Protrusio acetabular en artroplastía total de cadera: diez tácticas para un buen resultado quirúrgico

Resumen

Los pacientes candidatos a artroplastía total de cadera con protrusio acetabular asociada generan distintos desafíos en los equipos quirúrgicos. Múltiples estrategias han sido utilizadas a lo largo de los años para optimizar los resultados. Mediante una revisión de la evidencia actualizada disponible, proponemos diez tácticas a realizar en el manejo de estos pacientes que pueden mejorar y hacer predecible el tratamiento de un paciente con protrusio acetabular al que se le realiza una artroplastía total de cadera.

Nivel de Evidencia V.

Palabras Clave

protrusio acetabular - protrusio - artroplastía total de cadera - ATC

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 07. Mai 2020

Angenommen: 21. Januar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. September 2021

• Referencias

• 1 Barbour JA, Binding J, Bridges M, Kelly C. Evaluation of a screening tool for inflammatory joint disease. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62 (02) 187-188 DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.2.187.
• 2 Emara AK, Nageeb E, George J, Buttaro MA, Higuera C, Piuzzi NS. Hypovitaminosis D in lower extremity Joint Arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop 2020; 21: 109-116 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.010.
• 3 Bible MW, Pinals RS, Palmieri GM, Pitcock JA. Protrusio acetabuli in osteoporosis and osteomalacia. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1983; 1 (04) 323-326
• 4 Lin J-A, Liao C-C, Lee Y-J, Wu C-H, Huang W-Q, Chen T-L. Adverse outcomes after major surgery in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73 (09) 1646-1651 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202758.
• 5 Singh JA, Inacio MCS, Namba RS, Paxton EW. Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with higher ninety-day hospital readmission rates compared to osteoarthritis after hip or knee arthroplasty: a cohort study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015; 67 (05) 718-724 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22497.
• 6 Goodman SM, Springer B, Guyatt G. et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (09) 2628-2638 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.001.
• 7 Goodman SM, Miller AS, Turgunbaev M. et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Incorporating Input From a Patient Panel. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 69 (08) 1125-1130 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23275.
• 8 Agca R, Heslinga SC, Rollefstad S. et al. EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular disease risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory joint disorders: 2015/2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76 (01) 17-28 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209775.
• 9 Groleau C, Morin SN, Vautour L, Amar-Zifkin A, Bessissow A. Perioperative corticosteroid administration: a systematic review and descriptive analysis. Perioper Med (Lond) 2018; 7: 10 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-018-0092-9.
• 10 Grennan DM, Gray J, Loudon J, Fear S. Methotrexate and early postoperative complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60 (03) 214-217 DOI: 10.1136/ard.60.3.214.
• 11 Tanaka N, Sakahashi H, Sato E, Hirose K, Ishima T, Ishii S. Examination of the risk of continuous leflunomide treatment on the incidence of infectious complications after joint arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol 2003; 9 (02) 115-118 DOI: 10.1097/01.RHU.0000062514.54375.bd.
• 12 Della Valle AG, Padgett DE, Salvati EA. Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13 (07) 455-462 DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200511000-00005.
• 13 Whiddon DR, Bono JV. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2008; 57: 273-279
• 14 Ranawat CS, Dorr LD, Inglis AE. Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62 (07) 1059-1065
• 15 John JF, Fisher PE. Radiographic determination of the anatomic hip joint center. A cadaver study. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65 (05) 509-510 DOI: 10.3109/17453679409000901.
• 16 Schofer MD, Pressel T, Heyse TJ, Schmitt J, Boudriot U. Radiological determination of the anatomic hip centre from pelvic landmarks. Acta Orthop Belg 2010; 76 (04) 479-485
• 17 Fujii M, Nakamura T, Hara T, Nakashima Y. Is Ranawat triangle method accurate in estimating hip joint center in Japanese population?. J Orthop Sci 2021 Mar;26(02):219–224. Doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 31. PMID: 32245695
• 18 Petretta R, Strelzow J, Ohly NE, Misur P, Masri BA. Acetate templating on digital images is more accurate than computer-based templating for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (12) 3752-3759 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4321-y.
• 19 Arnaout F, Dewan V, Paliobeis C. The 3-dot circle: A reliable method for safe and efficient digital templating of the acetabular component. J Orthop 2018; 15 (03) 787-791 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.027.
• 20 Wang H, Gu J, Liu X. et al. Variation in greater trochanteric lateroversion: a risk factor for femoral stem varus in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2020; 30 (01) 33-39 DOI: 10.1177/1120700018825248.
• 21 Ranawat CS, Zahn MG. Role of bone grafting in correction of protrusio acetabuli by total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1986; 1 (02) 131-137 DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(86)80051-1.
• 22 Sur YJ, Morsy M, Mohan AT, Zhu L, Lachman N, Saint-Cyr M. The first perforating branch of the deep femoral artery: A reliable recipient vessel for vascularized fibular grafts: An anatomical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (03) 351-358 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.10.024.
• 23 Ackerman DB, Trousdale RT. Triplanar trochanteric osteotomy: a modified anterior trochanteric slide osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (03) 459-461 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.006.
• 24 Iyer KM. A new posterior approach to the hip joint. Injury 1981; 13 (01) 76-80 DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(81)90098-x.
• 25 Iyer KM. Technical Note on Modified Posterior Approach to the Hip Joint. J Orthop Case Rep 2015; 5 (01) 69-72 DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.260.
• 26 Merle C, Innmann MM, Waldstein W. et al. High Variability of Acetabular Offset in Primary Hip Osteoarthritis Influences Acetabular Reaming-A Computed Tomography-Based Anatomic Study. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (08) 1808-1814 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.065.
• 27 Baghdadi YMK, Larson AN, Sierra RJ. Restoration of the hip center during THA performed for protrusio acetabuli is associated with better implant survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (10) 3251-3259 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3072-x.
• 28 Cruz-Pardos A, García-Rey E, García-Cimbrelo E, Ortega-Chamarro J. Alumina-on-alumina THA in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a 5-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (05) 1421-1430 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2046-0.
• 29 Zuh S-G, Zazgyva A, Gergely I, Pop TS. Acetabuloplasty with bone grafting in uncemented hip replacement for protrusion. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (09) 1757-1763 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2804-9.
• 30 Mullaji AB, Shetty GM. Acetabular protrusio: surgical technique of dealing with a problem in depth. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (11, Suppl A) 37-40 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32900.
• 31 Mullaji AB, Marawar SV. Primary total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli using impacted morsellized bone grafting and cementless cups: a medium-term radiographic review. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (08) 1143-1149 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.005.
• 32 Stihsen C, Rath C, Radl R. et al. Early migration characteristics of a 180° porous-coated cup with 1-mm press fit. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (05) 707-712 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1713-x.
• 33 Meftah M, Yadav A, Wong AC, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. A novel method for accurate and reproducible functional cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (07) 1200-1205 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.018.
• 34 Slooff TJ, Huiskes R, van Horn J, Lemmens AJ. Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55 (06) 593-596 DOI: 10.3109/17453678408992402.
• 35 Płomiński J, Kwiatkowski K. Cemented primary total arthroplasty for acetabular protrusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2008; 10 (01) 26-34
• 36 Dutka J, Sosin P, Skowronek P, Skowronek M. Total hip arthroplasty with bone grafts for protrusio acetabuli. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2011; 13 (05) 469-477 DOI: 10.5604/15093492.967224.
• 37 Saglam Y, Ozturk I, Cakmak MF, Ozdemir M, Yazicioglu O. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Midterm radiologic and functional results. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2016; 50 (04) 443-447 DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.06.010.
• 38 Baghdadi YMK, Larson AN, Sierra RJ. Long-term results of the uncemented acetabular component in a primary total hip arthroplasty performed for protrusio acetabuli: a fifteen year median follow-up. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (05) 839-845 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2580-y.
• 39 Zhen P, Li X, Zhou S, Lu H, Chen H, Liu J. Total hip arthroplasty to treat acetabular protrusions secondary to rheumatoid arthritis. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13 (01) 92 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0809-y.
• 40 Laaksonen I, Lorimer M, Gromov K. et al. Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2018; 89 (03) 259-264 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1431445.
• 41 Heywood AW. Arthroplasty with a solid bone graft for protrusio acetabuli. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1980; 62 (03) 332-336
• 42 Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Pedersen DR. A stress analysis of acetabular reconstruction in protrusio acetabuli. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65 (04) 495-499
• 43 Padgett DE, Kull L, Rosenberg A, Sumner DR, Galante JO. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. Three to six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (05) 663-673 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199305000-00005.
• 44 Busch VJJF, Gardeniers JWM, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJJH, Schreurs BW. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old: a concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-eight years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (04) 367-371 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01532.
• 45 Welten MLM, Schreurs BW, Buma P, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJJH. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a 10- to 17-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (07) 819-824 DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.7110.
• 46 Rosenberg WWJ, Schreurs BW, de Waal Malefijt MC, Veth RPH, Slooff TJJH. Impacted morsellized bone grafting and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular protrusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an 8- to 18-year follow-up study of 36 hips. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (02) 143-146 DOI: 10.1080/000164700317413102.
• 47 Peeters A, Putzeys G, Thorrez L. Current Insights in the Application of Bone Grafts for Local Antibiotic Delivery in Bone Reconstruction Surgery. J Bone Jt Infect 2019; 4 (05) 245-253 DOI: 10.7150/jbji.38373.
• 48 Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 1993; 14 (03) 231-242 DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2.
• 49 Jaffe WL, Hawkins CA. Normalized and proportionalized cemented femoral stem survivorship at 15 years. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (06) 708-713 DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90226-7.
• 50 Davey JR, O'Connor DO, Burke DW, Harris WH. Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8 (01) 23-26
• 51 Mäkelä KT, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Virolainen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V. Cemented versus cementless total hip replacements in patients fifty-five years of age or older with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (02) 178-186 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01283.
• 52 Hopper Jr RH, Ho H, Sritulanondha S, Williams AC, Engh Jr CA. Otto Aufranc Award: Crosslinking Reduces THA Wear, Osteolysis, and Revision Rates at 15-year Followup Compared With Noncrosslinked Polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (02) 279-290 DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000036.