Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739462
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Attitudes of Gynecologic Patients: Experience in a Tertiary Clinic
Atitudes de pacientes ginecológicos em medicina alternativa e complementar: Experiência em uma clínica terciária
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding complementary and alternative medicine methods of patients who were admitted to gynecology outpatient clinics.
Methods In the present survey, a questionnaire on complementary and alternative medicine practices was applied on 1,000 women (ages between 18 and 83 years old) who were admitted to the gynecology outpatient clinic of a tertiary maternity hospital. Demographic features and knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors about these methods were inquired in face-to-face interviews.
Results While 80.7% of the total participants thought that complementary and alternative medicine was beneficial, only 37.5% of them had used these methods previously. The rate of prior knowledge on this subject was of 59.7% and the source of information was physicians for 8.5% of the patients. However, 72.4% of all participants wanted to obtain information on these methods and 93.7% wanted to be informed by physicians. In the decision tree model, having knowledge about complementary and alternative medicine was the most effective factor determining its use (p < 0.001). Phytotherapy was found to be the most used method, with 91.4%. The most preferred plant was onion (18.9%), and the most common reasons for herbal use were stress (15.4%) and fatigue (15.2%).
Conclusion More than one-third of the patients who applied to the gynecology outpatient clinics used one of the complementary and alternative medicine methods at least once. As gynecologists and obstetricians, we need to be more knowledgeable about these methods to provide correct guidance to our patients for accessing accurate and effective information.
Resumo
Objetivo Avaliar o conhecimento, as atitudes e os comportamentos em relação aos métodos de medicina complementar e alternativa de pacientes internadas em ambulatórios de ginecologia.
Métodos Na presente pesquisa, um questionário sobre práticas de medicina complementar e alternativa foi aplicado a 1.000 mulheres (idades entre 18 e 83 anos) que foram admitidas nos ambulatórios de ginecologia de uma maternidade terciária. Características demográficas e conhecimento, atitudes e comportamentos sobre esses métodos foram investigados em entrevistas pessoais.
Resultados Enquanto 80,7% do total de participantes achavam que a medicina complementar e alternativa era benéfica, apenas 37,5% deles haviam usado esses métodos anteriormente. A taxa de conhecimento prévio sobre o assunto foi de 59,7% e a fonte de informação foi médica para 8,5% dos pacientes. No entanto, 72,4% de todos os participantes queriam obter informações sobre esses métodos e 93,7% queriam ser informados por médicos. No modelo de árvore de decisão, ter conhecimento sobre medicina complementar e alternativa foi o fator mais eficaz para determinar seu uso (p < 0,001). A fitoterapia foi o método mais utilizado, com 91,4%. A planta preferida foi a cebola (18,9%), e os motivos mais comuns para o uso de ervas foram estresse (15,4%) e fadiga (15,2%).
Conclusão Mais de um terço das pacientes que se inscreveram no ambulatório de ginecologia utilizaram um dos métodos de medicina complementar e alternativa pelo menos uma vez. Como ginecologistas e obstetras, precisamos ter mais conhecimento sobre estes métodos a fim de fornecer orientações corretas aos nossos pacientes para o acesso a informações precisas e eficazes.
Contributions
Yorgancı A., Öztürk U. K. and Bozkurt O. E. researched the literature, conceived the study, and were involved in protocol development. Öztürk U. K. was involved in patient recruitment. Akyol M. conducted the statistical analysis of the data. Yorgancı A. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Bozkurt O. E. and Pay R. E. reviewed and edited the manuscript. Engin-Ustun Y. made a critical revision of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Publication History
Received: 13 November 2020
Accepted: 15 September 2021
Article published online:
06 December 2021
© 2021. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Ernst E, Cassileth BR. The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review. Cancer 1998; 83 (04) 777-782
- 2 Harris PE, Cooper KL, Relton C, Thomas KJ. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. Int J Clin Pract 2012; 66 (10) 924-939
- 3 Kav S, Hanoğlu Z, Algier L. Türkiye'de kanserli hastalarda tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tedavi yöntemlerinin kullanımı: literatür taraması. Uluslararası Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi 2008; 18 (01) 32-38
- 4 National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). Expanding horizons of healthcare: five-year strategic plan 2001–2005. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000 (NIH Publication No. 01–5001).
- 5 Angell M, Kassirer JP. Alternative medicine–the risks of untested and unregulated remedies. N Engl J Med 1998; 339 (12) 839-841
- 6 Brigden ML. Unproven cancer therapies: a multi-headed hydra. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 1998; 31: 9-14
- 7 Hunt KJ, Coelho HF, Wider B, Perry R, Hung SK, Terry R. et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use in England: results from a national survey. Int J Clin Pract 2010; 64 (11) 1496-1502
- 8 Neiberg RH, Aickin M, Grzywacz JG, Lang W, Quandt SA, Bell RA. et al. Occurrence and co-occurrence of types of complementary and alternative medicine use by age, gender, ethnicity, and education among adults in the United States: the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). J Altern Complement Med 2011; 17 (04) 363-370
- 9 Yates JS, Mustian KM, Morrow GR, Gillies LJ, Padmanaban D, Atkins JN. et al. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer patients during treatment. Support Care Cancer 2005; 13 (10) 806-811
- 10 Kemppainen LM, Kemppainen TT, Reippainen JA, Salmenniemi ST, Vuolanto PH. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe: Health-related and sociodemographic determinants. Scand J Public Health 2018; 46 (04) 448-455
- 11 Misawa J, Ichikawa R, Shibuya A, Maeda Y, Hishiki T, Kondo Y. Social determinants affecting the use of complementary and alternative medicine in Japan: An analysis using the conceptual framework of social determinants of health. PLoS One 2018; 13 (07) e0200578
- 12 Sarris J, Robins Wahlin TB, Goncalves DC, Byrne GJ. Comparative use of complementary medicine, allied health, and manual therapies by middle-aged and older Australian women. J Women Aging 2010; 22 (04) 273-282
- 13 Tam KF, Cheng DK, Ng TY, Ngan HY. The behaviors of seeking a second opinion from other health-care professionals and the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine in gynecologic cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2005; 13 (09) 679-684
- 14 Ernst EE. Complementary/alternative medicine in gynecology: no simple messages please!. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82 (04) 391-392
- 15 Pallivalapila AR, Stewart D, Shetty A, Pande B, Singh R, McLay JS. Use of complementary and alternative medicines during the third trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (01) 204-211
- 16 Swisher EM, Cohn DE, Goff BA, Parham J, Herzog TJ, Rader JS. et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among women with gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 84 (03) 363-367
- 17 Zeller T, Muenstedt K, Stoll C, Schweder J, Senf B, Ruckhaeberle E. et al. Potential interactions of complementary and alternative medicine with cancer therapy in outpatients with gynecological cancer in a comprehensive cancer center. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2013; 139 (03) 357-365
- 18 Akpunar D, Bebis H, Yavan T. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with gynecologic cancer: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16 (17) 7847-7852
- 19 Biro FM, Bloemer NL. “Complementary medicine”: complementary and alternative health approaches in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2019; 32 (01) 3-6
- 20 Furlow ML, Patel DA, Sen A, Liu JR. Physician and patient attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine in obstetrics and gynecology. BMC Complement Altern Med 2008; 8: 35
- 21 Yildirim Y, Tinar S, Yorgun S, Toz E, Kaya B, Sonmez S. et al. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies by Turkish women with gynecological cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006; 27 (01) 81-85
- 22 Mazicioglu MM, Serin MS, Sahan H. Attitude of patients with gynaecologic malignancies in selecting alternative and complementary therapies. Middle East J Fam Med 2006; 4 (02) 12-15
- 23 Nazik E, Nazik H, Api M, Kale A, Aksu M. Complementary and alternative medicine use by gynecologic oncology patients in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012; 13 (01) 21-25
- 24 Gökşin İ, Duru Aşiret G, Kütmeç Yılmaz C. Usage of complementary and alternative medicine in women with urinary incontinence at a hospital in Turkey. Integr Med Res 2020; 9 (02) 100403
- 25 Yamashita H, Tsukayama H, Sugishita C. Popularity of complementary and alternative medicine in Japan: a telephone survey. Complement Ther Med 2002; 10 (02) 84-93
- 26 Münstedt K, Maisch M, Tinneberg HR, Hübner J. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in obstetrics and gynaecology: a survey of office-based obstetricians and gynaecologists regarding attitudes towards CAM, its provision and cooperation with other CAM providers in the state of Hesse, Germany. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290 (06) 1133-1139
- 27 Sirois FM, Salamonsen A, Kristoffersen AE. Reasons for continuing use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in students: a consumer commitment model. BMC Complement Altern Med 2016; 16: 75
- 28 Griffiths G, Trueman L, Crowther T, Thomas B, Smith B. Onions–a global benefit to health. Phytother Res 2002; 16 (07) 603-615
- 29 Aksu MG, Bozcuk HS, Korcum AF. Effect of complementary and alternative medicine during radiotherapy on radiation toxicity. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16 (04) 415-419
- 30 Low Dog T. The use of botanicals during pregnancy and lactation. Altern Ther Health Med 2009; 15 (01) 54-58
- 31 Samarakoon DNAW, Uluwaduge DI, Siriwardhene MA. Mechanisms of action of Sri Lankan herbal medicines used in the treatment of diabetes: A review. J Integr Med 2020; 18 (01) 14-20
- 32 Arslan E, Sayin S, Demirbas S, Cakar M, Somak NG, Yesilkaya S. et al. A case study report of acute renal failure associated with Nigella sativa in a diabetic patient. J Integr Med 2013; 11 (01) 64-66