Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740283
Treatment of Comminuted Patellar Fracture: Are There Differences between Performing or Not Performing an Eversion?
Article in several languages: español | English
Abstract
Purpose To compare the clinical, functional and imaging outcomes of two surgical techniques for the treatment of comminuted patellar fractures: with and without eversion.
Methods In a retrospective series of cases of comminuted patellar fractures treated at a single center between 2014 and 2017, with a follow-up ≥ 3 months , we performed a comparison between the eversion group and the non-eversion group eversion. The exclusion criteria were partial or total patellectomy, tendon reinsertion, or incomplete rehabilitation. The variables analyzed were age, gender, smoking, diabetes mellitus, the energy of the accident, the fracture type, surgical variables (tension band, screws, wires, knots, circular cerclage), postoperative joint range of motion (ROM), presence of symptomatic osteosynthesis, the scores on the functional scales (of Tegner-Lysholm and of Kujala) at the final discharge, complications (joint stiffness, infection, deep vein thrombosis), and pre- and postoperative computed tomography imaging variables (gap, step-off > 2mm, intra-articular fixation elements).
Results In total, 20 out of 22 patients, 13 undergoing eversion and 7 not undergoing eversion, met the selection criteria.. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 12 months, and there were no statistically significant differences regarding the demographic variables between both groups, which makes them comparable. The most remarkable results were the time from admission to final discharge, of 7 months for the patients in the eversion group, and of 5 months for those in the non-eversion group (p = 0.032), the proportion of patients with a step-off > 2 mm, with 7.7% for the eversion group and 14.3% for the non-eversion group (p = 0.016), and a tendency towards higher scores in the functional scales for the eversion group.
Conclusion The treatment of comminuted patellar fractures with eversion seems to be a viable alternative, given its superior imaging and functional results compared to those of the usual technique.
Ethical Responsibilities
Protection of people and animals: the authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this research.
Confidentiality of the data: the authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.
Right to privacy and informed consent: the authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.
Publication History
Received: 04 June 2020
Accepted: 06 August 2021
Article published online:
22 December 2021
© 2021. Sociedad Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referencias
- 1 Lue TH, Feng LW, Jun WM, Yin LW. Management of comminuted patellar fracture with non-absorbable suture cerclage and Nitinol patellar concentrator. Injury 2014; 45 (12) 1974-1979 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.008.
- 2 Melvin JS, Mehta S. Patellar fractures in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (04) 198-207
- 3 Lo CY, Lui TH, Sit YK. Split fracture: a complication of cerclage wiring of acute patellar fracture. Arch Trauma Res 2014; 3 (03) e20556 DOI: 10.5812/atr.20556.
- 4 Kaufer H. Mechanical function of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 1971 Dec;53(8):1551–60. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5121795
- 5 Carpenter JE, Kasman R, Matthews LS. Fractures of the patella. JBJS Am 1993; 75: 1550-1561
- 6 Carpenter JE, Kasman RA, Patel N, Lee ML, Goldstein SA. Biomechanical evaluation of current patella fracture fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11 (05) 351-356
- 7 Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Lawrence BD, Lorich DG. Complete exposure of the articular surface for fixation of patellar fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19 (02) 118-123
- 8 Kakazu R, Archdeacon MT. Surgical Management of patellar fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2016; 47 (01) 77-83
- 9 Böstman O, Kiviluoto O, Santavirta S, Nirhamo J, Wilppula E. Fractures of the patella treated by operation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1983; 102 (02) 78-81
- 10 Petrie J, Sassoon A, Langford J. Complications of patellar fracture repair: treatment and results. J Knee Surg 2013; 26 (05) 309-312