Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Surg J (N Y) 2021; 07(04): e342-e346
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736668
Case Report

Dynamic Facial Reanimation in an Overweight Patient and with Significant Comorbidities: An Objective Analysis of Labbè Technique

Ricardo Horta 
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, and Burn Unity, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal
,
Francisca Frias
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, and Burn Unity, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal
,
Diogo Barreiro
1   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, and Burn Unity, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal
,
Ana Gerós
2   FEUP - Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, INEB - Instituto Nacional de Engenharia Biomédica, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal
,
Paulo Aguiar
3   FMUP - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, INEB - Instituto Nacional de Engenharia Biomédica, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Gracilis free muscle transfer is considered the gold standard technique for facial reanimation in cases of facial palsy. However, it is limited by its long operative and recovery times, the need for a second surgical site, and its outcomes that can sometimes show midfacial bulk and oral commissure malposition. Facial reanimation with lengthening temporalis myoplasty (LTM)—Labbé technique— carries the advantage of having a shorter surgical time, a faster recovery, and being a less invasive surgery. Almost all patients included in studies of LTM were evaluated by subjective methods, and very little quantifiable data was available. A 64-year-old woman presented with long-standing incomplete right facial palsy secondary to acoustic neuroma surgery. Since she was overweight (body mass index [BMI]: 43.9) and had several cardiovascular comorbidities (hypertension, dyslipidemia), she was not a good candidate for gracilis free muscle transfer. She was submitted to facial reanimation with LTM. Fourteen months after surgery, she presented excellent facial symmetry, both at rest and in contraction, while smiling. She was evaluated with the Facegram-3D, a technology that we have developed for dynamic evaluation of facial muscle contraction. The analysis showed symmetry at rest and contraction, according to Terzis and Noah. Regarding vertical and horizontal displacement, the postoperative movement was synchronized and with less fluctuations when compared with the preoperative period. Notably, the anatomical pair's trajectories were smoother. Similar velocity profiles were found between anatomical pairs, with less abrupt changes in velocity values, further supporting improved movement control. Comparing the symmetry index, which takes a theoretical maximum of 1.0 for perfect 3D symmetry, its value was 0.56 for the commissures and 0.5 for the midpoints in the preoperative period, having improved to 0.91 and 0.82, respectively, 3 months postoperatively. Good aesthetic and functional results were achieved using the Labbè technique. LTM is a good option in cases of long-standing facial paralysis, if the patient desires a single-stage procedure with almost immediate dynamic function. Moreover, this technique assumes extreme importance in facial reanimation of patients of advanced age, overweight, or those who have several comorbidities.

Keywords

facial palsy - facial reanimation - labbè technique - overweight patient

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.




Publication History

Received: 20 July 2021

Accepted: 24 August 2021

Article published online:
15 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Fu L, Bundy C, Sadiq SA. Psychological distress in people with disfigurement from facial palsy. Eye (Lond) 2011; 25 (10) 1322-1326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Horta R, Correia-Sá I, Nascimento R, Silva A, Amarante J. Correction of residual static and dynamic labial deviations in a paralyzed face after free gracilis muscle transplantation. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (08) 2143-2145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Greene JJ, Tavares J, Guarin DL, Jowett N, Hadlock T. Surgical refinement following free gracilis transfer for smile reanimation. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 81 (03) 329-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Oyer SL, Nellis J, Ishii LE, Boahene KD, Byrne PJ. Comparison of objective outcomes in dynamic lower facial reanimation with temporalis tendon and gracilis free muscle transfer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 144 (12) 1162-1168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Byrne PJ, Kim M, Boahene K, Millar J, Moe K. Temporalis tendon transfer as part of a comprehensive approach to facial reanimation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (04) 234-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gerós A, Horta R, Aguiar P. Facegram - Objective quantitative analysis in facial reconstructive surgery. J Biomed Inform 2016; 61: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Horta R, Nascimento R, Gerós A, Aguiar P, Silva A, Amarante J. A novel system for assessing facial muscle movements: the Facegram 3D. Surg Innov 2018; 25 (01) 90-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Boahene KD. Dynamic muscle transfer in facial reanimation. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (02) 204-210
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bae YC, Zuker RM, Manktelow RT, Wade S. A comparison of commissure excursion following gracilis muscle transplantation for facial paralysis using a cross-face nerve graft versus the motor nerve to the masseter nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2407-2413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bos R, Reddy SG, Mommaerts MY. Lengthening temporalis myoplasty versus free muscle transfer with the gracilis flap for long-standing facial paralysis: A systematic review of outcomes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44 (08) 940-951
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Veyssière A, Labbé D, Bénateau H. Lengthening temporalis myoplasty and facial paralysis from birth. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (03) 312-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hayashi A, Labbé D, Natori Y. et al. Experience and anatomical study of modified lengthening temporalis myoplasty for established facial paralysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (01) 63-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hontanilla B, Marre D, Cabello I. Facial Reanimation with Gracilis Muscle Transfer Neurotized to Cross-Facial Nerve Graft versus Masseteric Nerve: a comparative study using the FACIAL CLIMA evaluating system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (06) 1241-1252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Guerreschi P, Labbé D. [Lengthening temporalis myoplasty: technical refinements]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2015; 60 (05) 393-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Choi JY, Kim HJ, Moon SY. Management of the paralyzed face using temporalis tendon transfer via intraoral and transcutaneous approach: Temporalis tendon transfer. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 40 (01) 24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Askar SM, Mohammed NN, Elibiary HA. A modified technique of transposition of temporalis muscle in selected cases of longstanding facial paralysis. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (01) e1-e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar