Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(04): 856-866
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740225
Original Article

Effect of Different Ceramic Materials on Fatigue Resistance and Stress Distribution in Upper Canines with Palatal Veneers

Isabela Vitelli Tanaka
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Joao Paulo Mendes Tribst 
2   Department of Dentistry, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Lais Regiane Silva-Concilio
2   Department of Dentistry, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Marco Antonio Bottino
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate, by means of a fatigue life test, different ceramic materials used in palatal veneers to restore the canine guidance.

Materials and Methods Forty-five standardized anatomical preparations were made in extracted healthy human canines with 1.2 uniform thickness. Samples were scanned, restorations were designed and milled in polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN, Vita Enamic), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS, Vita Suprinity), and high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (YZHT, Vita YZHT). Dental preparations were etched, restorations were processed according to the manufacturers' recommendations, and adhesively cemented. Then, three samples of each group were tested with load-to-fracture to determine the fatigue parameters. In addition, the palatal veneers stresses were evaluated using numerical models through finite element analysis.

Results The mean of the monotonic test for PICN, ZLS, and YZHT was 674.18 N, 560.5 N, and 918.98 N, respectively. The StepWise test was performed until specimen fracture or until suspension of the test after 1.2 × 106 cycles. Regarding survival, using the Kaplan–Meier method, PICN presented results for the mean and median of 245.21 N and 225 N, respectively; ZLS had an average of 175.76 N and a median of 168 N, and YZHT with an average of 383.30 N and a median of 366 N. Regarding the Weibull method, PICN showed results of 5.43 β and 264 η for form and scale, respectively; ZLS had 36.14 β for form and 380.67 η for scale; and YZHT presented 4.95 β for form and 417.38 η for scale. The highest stress value was calculated for YZHT, ZLS, and PICN, respectively.

Conclusions It was possible to conclude that all tested materials have the possibility of being used for rehabilitation of upper canines' palatal surface.

Keywords

dental materials - dental veneers - fatigue - finite element analysis


Publication History

Article published online:
03 February 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Cuccia A, Caradonna C. The relationship between the stomatognathic system and body posture. Clinics (São Paulo) 2009; 64 (01) 61-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Akören AC, Karaağaçlioğlu L. Comparison of the electromyographic activity of individuals with canine guidance and group function occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22 (01) 73-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 D'Amico A. Functional occlusion of the natural teeth of man. J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11 (05) 899-915
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kulmer S, Ruzicka B, Niederwanger A, Moschen I. Incline and length of guiding elements in untreated naturally grown dentition. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26 (08) 650-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Malkoc MA, Sevimay M, Yaprak E. The use of zirconium and feldspathic porcelain in the management of the severely worn dentition: a case report. Eur J Dent 2009; 3 (01) 75-80
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Grippo JO, Simring M, Schreiner S. Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited: a new perspective on tooth surface lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135 (08) 1109-1118 , quiz 1163–1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bourdiol P, Hennequin M, Peyron MA, Woda A. Masticatory adaptation to occlusal changes. Front Physiol 2020; 11: 263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Farias-Neto A, Gomes EM, Sánchez-Ayala A, Sánchez-Ayala A, Vilanova LS. Esthetic rehabilitation of the smile with no-prep porcelain laminates and partial veneers. Case Rep Dent 2015; 2015: 452765
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Miralles R. Canine-guide occlusion and group function occlusion are equally acceptable when restoring the dentition. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2016; 16 (01) 41-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Magne P, Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104 (03) 149-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 2016; 32 (07) 908-914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dal Piva AMO, Tribst JPM, Venturini AB. et al. Survival probability of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: effect of surface condition and fatigue test load profile. Dent Mater 2020; 36 (06) 808-815
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sen N, Isler S. Microstructural, physical, and optical characterization of high-translucency zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123 (05) 761-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Borges ALS, Anami LC, Kleverlaan CJ, Bottino MA. Survival probability, Weibull characteristics, stress distribution, and fractographic analysis of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network restorations cemented on a chairside titanium base: an in vitro and in silico study. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13 (08) 1879 DOI: 10.3390/ma13081879.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ramos NdeC, Campos TM, Paz IS. et al. Microstructure characterization and SCG of newly engineered dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2016; 32 (07) 870-878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Brokos Y, Stavridakis M, Bortolotto Ibarra T, Krejci I. Evaluation of enamel thickness of upper anterior teeth in different age groups by dental cone beam computed tomography scan in vivo. InterInt J Med Rev Case Rep. 2015; 2 (23) 1396-1409
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Dal Piva A, Contreras L, Ribeiro FC. et al. Monolithic ceramics: effect of finishing techniques on surface properties, bacterial adhesion and cell viability. Oper Dent 2018; 43 (03) 315-325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Santos TDSA, Abu Hasna A, Abreu RT. et al. Fracture resistance and stress distribution of weakened teeth reinforced with a bundled glass fiber-reinforced resin post. Clin Oral Investig 2021; . Epub ahead of print DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04148-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dal Piva AMO, Tribst JPM, Benalcázar Jalkh EB, Anami LC, Bonfante EA, Bottino MA. Minimal tooth preparation for posterior monolithic ceramic crowns: effect on the mechanical behavior, reliability and translucency. Dent Mater 2021; 37 (03) e140-e150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Alves LMM, Contreras LPC, Campos TMB, Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Melo RM. In vitro wear of a zirconium-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic against different restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019; 100: 103403 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103403.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Anami LC, Lima JM, Valandro LF, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ, Bottino MA. Fatigue resistance of Y-TZP/Porcelain crowns is not influenced by the conditioning of the intaglio surface. Oper Dent 2016; 41 (01) E1-E12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Abu-Izze FO, Ramos GF, Borges ALS, Anami LC, Bottino MA. Fatigue behavior of ultrafine tabletop ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (09) 1401-1409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fennis WMM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17 (03) 313-317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sousa MP, Tribst JPM, de Oliveira Dal Piva AM, Borges ALS, de Oliveira S, da Cruz PC. Capacity to maintain placement torque at removal, single load-to-failure, and stress concentration of straight and angled abutments. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2019; 39 (02) 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Ausiello P, De Benedictis A, Bottino MA, Borges ALS. Biomechanical analysis of a custom-made mouthguard reinforced with different elastic modulus laminates during a simulated maxillofacial trauma. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2021; 14 (03) 254-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Roscoe MG, Noritomi PY, Novais VR, Soares CJ. Influence of alveolar bone loss, post type, and ferrule presence on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary canines: strain measurement and stress distribution. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 110 (02) 116-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Lo Giudice R. et al. The influence of custom-milled framework design for an implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prosthesis: 3D-FEA sudy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 (11) 4040 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17114040.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Salas MMS, Vargas-Ferreira F, Ardenghi TM, Peres KG, Huysmans MD, Demarco FF. Prevalence and associated factors of tooth erosion in 8 -12-year-old Brazilian schoolchildren. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017; 41 (05) 343-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Vered Y, Lussi A, Zini A, Gleitman J, Sgan-Cohen HD. Dental erosive wear assessment among adolescents and adults utilizing the basic erosive wear examination (BEWE) scoring system. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18 (08) 1985-1990
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Vailati F. Composite palatal veneers to restore a case of severe dental erosion, from minimally to non invasive dentistry: a 5-year follow-up case report. It. J. Dent. Med. 2017; 2 (01) 24-34
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Vailati F, Vaglio G, Belser UC. Full-mouth minimally invasive adhesive rehabilitation to treat severe dental erosion: a case report. J Adhes Dent 2012; 14 (01) 83-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Muts EJ, van Pelt H, Edelhoff D, Krejci I, Cune M. Tooth wear: a systematic review of treatment options. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112 (04) 752-759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Dal Piva AMO, Tribst JPM, Werner A, Anami LC, Bottino MA, Kleverlaan CJ. Three-body wear effect on different CAD/CAM ceramics staining durability. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2020; 103: 103579 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103579.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Nishioka G, Prochnow C, Firmino A. et al. Fatigue strength of several dental ceramics indicated for CAD-CAM monolithic restorations. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32: e53 DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0053.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tinschert J, Schulze KA, Natt G, Latzke P, Heussen N, Spiekermann H. Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21 (03) 217-222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Altan B, Cinar S, Tuncelli B. Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia-based monolithic CAD-CAM materials to resin cement after different surface treatments. Niger J Clin Pract 2019; 22 (11) 1475-1482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Penteado MM, Mendes Tribst JP, Dal Piva AMO, Archangelo KC, Bottino MA, Souto Borges AL. Influence of different restorative material and cement on the stress distribution of ceramic veneer in upper central incisor. Indian J Dent Res 2020; 31 (02) 236-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Mauderli A, Lundeen HC, Walsh EK. Limits of human bite strength. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56 (02) 226-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW. The effect of pressure on a maximum incisal bite force in man. Arch Oral Biol 1997; 42 (01) 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Preis V, Grumser K, Schneider-Feyrer S, Behr M, Rosentritt M. Cycle-dependent in vitro wear performance of dental ceramics after clinical surface treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016; 53: 49-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Venturini AB, Bohrer TC, Fontana PE, Fröhlich TT, May LG, Valandro LF. Step-stress vs. staircase fatigue tests to evaluate the effect of intaglio adjustment on the fatigue behavior of simplified lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021; 113: 104091 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104091.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Gonzaga CC, Cesar PF, Miranda Jr WG, Yoshimura HN. Slow crack growth and reliability of dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2011; 27 (04) 394-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Melo RM, Pereira C, Ramos NC. et al. Effect of pH variation on the subcritical crack growth parameters of glassy matrix ceramics. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 2019; 16 (06) 2449-2456
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Monteiro JB, Riquieri H, Prochnow C. et al. Fatigue failure load of two resin-bonded zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics: effect of ceramic thickness. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (06) 891-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Penteado MM, Borges ALS, Bottino MA. Influence of ceramic material, thickness of restoration and cement layer on stress distribution of occlusal veneers. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32: e118 DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0118.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Meirelles LCF, Pierre FZ, Tribst JPM, Pagani C, Bresciani E, Borges ALS. Influence of preparation design, restorative material and load direction on the stress distribution of ceramic veneer in upper central incisor. Braz Dent Sci 2021;24(03):
    Google Scholar