Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(02): 437-442
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735932
Original Article

The Efficiency of a Learning Software Compared to e-Books in Dental Education

Philipp Luhrenberg‡   #
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
,
Roman Kia Rahimi-Nedjat‡   #
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
,
Kawe Sagheb
2   Department of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
,
Keyvan Sagheb
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
,
Bilal Al-Nawas
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Due to time-consuming curricular and extracurricular activities, students in dentistry and medicine can profit from efficient learning strategies. One strategy could be the preparation with individually designed educational software that embed different multimedia sources. The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of such a program compared with an e-book similar to a traditional textbook.

Materials and Methods Dentistry students of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz passed an entrance multiple-choice test on the topic of odontogenic tumors and were then randomized into two groups. Afterward, both groups had 14 days to study on the topic of odontogenic tumors either with a learning software or an e-book. A final exam was then taken and the two groups were compared.

Statistical Analysis A least significant difference post hoc analysis comparing the group average values was performed. The level of significance was p <0.05.

Results Seventy-one students took part in the study. While students from the first and second clinical semester showed significantly better results and improvements with the e-book, an opposite effect was observed in students from the third and fifth clinical semester with significantly better results and improvements with the software.

Conclusion Depending on the clinical experience and knowledge, a multimedia educational software can help students in dentistry to enhance efficiency in the preparation for exams.

Keywords

dental education - e-learning - computer-based learning - learning style

Note

The ethics committee Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany approved this study (2018-13345-epidemiology).


# These authors contributed equally to this study.




Publication History

Article published online:
14 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Tolks DRB, Ehlers J, Kuhn S. et al. The online inverted classroom model (oICM). A blueprint to adapt the inverted classroom to an online learning setting in medical and health education. MedEdPublish 2020; 9 (01) 113
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Charles B, Hodges SM, Barbara B. Lockee, Torrey Trust, and M. Aaron Bond. The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning; 2020
    PubMed
  • 3 Faraone KL, Garrett PH, Romberg E. A blended learning approach to teaching pre-clinical complete denture prosthodontics. Eur J Dent Educ 2013; 17 (01) e22-e27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Jham BC, Duraes GV, Strassler HE, Sensi LG. Joining the podcast revolution. J Dent Educ 2008; 72 (03) 278-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ 2006; 6: 41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bains M, Reynolds PA, McDonald F, Sherriff M. Effectiveness and acceptability of face-to-face, blended and e-learning: a randomised trial of orthodontic undergraduates. Eur J Dent Educ 2011; 15 (02) 110-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Triola MM, Huwendiek S, Levinson AJ, Cook DA. New directions in e-learning research in health professions education: report of two symposia. Med Teach 2012; 34 (01) e15-e20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lotfi M, Hamblin MR, Rezaei N. COVID-19: Transmission, prevention, and potential therapeutic opportunities. Clin Chim Acta 2020; 508: 254-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Aly M, Elen J, Willems G. Instructional multimedia program versus standard lecture: a comparison of two methods for teaching the undergraduate orthodontic curriculum. Eur J Dent Educ 2004; 8 (01) 43-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Woelber JP, Hilbert TS, Ratka-Krüger P. Can easy-to-use software deliver effective e-learning in dental education? A randomised controlled study. Eur J Dent Educ 2012; 16 (03) 187-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fleming ND. VARK - a guide to learning styles. Accessed 2021 at: http://vark-learn.com/
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Nasiri Z, Gharekhani S, Ghasempour M. Relationship between learning style and academic status of babol dental students. Electron Physician 2016; 8 (05) 2340-2345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mozaffari HR, Janatolmakan M, Sharifi R, Ghandinejad F, Andayeshgar B, Khatony A. The relationship between the VARK learning styles and academic achievement in dental students. Adv Med Educ Pract 2020; 11: 15-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 AlQahtani N, AlMoammar K, Taher S, AlBarakati S, AlKofide E. Learning preferences among dental students using the VARK questionnaire: a comparison between different academic levels and gender. J Pak Med Assoc 2018; 68 (01) 59-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Aldosari MA, Aljabaa AH, Al-Sehaibany FS, Albarakati SF. Learning style preferences of dental students at a single institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, evaluated using the VARK questionnaire. Adv Med Educ Pract 2018; 9: 179-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mukherjee D, Das C, Chatterjee P. Odontogenic tumours of jaw: a prospective study on clinico-pathological profile and their management. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 69 (02) 181-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jing W, Xuan M, Lin Y. et al. Odontogenic tumours: a retrospective study of 1642 cases in a Chinese population. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36 (01) 20-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kolcu MİB, Öztürkçü ÖSK, Kaki GD. Evaluation of a distance education course using the 4C-ID model for continuing endodontics education. J Dent Educ 2020; 84 (01) 62-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Moazami F, Bahrampour E, Azar MR, Jahedi F, Moattari M. Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14: 45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Soltanimehr E, Bahrampour E, Imani MM, Rahimi F, Almasi B, Moattari M. Effect of virtual versus traditional education on theoretical knowledge and reporting skills of dental students in radiographic interpretation of bony lesions of the jaw. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19 (01) 233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Johnson NR, Gannon OM, Savage NW, Batstone MD. Frequency of odontogenic cysts and tumors: a systematic review. J Investig Clin Dent 2014; 5 (01) 9-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lau KH. Computer-based teaching module design: principles derived from learning theories. Med Educ 2014; 48 (03) 247-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Reynolds PA, Harper J, Mason R, Cox MJ, Eaton K. An intricate web - designing and authoring a web-based course. Br Dent J 2008; 204 (09) 519-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Knapp TR. Why is the one-group pretest-posttest design still used?. Clin Nurs Res 2016; 25 (05) 467-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Taveira-Gomes T, Ferreira P, Taveira-Gomes I, Severo M, Ferreira MA. What are we looking for in computer-based learning interventions in medical education? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (08) e204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Browne L, Mehra S, Rattan R, Thomas G. Comparing lecture and e-learning as pedagogies for new and experienced professionals in dentistry. Br Dent J 2004; 197 (02) 95-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jäger F, Riemer M, Abendroth M, Sehner S, Harendza S. Virtual patients: the influence of case design and teamwork on students' perception and knowledge - a pilot study. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14: 137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gurpinar E, Bati H, Tetik C. Learning styles of medical students change in relation to time. Adv Physiol Educ 2011; 35 (03) 307-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gurpinar E, Alimoglu MK, Mamakli S, Aktekin M. Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instruction methods and academic achievement in medical education?. Adv Physiol Educ 2010; 34 (04) 192-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Choe RC, Scuric Z, Eshkol E. et al. Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos. CBE Life Sci Educ 2019; 18 (04) ar55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Schulz P, Sagheb K, Affeldt H, Klumpp H, Taylor K, Walter C. et al. Acceptance of e-learning devices by dental students. Med 2 0. 2013; 2 (02) e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Cutler CW, Parise M, Seminario AL, Mendez MJ, Piskorowski W, Silva R. Should attendance be required in lecture classrooms in dental education? Two viewpoints: viewpoint 1: attendance in the lecture classroom should be required and viewpoint 2: attendance should not be required in the lecture classroom. J Dent Educ 2016; 80 (12) 1474-1478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ojeh N, Sobers-Grannum N, Gaur U, Udupa A, Majumder MAA. Learning style preferences: a study of pre-clinical medical students in Barbados. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2017; 5 (04) 185-194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 McCann AL, Schneiderman ED, Hinton RJ. E-teaching and learning preferences of dental and dental hygiene students. J Dent Educ 2010; 74 (01) 65-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ariana A, Amin M, Pakneshan S, Dolan-Evans E, Lam AK. Integration of traditional and e-learning methods to improve learning outcomes for dental students in histopathology. J Dent Educ 2016; 80 (09) 1140-1148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar