Management of Panfacial Trauma: Sequencing and Pitfalls

Abstract

Panfacial trauma refers to high-energy mechanism injuries involving two or more areas of the craniofacial skeleton, the frontal bone, the midface, and the occlusal unit. These can be distracting injuries in an unstable patient and, as in any trauma, Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols should be followed. The airway should be secured, bleeding controlled, and sequential examinations should take place to avoid overlooking injuries. When indicated, neurosurgery and ophthalmology should be consulted as preservation of brain, vision, and hearing function should be prioritized. Once the patient is stabilized, reconstruction aims to reduce panfacial fractures, restore the horizontal and vertical facial buttresses, and resuspend the soft tissue to avoid the appearance of premature aging. Lost or comminuted bone can be replaced with bone grafts, although adequate reduction should be ensured prior to any grafting. Operative sequencing can be performed from top-down and outside-in or from bottom-up and inside-out depending on patient presentation. All protocols can successfully manage panfacial injuries, and the emphasis should be placed on a systematic approach that works from known areas to unknown areas.

Keywords

panfacial trauma - le fort fracture - facial fracture - bone graft - mandible fracture - frontal bone fracture

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. September 2021

• References

• 1 Ricketts S, Gill HS, Fialkov JA, Matic DB, Antonyshyn OM. Facial Fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (02) 424e-444e
• 2 Gruss JS, Bubak PJ, Egbert MA. Craniofacial fractures. An algorithm to optimize results. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19 (01) 195-206
• 3 He D, Zhang Y, Ellis III E. Panfacial fractures: analysis of 33 cases treated late. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 (12) 2459-2465
• 4 ATLS Subcommittee. American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma, International ATLS working group. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®): the ninth edition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 74 (05) 1363-1366
• 5 Wang L, Lee TS, Wang W, Yi DI, Sokoya M, Ducic Y. Surgical Management of Panfacial Fractures. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (06) 565-577
• 6 Tung TC, Tseng WS, Chen CT, Lai JP, Chen YR. Acute life-threatening injuries in facial fracture patients: a review of 1,025 patients. J Trauma 2000; 49 (03) 420-424
• 7 Curtis W, Horswell BB. Panfacial fractures: an approach to management. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2013; 25 (04) 649-660
• 8 Gassner R, Tuli T, Hächl O, Rudisch A, Ulmer H. Cranio-maxillofacial trauma: a 10 year review of 9,543 cases with 21,067 injuries. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003; 31 (01) 51-61
• 9 Mulligan RP, Mahabir RC. The prevalence of cervical spine injury, head injury, or both with isolated and multiple craniomaxillofacial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1647-1651
• 10 Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med 2000; 343 (02) 94-99
• 11 Biffl WL, Moore EE, Offner PJ, Brega KE, Franciose RJ, Burch JM. Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. J Trauma 1999; 47 (05) 845-853
• 12 Kim DY, Biffl W, Bokhari F. et al. Evaluation and management of blunt cerebrovascular injury: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020; 88 (06) 875-887
• 13 Chaudhry O, Isakson M, Franklin A, Maqusi S, El Amm C. Facial Fractures: Pearls and Perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (05) 742e-758e
• 14 Seikaly H. Epistaxis. Solomon CG, ed. N Engl J Med 2021; 384 (10) 944-951
• 15 Kita R, Kikuta T, Takahashi M. et al. Efficacy and complications of submental tracheal intubation compared with tracheostomy in maxillofacial trauma patients. J Oral Sci 2016; 58 (01) 23-28
• 16 Rodrigues WC, de Melo WM, de Almeida RS, Pardo-Kaba SC, Sonoda CK, Shinohara EH. Submental intubation in cases of panfacial fractures: A retrospective study. Anesth Prog 2017; 64 (03) 153-161
• 17 Markowitz BL, Manson PN. Panfacial fractures: organization of treatment. Clin Plast Surg 1989; 16 (01) 105-114
• 18 Gruss JS, Phillips JH. Complex facial trauma: the evolving role of rigid fixation and immediate bone graft reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1989; 16 (01) 93-104
• 19 Gruss JS, Mackinnon SE. Complex maxillary fractures: role of buttress reconstruction and immediate bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (01) 9-22
• 20 Hopper RA, Salemy S, Sze RW. Diagnosis of midface fractures with CT: what the surgeon needs to know. Radiographics 2006; 26 (03) 783-793
• 21 Kelly KJ, Manson PN, Vander Kolk CA. et al. Sequencing LeFort fracture treatment (Organization of treatment for a panfacial fracture). J Craniofac Surg 1990; 1 (04) 168-178
• 22 Yang R, Zhang C, Liu Y, Li Z, Li Z. Why should we start from mandibular fractures in the treatment of panfacial fractures?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70 (06) 1386-1392
• 23 Kelley P, Hopper R, Gruss J. Evaluation and treatment of zygomatic fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (07, Suppl 2): 5S-15S
• 24 Suhaym O, Houle A, Griebel A, Miloro M, Callahan N. The Quality of the Evidence in Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: Are We Making Progress?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 79 (04) 893.e1-893.e7
• 25 Degala S, Sundar SS, Mamata KS. A Comparative Prospective Study of Two Different Treatment Sequences i.e. Bottom Up-Inside Out and Topdown-Outside in, in the Treatment of Panfacial Fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2015; 14 (04) 986-994
• 26 Gruss JS. Naso-ethmoid-orbital fractures: classification and role of primary bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 75 (03) 303-317
• 27 Pisano J, Tiwana PS. Management of Panfacial, Naso-Orbital-Ethmoid and Frontal Sinus Fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2019; 27 (02) 83-92
• 28 Gruss JS, Hurwitz JJ, Nik NA, Kassel EE. The pattern and incidence of nasolacrimal injury in naso-orbital-ethmoid fractures: the role of delayed assessment and dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Plast Surg 1985; 38 (01) 116-121
• 29 Birgfeld CB, Mundinger GS, Gruss JS. Evidence-Based Medicine: Evaluation and Treatment of Zygoma Fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 168e-180e
• 30 Phillips JH, Gruss JS, Wells MD, Chollet A. Periosteal suspension of the lower eyelid and cheek following subciliary exposure of facial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 88 (01) 145-148
• 31 Moss CJ, Mendelson BC, Taylor GI. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments in the temple and periorbital regions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (04) 1475-1490
• 32 Hashem AM, Couto RA, Duraes EFR. et al. Facelift Part I: History, Anatomy, and Clinical Assessment. Aesthetic Surg J. 2019; 1-18
• 33 Choi WS, Samman N. Risks and benefits of deliberate hypotension in anaesthesia: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37 (08) 687-703
• 34 Alonso N, de Oliveira Bastos E, Massenburg BB. Pseudoaneurysm of the internal maxillary artery: A case report of facial trauma and recurrent bleeding. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 21: 63-66
• 35 Rodriguez ED, Stanwix MG, Nam AJ. et al. Twenty-six-year experience treating frontal sinus fractures: a novel algorithm based on anatomical fracture pattern and failure of conventional techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (06) 1850-1866
• 36 Koudstaal MJ, van der Wal KGH, Bijvoet HWC, Vincent AJPE, Poublon RMI. Post-trauma mucocele formation in the frontal sinus; a rationale of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33 (08) 751-754
• 37 Dalena MM, Liu FC, Halsey JN, Lee ES, Granick MS. Assessment of Panfacial Fractures in the Pediatric Population. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 78 (07) 1156-1161
• 38 Massenburg BB, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Taub PJ. Surgical treatment of pediatric craniofacial fractures: A national perspective. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (08) 2375-2380