) 2453-2459
  • 13 Katzenstein AL, Sale SR, Greenberger PA. Allergic Aspergillus sinusitis: a newly recognized form of sinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1983; 72 (01) 89-93
  • 14 Popko M, Broglie MA, Holzmann D. Isolated fungus ball mimicking mucocele or frontal sinus tumour: a diagnostic pitfall. J Laryngol Otol 2010; 124 (10) 1111-1115
  • 15 Ho CF, Lee TJ, Wu PW. et al. Diagnosis of a maxillary sinus fungus ball without intralesional hyperdensity on computed tomography. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (05) 1041-1045
  • 16 Klossek JM, Serrano E, Péloquin L, Percodani J, Fontanel JP, Pessey JJ. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery and 109 mycetomas of paranasal sinuses. Laryngoscope 1997; 107 (01) 112-117
  • 17 Welch V, Petticrew M, Petkovic J. et al; PRISMA-Equity Bellagio group. Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 70: 68-89
  • 18 Seo MY, Lee SH, Ryu G. et al. Clinical pattern of fungal balls in the paranasal sinuses: our experience with 70 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276 (04) 1035-1038
  • 19 Wei X, Nian JB, Wang G, Zhang YL, Cai SE, Liu SZ. [Clinic characters analysis of 52 cases with sinus fungus ball disease]. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2016; 30 (22) 1754-1757 Chinese.
  • 20 Stevens MH. Aspergillosis of the frontal sinus. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104 (03) 153-156
  • 21 Dufour X, Kauffmann-Lacroix C, Ferrie JC, Goujon JM, Rodier MH, Klossek JM. Paranasal sinus fungus ball: epidemiology, clinical features and diagnosis. A retrospective analysis of 173 cases from a single medical center in France, 1989-2002. Med Mycol 2006; 44 (01) 61-67
  • 22 Milosev B, el-Mahgoub S, Aal OA, el-Hassan AM. Primary aspergilloma of paranasal sinuses in the Sudan. A review of seventeen cases. Br J Surg 1969; 56 (02) 132-137
  • 23 Tsai TL, Guo YC, Ho CY, Lin CZ. The role of ostiomeatal complex obstruction in maxillary fungus ball. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134 (03) 494-498
  • 24 Dassi CS, Demarco FR, Mangussi-Gomes J, Weber R, Balsalobre L, Stamm AC. The Frontal Sinus and Frontal Recess: Anatomical, Radiological and Surgical Concepts. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 24 (03) e364-e375
  • 25 Shin JM, Baek BJ, Byun JY, Jun YJ, Lee JY. Analysis of sinonasal anatomical variations associated with maxillary sinus fungal balls. Auris Nasus Larynx 2016; 43 (05) 524-528
  • 26 Ni Mhurchu E, Ospina J, Janjua AS, Shewchuk JR, Vertinsky AT. Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Radiological Review With Intraoperative Correlation. Can Assoc Radiol J 2017; 68 (02) 178-186
  • 27 Weber R, Draf W, Kratzsch B, Hosemann W, Schaefer SD. Modern concepts of frontal sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (01) 137-146
  • 28 Gross WE, Gross CW, Becker D, Moore D, Phillips D. Modified transnasal endoscopic Lothrop procedure as an alternative to frontal sinus obliteration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113 (04) 427-434
  • 29 Naidoo Y, Bassiouni A, Keen M, Wormald PJ. Long-term outcomes for the endoscopic modified Lothrop/Draf III procedure: a 10-year review. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (01) 43-49
  • 30 Ting JY, Wu A, Metson R. Frontal sinus drillout (modified Lothrop procedure): long-term results in 204 patients. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (05) 1066-1070
  • 31 Draf W. Endonasal Frontal Sinus Drainage Type I–III According to Draf. (eds) The Frontal Sinus. 2005. Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg:
  • 32 Turner JH, Vaezeafshar R, Hwang PH. Indications and outcomes for Draf IIB frontal sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016; 30 (01) 70-73
  • 33 Karligkiotis A, Pistochini A, Turri-Zanoni M. et al. Endoscopic endonasal orbital transposition to expand the frontal sinus approaches. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015; 29 (06) 449-456 DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4230.
  • 34 Arosio AD, Coden E, Valentini M. et al. Combined endonasal-transorbital approach to manage the far lateral frontal sinus: surgical technique Multiportal approach to frontal sinus. World Neurosurg 2021; 151: 5 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.017.