CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2022; 55(01): 018-025
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740085
Meta-analysis

Primary Prevention of Cancer-Related Lymphedema Using Preventive Lymphatic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Pedro Ciudad
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, Arzobispo Loayza National Hospital, Lima, Peru
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
3   Academic Department of Surgery. School of Medicine Hipolito Unanue. Federico Villarreal National University, Lima, Perú
,
Joseph M. Escandón
4   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States
,
Valeria P. Bustos
5   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Oscar J. Manrique
4   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States
,
Juste Kaciulyte
6   Department of Surgery “P.Valdoni,” Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Funding None of the authors received any funds or has any financial interests to disclose for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Abstract

Background Several studies have proven prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) performed after lymphadenectomy can potentially reduce the risk of cancer-related lymphedema (CRL) without compromising the oncological treatment. We present a systematic review of the current evidence on the primary prevention of CRL using preventive lymphatic surgery (PLS).

Patients and Methods A comprehensive search across PubMed, Cochrane-EBMR, Web of Science, Ovid Medline (R) and in-process, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect was performed through December 2020. A meta-analysis with a random-effect method was accomplished.

Results Twenty-four studies including 1547 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, 830 prophylactic LVA procedures were performed after oncological treatment, of which 61 developed lymphedema.

The pooled cumulative rate of upper extremity lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and PLS was 5.15% (95% CI, 2.9%–7.5%; p < 0.01). The pooled cumulative rate of lower extremity lymphedema after oncological surgical treatment and PLS was 6.66% (95% CI < 1–13.4%, p-value = 0.5). Pooled analysis showed that PLS reduced the incidence of upper and lower limb lymphedema after lymph node dissection by 18.7 per 100 patients treated (risk difference [RD] – 18.7%, 95% CI – 29.5% to – 7.9%; p < 0.001) and by 30.3 per 100 patients treated (RD – 30.3%, 95% CI – 46.5% to – 14%; p < 0.001), respectively, versus no prophylactic lymphatic reconstruction.

Conclusions Low-quality studies and a high risk of bias halt the formulating of strong recommendations in favor of PLS, despite preliminary reports theoretically indicating that the inclusion of PLS may significantly decrease the incidence of CRL.

Ethical Statement

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
25 February 2022

© 2022. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Ciudad P, Sabbagh MD, Agko M. et al. Surgical management of lower extremity lymphedema: a comprehensive review. Indian J Plast Surg 2019; 52 (01) 81-92
  • 2 Ghanta S, Cuzzone DA, Torrisi JS. et al. Regulation of inflammation and fibrosis by macrophages in lymphedema. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2015; 308 (09) H1065-H1077
  • 3 Kung TA, Champaneria MC, Maki JH, Neligan PC. Current concepts in the surgical management of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (04) 1003e-1013e
  • 4 Benoit L, Boichot C, Cheynel N. et al. Preventing lymphedema and morbidity with an omentum flap after ilioinguinal lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12 (10) 793-799
  • 5 Boccardo F, Valenzano M, Costantini S. et al. LYMPHA technique to prevent secondary lower limb lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (11) 3558-3563
  • 6 Leung EYL, Tirlapur SA, Meads C. The management of secondary lower limb lymphoedema in cancer patients: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2015; 29 (02) 112-119
  • 7 Gilbert A, O'Brien BMC, Vorrath JW, Sykes PJ. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis by microvascular technique. Br J Plast Surg 1976; 29 (04) 355-360
  • 8 Forte AJ, Khan N, Huayllani MT. et al. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis for lower extremity lymphedema: a systematic review. Indian J Plast Surg 2020; 53 (01) 17-24
  • 9 Laine JB, Howard JM. Experimental lymphatico-venous anastomosis. Surg Forum 1963; 14 (14) 111-112
  • 10 Ciudad P, Agko M, Huang TCT. et al. Comprehensive multimodal surgical treatment of end-stage lower extremity lymphedema with toe management: The combined Charles,' Homan's, and vascularized lymph node transfer (CHAHOVA) procedures. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119 (04) 430-438
  • 11 Ciudad P, Manrique OJ, Bustos SS. et al. Single-stage VASER-assisted liposuction and lymphatico-venous anastomoses for the treatment of extremity lymphedema: a case series and systematic review of the literature. Gland Surg 2020; 9 (02) 545-557
  • 12 Laredo J, Lee BB. Lymphedema. In: Mowatt-Larssen E, Desai SS, Dua A, Shortell CE. eds. Phlebology, Vein Surgery and Ultrasonography: Diagnosis and Management of Venous Disease. 1st ed.. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2014: 327-340
  • 13 Manrique OJ, Bustos SS, Ciudad P. et al. Overview of lymphedema for physicians and other clinicians: a review of fundamental concepts. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; x: x
  • 14 Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F. et al. Lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA) for primary surgical prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: over 4 years follow-up. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (06) 421-424
  • 15 Campisi CC, Ryan M, Boccardo F, Campisi C. LyMPHA and the prevention of lymphatic injuries: a rationale for early microsurgical intervention. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (01) 71-72
  • 16 Jørgensen MG, Toyserkani NM, Sørensen JA. The effect of prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis and shunts for preventing cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (05) 576-585
  • 17 Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M. et al; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015; 350: g7647
  • 18 Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M. et al; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 4 (01) 1
  • 19 Simeonsson RJ. Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention in early intervention. J Early Interv 1991; 15 (02) 124-134
  • 20 Pigeot I, De Henauw S, Foraita R, Jahn I, Ahrens W. Primary prevention from the epidemiology perspective: three examples from the practice. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 10
  • 21 Durieux N, Vandenput S, Pasleau F. Médecine factuelle: la hiérarchisation des preuves par le Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine d'oOford [OCEBM levels of evidence system]. Rev Med Liege 2013; 68 (12) 644-649
  • 22 Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019
  • 23 Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. et al; Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343 (7829): d5928
  • 24 Borges Migliavaca C, Stein C, Colpani V, Barker TH, Munn Z, Falavigna M. Prevalence Estimates Reviews – Systematic Review Methodology Group (PERSyst). How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20 (01) 96
  • 25 R Core Development Team. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.0) [Computer Software]. Accessed September 14, 2021 at: https://cran.r-project.org
  • 26 The Jamovi Project. Jamovi (Version 1.6) [Computer Software]. Accessed September 14, 2021 at: https://www.jamovi.org
  • 27 Viechtubauer W. Conducting Meta-Analysis in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010; 36: 1-48
  • 28 IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 25
  • 29 Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 2011; 342: d549
  • 30 Bonett DG, Price RM. Meta-analysis methods for risk differences. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2014; 67 (03) 371-387
  • 31 Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019: 241-280
  • 32 Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315 (7109): 629-634
  • 33 Feldman S, Bansil H, Ascherman J. et al. Single institution experience with lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) for the primary prevention of lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (10) 3296-3301
  • 34 Agrawal J, Mehta S, Goel A, Pande PK, Kumar K. Lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA) for prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema-A preliminary report. Indian J Surg Oncol 2018; 9 (03) 369-373
  • 35 Hahamoff M, Gupta N, Munoz D. et al. A lymphedema surveillance program for breast cancer patients reveals the promise of surgical prevention. J Surg Res 2019; 244: 604-611
  • 36 Ozmen T, Lazaro M, Zhou Y, Vinyard A, Avisar E. Evaluation of simplified lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (S-Lympha) for the prevention of breast cancer–related clinical lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection. Ann Surg 2019; 270 (06) 1156-1160
  • 37 Cakmakoglu C, Kwiecien GJ, Schwarz GS, Gastman B. Lymphaticovenous bypass for immediate lymphatic reconstruction in locoregional advanced melanoma patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 247-252
  • 38 Ezawa M, Sasaki H, Yamada K. et al. Long term outcomes from lymphatic venous anastomosis after total hysterectomy to prevent postoperative lymphedema in lower limb. BMC Surg 2019; 19 (01) 177
  • 39 Nacchiero E, Maruccia M, Vestita M, Elia R, Marannino P, Giudice G. Multiple lymphatic-venous anastomoses in reducing the risk of lymphedema in melanoma patients undergoing complete lymph node dissection. A retrospective case-control study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (04) 642-648
  • 40 Johnson AR, Fleishman A, Tran BNN. et al. Developing a lymphatic surgery program: a first-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (06) 975e-985e
  • 41 Schwarz GS, Grobmyer SR, Djohan RS. et al. Axillary reverse mapping and lymphaticovenous bypass: Lymphedema prevention through enhanced lymphatic visualization and restoration of flow. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120 (02) 160-167
  • 42 Cook JA, Sasor SE, Loewenstein SN. et al. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction after axillary lymphadenectomy: a single-institution early experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28 (03) 1381-1387
  • 43 Orefice S, Conti AR, Grassi M, Salvadori B. The use of lympho-venous anastomoses to prevent complications from ilio-inguinal dissection. Tumori 1988; 74 (03) 347-351
  • 44 Shaffer K, Cakmakoglu C, Schwarz GS. et al. Lymphedema prevention surgery: improved operating efficiency over time. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (12) 4695-4701
  • 45 Somashekhar S, Ashok B, Rohit Kumar C, Zaveri S, Ashwin K. Lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) - Lending a helping hand for prevention of enlarging arm. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (12) 231-671
  • 46 Levy AS, Peysakhovich A, Taback B, Ascherman JA, Rohde CH. Lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) for the primary prevention of lymphedema: a 3-year follow-up matched cohort study. Am Assoc Hand Surg 2020; 22 (06) 3296
  • 47 Scaglioni MF, Meroni M, Fritsche E, Fuchs B. Combined pedicled superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap with lymphatic tissue preservation and lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) for defect reconstruction and lymphedema-lymphocele prevention in thigh sarcoma surgery: Preliminary results. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123 (01) 96-103
  • 48 Takeishi M, Kojima M, Mori K, Kurihara K, Sasaki H. Primary intrapelvic lymphaticovenular anastomosis following lymph node dissection. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (03) 300-304
  • 49 Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F. et al. Lymphedema microsurgical preventive healing approach: a new technique for primary prevention of arm lymphedema after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (03) 703-708
  • 50 Casabona F, Bogliolo S, Valenzano Menada M, Sala P, Villa G, Ferrero S. Feasibility of axillary reverse mapping during sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (09) 2459-2463
  • 51 Boccardo FM, Casabona F, Friedman D. et al. Surgical prevention of arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (09) 2500-2505
  • 52 Boccardo F, De Cian F, Campisi CC. et al. Surgical prevention and treatment of lymphedema after lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Lymphology 2013; 46 (01) 20-26
  • 53 Morotti M, Menada MV, Boccardo F. et al. Lymphedema microsurgical preventive healing approach for primary prevention of lower limb lymphedema after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy for vulvar cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013; 23 (04) 769-774
  • 54 Campisi CC, Campisi CA, Boccardo F, Ryan M. Microsurgery for prevention and early treatment of lymphatic disorders after nodal dissection. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219 (Suppl. 04) E198
  • 55 Cormier JN, Askew RL, Mungovan KS, Xing Y, Ross MI, Armer JM. Lymphedema beyond breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer-related secondary lymphedema. Cancer 2010; 116 (22) 5138-5149
  • 56 Rodriguez JR, Fuse Y, Yamamoto T. Microsurgical strategies for prophylaxis of cancer-related extremity lymphedema: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 471-479
  • 57 Johnson AR, Kimball S, Epstein S. et al. Lymphedema incidence after axillary lymph node dissection: quantifying the impact of radiation and the lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 82 (4S, Suppl 3) S234-S241
  • 58 Ribeiro Pereira ACP, Koifman RJ, Bergmann A. Incidence and risk factors of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment: 10 years of follow-up. Breast 2017; 36: 67-73
  • 59 Ochoa D, Korourian S, Boneti C, Adkins L, Badgwell B, Klimberg VS. Axillary reverse mapping: five-year experience. Surgery 2014; 156 (05) 1261-1268
  • 60 Tummel E, Ochoa D, Korourian S. et al. Does axillary reverse mapping prevent lymphedema after lymphadenectomy?. Ann Surg 2017; 265 (05) 987-992
  • 61 Yue T, Zhuang D, Zhou P. et al. A prospective study to assess the feasibility of axillary reverse mapping and evaluate its effect on preventing lymphedema in breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer 2015; 15 (04) 301-306
  • 62 Hyngstrom JR, Chiang YJ, Cromwell KD. et al. Prospective assessment of lymphedema incidence and lymphedema-associated symptoms following lymph node surgery for melanoma. Melanoma Res 2013; 23 (04) 290-297
  • 63 Huang J, Yu N, Wang X, Long X. Incidence of lower limb lymphedema after vulvar cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (46) e8722
  • 64 Liang Z-Y, Long X, Yu N-Z, Huang J-Z. Diagnostic workup of lymphedema. Plast Aesthetic Res 2019; 6 (23) 3-9
  • 65 Forte AJ, Boczar D, Huayllani MT, Lu X, Ciudad P. Lymphoscintigraphy for evaluation of lymphedema treatment: a systematic review. Cureus 2019; 11 (12) e6363
  • 66 Petrek JA, Senie RT, Peters M, Rosen PP. Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis. Cancer 2001; 92 (06) 1368-1377
  • 67 Johansson K, Branje E. Arm lymphoedema in a cohort of breast cancer survivors 10 years after diagnosis. Acta Oncol 2010; 49 (02) 166-173
  • 68 Rosian K, Stanak M. Efficacy and safety assessment of lymphovenous anastomosis in patients with primary and secondary lymphoedema: A systematic review of prospective evidence. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (08) 763-772
  • 69 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML. et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (02) 187-196
  • 70 Squitieri L, Rasmussen PW, Patel KM. An economic analysis of prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis among breast cancer patients receiving mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121 (08) 1175-1178
  • 71 Johnson AR, Asban A, Granoff MD. et al. Is immediate lymphatic reconstruction cost-effective?. Ann Surg 2019; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003746.
  • 72 Alexander PE, Brito JP, Neumann I. et al. World Health Organization strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence (study quality) are frequent and often inconsistent with GRADE guidance. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 72: 98-106
  • 73 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). Appendix A: How the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Grades Its Recommendations. In: The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services 2012: Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Accessed September 14, 2021 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115122/
  • 74 Gentileschi S, Servillo M, Garganese G. et al. The lymphatic superficial circumflex iliac vessels deep branch perforator flap: A new preventive approach to lower limb lymphedema after groin dissection-preliminary evidence. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (06) 564-573
  • 75 Rosenthal R, Kasenda B, Dell-Kuster S. et al. Completion and publication rates of randomized controlled trials in surgery: An empirical study. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (01) 68-73