Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(03): 549-556
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735798
Original Article

Toothbrush-Dentifrice Abrasion of Dental Sealants: An In Vitro Study

Angkhana Sangpanya
1   Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
,
Pornpoj Fuangtharnthip 
2   Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Vanida Nimmanon
2   Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Praewpat Pachimsawat
2   Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
› Author Affiliations Funding This work was supported by a grant from Mahidol University.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study sought to investigate the toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of dental sealants.

Materials and Methods Weight loss (∆W) and depth loss (∆D) were used as abrasion indicators. Sealant samples from nine products were soaked in dentifrice slurry and abraded by using a toothbrushing machine with a brushing force of 300 g. The mean percentages of ∆W and mean values of ∆D after 24,000 and 48,000 strokes of brushing were compared by using paired t-test. A comparison of these mean values among sealant products was performed by using one-way ANOVA and multiple comparison analysis (Scheffe's test).

Results Abrasive wear was observed in all sealants. Teethmate F-1 (Kuraray Noritake, Tokyo, Japan)—a fluoride-releasing unfilled sealant—exhibited the maximum abrasive wear, with ∆W and ∆D values of 1.14% ± 0.37% and 12.84 ± 4.28 µm, respectively. Delton (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States), a light-cured unfilled sealant, showed the minimum abrasive wear, with ∆W and ∆D values of 0.41% ± 0.09% and 2.93 ± 1.23 µm, respectively. No statistical differences were observed among unfilled sealants except when compared with Teethmate F-1. Similarly, no differences were observed when comparing among filled sealants and flowable composite.

Conclusion Abrasive wear occurred in all sealants after brushing with dentifrice. Almost all unfilled sealants showed less wear compared with both filled sealants and flowable composite. However, the low abrasive values of all sealants after brushing with dentifrice implied that there is no clinical significance to this finding.

Keywords

abrasion - dental sealants - dentifrice - toothbrushing


Publication History

Article published online:
02 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Wright JT, Tampi MP, Graham L. et al. Sealants for preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent 2016; 38 (04) 282-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Garg N, Indushekar KR, Saraf BG, Sheoran N, Sardana D. Comparative evaluation of penetration ability of three pit and fissure sealants and their relationship with fissure patterns. J Dent (Shiraz) 2018; 19 (02) 92-99
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillip's Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed.. St. Louis, Mo: Saunders; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation. 10th ed.. St. Louis: Mosby; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Dean JA. McDonald and Avery's Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 10 ed.. St. Louis: Mosby; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Braunecker WA, Matyjaszewski K. Controlled/living radical polymerization: features, developments, and perspectives. Prog Polym Sci 2007; 32 (01) 93-146
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nesvadba P. Radical polymerization in industry. In: Encyclopedia of Radicals in Chemistry, Biology and Materials. Vol 1. New Jersey: Wiley; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Naaman R, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi N. The use of pit and fissure sealants: a literature review. Dent J (Basel) 2017;5(04):
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Hardin JF. Clark's Clinical Dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable resin composites: a systematic review and clinical considerations. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (06) ZE18-ZE24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Baroudi K, Mahmoud S. Improving composite resin performance through decreasing its viscosity by different methods. Open Dent J 2015; 9: 235-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift Jr EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129 (05) 567-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Reddy VR, Chowdhary N, Mukunda KS, Kiran NK, Kavyarani BS, Pradeep MC. Retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants: a comparative clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent 2015; 6 (Suppl. 01) S18-S23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Matalon S, Peretz B, Sidon R, Weiss EI, Slutzky H. Antibacterial properties of pit and fissure sealants combined with daily fluoride mouth rinse. Pediatr Dent 2010; 32 (01) 9-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hassall DC, Mellor AC. The sealant restoration: indications, success and clinical technique. Br Dent J 2001; 191 (07) 358-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Simonsen RJ, Neal RC. A review of the clinical application and performance of pit and fissure sealants. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 (Suppl. 01) 45-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122 (10) 34-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence Int 1993; 24 (09) 641-658
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Schemehorn BR, Moore MH, Putt MS. Abrasion, polishing, and stain removal characteristics of various commercial dentifrices in vitro. J Clin Dent 2011; 22 (01) 11-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Tellefsen G, Liljeborg A, Johannsen A, Johannsen G. The role of the toothbrush in the abrasion process. Int J Dent Hyg 2011; 9 (04) 284-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84 (01) 93-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pintado MR, Conry JP, Douglas WH. Fissure sealant wear at 30 months: new evaluation criteria. J Dent 1991; 19 (01) 33-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Conry JP, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Quantitative changes in fissure sealant six months after placement. Pediatr Dent 1990; 12 (03) 162-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jensen OE, Perez-Diez F, Handelman SL. Occlusal wear of four pit and fissure sealants over two years. Pediatr Dent 1985; 7 (01) 23-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Strang R, Cummings A, Stephen KW, McMenemy P. Further abrasion resistance and bond strength studies of fissure sealants. J Oral Rehabil 1986; 13 (03) 257-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Simonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24 (05) 393-414
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Report FDA. Colgate great regular flavor. Published 2005. Accessed June 28, 2021 at: https://fda.report/DailyMed/730f40f6-6ac6-49bd-888b-c0b5818a03c8
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Kawai K, Iwami Y, Ebisu S. Effect of resin monomer composition on toothbrush wear resistance. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25 (04) 264-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kanter J, Koski RE, Martin D. The relationship of weight loss to surface roughness of composite resins from simulated toothbrushing. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 47 (05) 505-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Harrington JH, Terry IA. Automatic and hand toothbrushing abrasions studies. J Am Dent Assoc 1964; 68: 343-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Osiewicz MA, Werner A, Roeters FJM, Kleverlaan CJ. Wear of direct resin composites and teeth: considerations for oral rehabilitation. Eur J Oral Sci 2019; 127 (02) 156-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Aker JR. New composite resins: comparison of their resistance to toothbrush abrasion and characteristics of abraded surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1982; 105 (04) 633-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Heath JR, Wilson HJ. Abrasion of restorative materials by toothaste. J Oral Rehabil 1976; 3 (02) 121-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Fraleigh CM, Mc Elhaney JH, Heiser RA. Toothbrushing force study. J Dent Res 1967; 46 (01) 209-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 American Dental Association. Toothbrushes. Published 2019. Accessed June 28, 2021 at: https://www.ada.org/en/member-center/oral-health-topics/toothbrushes
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003; 24 (04) 655-665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Roberts JC, Powers JM, Craig RG. Wear of commercial pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Res 1977; 56 (06) 692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Heath JR, Davenport JC, Jones PA. The abrasion of acrylic resin by cleaning pastes. J Oral Rehabil 1983; 10 (02) 159-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Barrie AM, Stephen KW, Kay EJ. Fissure sealant retention: a comparison of three sealant types under field conditions. Community Dent Health 1990; 7 (03) 273-277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Boksman L, McConnell RJ, Carson B, McCutcheon-Jones EF. A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent. Quintessence Int 1993; 24 (02) 131-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Morphis TL, Toumba KJ, Lygidakis NA. Fluoride pit and fissure sealants: a review. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000; 10 (02) 90-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar