Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2022; 11(04): 295-301
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735231
Scientific Article

Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of Information in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Shared on YouTube

Emre Anıl Özbek 
1   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ibni Sina Training and Research Hospital, University of Ankara, İbni Sina Hospital, Ankara University Medicine Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
,
Mehmet Armangil 
2   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hand Surgery Division, İbni Sina Training and Research Hospital, University of Ankara, İbni Sina Hospital, Ankara University Medicine Faculty, 06100 Samanpazarı, Ankara, Turkey
,
Mustafa Onur Karaca 
1   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ibni Sina Training and Research Hospital, University of Ankara, İbni Sina Hospital, Ankara University Medicine Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
,
Abdullah Merter 
1   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ibni Sina Training and Research Hospital, University of Ankara, İbni Sina Hospital, Ankara University Medicine Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
,
Merve Dursun 
1   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ibni Sina Training and Research Hospital, University of Ankara, İbni Sina Hospital, Ankara University Medicine Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
,
Hakan Kocaoğlu 
1   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ibni Sina Training and Research Hospital, University of Ankara, İbni Sina Hospital, Ankara University Medicine Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose Most of the internet users search online on YouTube for their health problems and the treatments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality and the reliability of the videos on YouTube for Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Methods The search was made by typing the keywords “Carpal tunnel syndrome” and/or “CTS” into the YouTube search engine, the first 50 videos on the first three pages of YouTube were evaluated. Of these videos, title, duration, number of views, days since uploaded, view ratio (view per day), number of likes, number of dislikes, video power index (VPI), video source, and video content data were recorded. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria were used to evaluate the reliability of videos, where the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Carpal tunnel syndrome-specific score (CTS-SS) were used to evaluate the quality of the videos.

Results The mean duration of the videos was 364.12 seconds (min 57, max 1,638) and the total duration of videos was 18,206 seconds. The mean number of views was 140,916.1 (min 10,543, max 1,271,040) and total number of views was 7,045,804. The mean JAMA score was 1.8 (min 1, max 4), the mean GQS was 2.72 (min 1, max 5), and the mean CTS-SS was 4.74 (min 1, max 14). There was no significant effect of video content on VPI, JAMA, GQS, or CTS-SS (p >0.05). The JAMA, GQS, CT-SS scores of the videos from physicians and academic sources were significantly higher compared with other sources (p <0.05).

Conclusion YouTube is one of the most frequently used resource for patients to get information about their diagnosis and treatment methods and it consists of videos with low reliability and quality for CTS. We believe that the creation of an internet-based information resource, which the patients can refer to is one of the current social responsibilities of the physicians and the academicians.

Level of Evidence This is a Level V study.

Keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome - YouTube - Internet - reliability - quality - education

Note

The study was performed at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara University.


Ethical Approval

Ethical approval is not required for this study.


Authors' Contributions

E.A.Ö. contributed toward conceptualization/design, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, and writing manuscript. M.A. did the conceptualization/design and supervision/oversight. M.O.K. contributed toward the methodology, data curation, and formal analysis. A.M. worked toward the methodology, data curation, and formal analysis. M.D. contributed toward the methodology and data curation. H.K. worked upon the methodology.




Publication History

Received: 04 June 2021

Accepted: 19 July 2021

Article published online:
06 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Giladi AM, Lin IC, Means Jr KR, Kennedy SA. applying evidence to inform Carpal tunnel syndrome care. J Hand Surg Am 2021; 46 (03) 223-230.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Vasiliadis HS, Georgoulas P, Shrier I, Salanti G, Scholten RJPM. Endoscopic release for Carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (01) CD008265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zhuang T, Kortlever JTP, Shapiro LM, Baker L, Harris AHS, Kamal RN. The influence of cost information on treatment choice: a mixed-methods study. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (10) 899-908.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wang D, Jayakar RG, Leong NL, Leathers MP, Williams RJ, Jones KJ. Evaluation of the quality, accuracy, and readability of online patient resources for the management of articular cartilage defects. Cartilage 2017; 8 (02) 112-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Perrin A, Duggan M. Americans' internet access: 2000–2015. Pew Res Cent 2015; 26 (06) 1-12 . Accessed May 15, 2021 at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cassidy JT, Baker JF. Orthopaedic Patient Information on the World Wide Web: An Essential Review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (04) 325-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C. et al. YouTube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2019; 1 (02) e109-e114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kunze KN, Krivicich LM, Verma NN, Chahla J. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for the meniscus: a YouTube-based quality-control study. Arthroscopy 2020; 36 (01) 233-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES. et al. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (03) 840-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jansen BJ, Spink A. An analysis of web documents retrieved and viewed. Paper presented at: International Conference on Internet Computing. Citeseer; 2003: 65-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997; 277 (15) 1244-1245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine 2018; 43 (22) E1334-E1339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 AAOS S. No Title. . Accessed May 15, 2021 at: https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/diseases–conditions/carpal-tunnel-syndrome/
    PubMed
  • 14 Steimle J, Gabriel S, Tarr R, Kohrs B, Johnston P, Martineau D. Comparing diagnostic and treatment recommendations of carpal tunnel syndrome available on the internet with AAOS clinical practice guidelines. Hand (N Y) 2020; 15 (04) 514-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Aung KK, Wu WK, Tokumi A, Kuo P, Day CS. Does a directive to an Internet site enhance the doctor-patient interaction? A prospective randomized study for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (13) 1112-1118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gong HS, Park JW, Shin YH, Kim K, Cho KJ, Baek GH. Use of a decision aid did not decrease decisional conflict in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18 (01) 118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lutsky K, Bernstein J, Beredjiklian P. Quality of information on the Internet about Carpal tunnel syndrome: an update. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (08) e1038-e1041
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kelly M, Seoighe DM, Baker JF, Kennedy J, Byrne DP, Shea KO. Correspondence and communication: a quality analysis of internet-based information on common hand pathology. Br J Plast Surg 2014; 25: 32-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Frueh FS, Palma AF, Raptis DA, Graf CP, Giovanoli P, Calcagni M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis of online patient information with the EQIP tool. Chir Main 2015; 34 (03) 113-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar