Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(02): 346-350
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735795
Original Article

Effect of Rehabilitation with a New Ocular Prosthesis on Electromyography of the Occipitofrontalis, Temporal, Masseter, and Sternocleidomastoid

Fernanda Pereira de Caxias
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Karen Letícia Sa Teles
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Daniela Micheline dos Santos
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
2   Oral Oncology Center, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto 
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Marcelo Coelho Goiato
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
2   Oral Oncology Center, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
,
André Pinheiro de Magalhães Bertoz
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
3   Department of Pediatric and Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Marcella Santos Januzzi
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Karina Helga Turcio
1   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported through a research grant (process number 2011/17703-9) and scholarship in Brazil/scientific initiation (process number 2017/26094-2) from the Sao Paulo State Research Support Foundation, São Paulo, Brazil.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to verify during facial expressions (“happy,” “sad,” “fearful,” “angry,” “surprised,” and “disgusted”) if: (1) there would be difference in the electromyography (EMG) of the occipitofrontalis, temporal, masseter, and sternocleidomastoid muscles on the normal side (NS) compared with the affected side (AS) (without the use of an ocular prosthesis) in individuals with unilateral absence of the eyeball, and (2) the rehabilitation with a new ocular prosthesis would affect the EMG of the muscles studied on the AS in these individuals.

Materials and Methods Thirteen individuals, without temporomandibular disorder, with good health, with unilateral absence of the eyeball (the eye must have been removed by evisceration or enucleation), and users or nonusers of an ocular prosthesis were included. EMG of the occipitofrontalis, temporal, masseter, and sternocleidomastoid muscles was performed during rest and facial expressions (“happy,” “sad,” “fearful,” “angry,” “surprised,” and “disgusted”) before (T0) and 90 days after (T1) rehabilitation with a new ocular prosthesis. The analyses were performed in T0 on NS and AS (without the use of an ocular prosthesis), and in T1 on AS with the new ocular prosthesis.

Statistical Analysis All data were submitted to the Student's t-test with p < 0.05.

Results There was no statistically significant difference comparing the AS with the NS in T0 for all muscles studied, during all facial expressions evaluated (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference comparing the AS in T0 with itself in T1 for all muscles studied, during all facial expressions evaluated (p > 0.05).

Conclusion Eye loss did not affect the EMG of studied muscles when comparing NS with AS (without the use of an ocular prosthesis). The rehabilitation with ocular prosthesis was not capable of changing the EMG on AS.

Keywords

ocular prosthesis - facial muscles - electromyography - eye - temporal muscle - masseter muscle


Publication History

Article published online:
22 November 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Cattaneo L, Pavesi G. The facial motor system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 38: 135-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Goble DJ, Noble BC, Brown SH. Where was my arm again? Memory-based matching of proprioceptive targets is enhanced by increased target presentation time. Neurosci Lett 2010; 481 (01) 54-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boisgontier MP, Swinnen SP. Proprioception in the cerebellum. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Du S, Tao Y, Martinez AM. Compound facial expressions of emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111 (15) E1454-E1462
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vigliante CE. Anatomy and functions of the muscles of facial expression. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2005; 17 (01) 1-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sessle BJ. Acute and chronic craniofacial pain: brainstem mechanisms of nociceptive transmission and neuroplasticity, and their clinical correlates. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000; 11 (01) 57-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Happak W, Liu J, Burggasser G, Flowers A, Gruber H, Freilinger G. Human facial muscles: dimensions, motor endplate distribution, and presence of muscle fibers with multiple motor endplates. Anat Rec 1997; 249 (02) 276-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bendiksen FS, Dahl HA, Teig E. Innervation pattern of different types of muscle fibres in the human thyroarytenoid muscle. Acta Otolaryngol 1981; 91 (5-6): 391-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Namba T, Nakamura T, Grob D. Motor nerve endings in human extraocular muscle. Neurology 1968; 18 (04) 403-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Goiato MC, Santos MR, Monteiro BC. et al. Electrical activity of the orbicularis muscles before and after installation of ocular prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44 (01) 127-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Regalo SC, Vitti M, Semprini M. et al. EMG activity of the orbicularis oculi muscle in normal and in individuals indicated to receive eye prosthesis, before and after its placement. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 42 (01) 17-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Soares IP, França VP. Evisceration and enucleation. Semin Ophthalmol 2010; 25 (03) 94-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310 (20) 2191-2194
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Small LT, Lampkin M, Vural E, Moreno MA. American Society of Anesthesiologists class as predictor for perioperative morbidity in head and neck free flaps. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 161 (01) 91-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kiratli H, Koç İ. Orbital exenteration: institutional review of evolving trends in indications and rehabilitation techniques. Orbit 2018; 37 (03) 179-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Griffin III CE, Kaye AM, Bueno FR, Kaye AD. Benzodiazepine pharmacology and central nervous system-mediated effects. Ochsner J 2013; 13 (02) 214-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 de Lucena LB, Kosminsky M, da Costa LJ, de Góes PS. Validation of the Portuguese version of the RDC/TMD Axis II questionnaire. Braz Oral Res 2006; 20 (04) 312-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 de Caxias FP, Dos Santos DM, Goiato MC. et al. Effects of mouth rehabilitation with removable complete dentures on stimulus perception and the electromyographic activity of the orbicularis oris muscle. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119 (05) 749-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Goiato MC, Garcia AR, dos Santos DM. Electromyographic activity of the mandible muscles at the beginning and end of masticatory cycles in patients with complete dentures. Gerontology 2008; 54 (03) 138-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Guedes LU, Parreira VF, Diório AC, Goulart F, Andrade AD, Britto RR. Electromyographic activity of sternocleidomastoid muscle in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009; 19 (04) 591-597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lehman GJ, McGill SM. The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999; 22 (07) 444-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, Moreno A, Filié Haddad M, Turcio KH. An alternate impression technique for ocular prostheses. J Prosthodont 2013; 22 (04) 338-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, de Sousa Ervolino IC, Brunetto JL, de Magalhaes Bertoz AP, de Moraes Melo Neto CL. Prosthetic rehabilitation of an eye globe: case report. Med Arh 2019; 73 (06) 433-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Moreno A, Dos Santos DM, Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto C, Luiz de Melo Moreno A, de Magalhães Bertoz AP, Goiato MC. In vitro evaluation of the effect of different disinfectants on the biofilm of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus formed on acrylic ocular prostheses. PLoS One 2020; 15 (10) e0240116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bonaque-González S, Amigó A, Rodríguez-Luna C. Recommendations for post-adaption care of an ocular prosthesis: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38 (06) 397-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Bannwart LC. et al. Psychosocial impact on anophthalmic patients wearing ocular prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42 (01) 113-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar