PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Semin Hear 2021; 42(03): 248-259
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735133
Review Article

Wind Noise Management in Hearing Aids

Petri Korhonen
1   Office of Research in Clinical Amplification (ORCA-US), WS Audiology, Lisle, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Many hearing aid users are negatively impacted by wind noise when spending time outdoors. Turbulent airflow around hearing aid microphones caused by the obstruction of wind can result in noise that is not only perceived as annoying but may also mask desirable sounds in the listening environment, such as speech. To mitigate the adverse effects of wind noise, hearing aid developers have introduced several technological solutions to reduce the amount of wind noise at the hearing aid output. Some solutions are based on mechanical modifications; more recently, sophisticated signal processing algorithms have also been introduced. By offering solutions to the wind noise problem, these signal processing algorithms can promote more optimal use of hearing aids during outdoor activities. This article reviews how wind noise is generated in hearing aids, outlines the technological challenges in wind noise management, and summarizes the technological solutions that have been proposed and/or implemented in modern hearing aids.

Keywords

hearing aids - noise reduction - wind noise


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. September 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing. Hear J 2010; 63 (01) 19-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bisgaard N, Ruf S. Findings from EuroTrak surveys from 2009 to 2015: hearing loss prevalence, hearing aid adoption, and benefits of hearing aid use. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (3S): 451-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zakis JA. Wind noise at microphones within and across hearing aids at wind speeds below and above microphone saturation. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 129 (06) 3897-3907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Strasberg M. Dimensional analysis of windscreen in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 544-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kates J. Digital Hearing Aids. Plural Publishing; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Morgan S, Raspet R. Investigation of the mechanisms of low-frequency wind noise generation outdoors. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92 (02) 1180-1183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dillon H, Roe I, Katsch R. Wind Noise in Hearing Aids: Mechanisms and Measurements. National Acoustics Laboratories; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Chung K. Strategies to reduce wind noise interference on hearing aids. Hear J 2020; 73 (07) 10-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wuttke J. Microphones and the wind. J Audio Eng Soc 1991; 40: 809-817
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Raspet R, Webster J, Dillion K. Framework for wind noise studies. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119 (02) 834-843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Brown D, Mongeau L. The Design, Construction, and Validation of a Small, Low- Speed, Quiet Wind Tunnel with Application to Noise from the Flow over a Cavity. Purdue University; 1995: HL95-HL99
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Beard J, Nepomuceno H. Wind Noise Levels for an ITE Hearing Aid. Knowles Electronics; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Chung K, Mongeau L, McKibben N. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: polar characteristics of behind-the-ear hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 2009; 125 (04) 2243-2259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Corcos G. Resolution of pressure in turbulence. J Acoust Soc Am 1963; 35: 192-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Corcos G. The structure of the turbulence field in boundary-layer flows. J Fluid Mech 1964; 18: 353-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Widex SUPER™ Power to Hear. Widex; 2012 . Accessed March 5, 2021 at: https://fi.widex.pro/-/media/downloads/pdf/hearing-aids/super/brochures/en/widex-super-vsd-introduction-brochure_9-502-2928-001-01.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ricketts TA, Dittberner AB, Johnson EE. High-frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (01) 160-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chung K, McKibben N, Mongeau L. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 127 (04) 2529-2542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Groth J. An Innovative RIE with Microphone in the Ear Lets Users “Hear with Their Own Ears.”. GN Hearing A/S; 2020: 1-8
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Chung K. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (04) 470-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ricketts TA. Directional hearing AIDS. Trends Amplif 2001; 5 (04) 139-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bentler R, Chiou L-K. Digital noise reduction: an overview. Trends Amplif 2006; 10 (02) 67-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Stender T, Hielscher M. Windguard: Bringing Listening Comfort to Windy Conditions. ReSound; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Weille J, Andersen R. Wind Noise Management. Oticon; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Latzel M, Appleton J. Evaluation of a binaural speech in wind feature, Part 1: verification in the laboratory. Hear Rev 2013; 8: 32-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Latzel M, Appleton J. Evaluation of a binaural speech in wind feature, Part 2: validation and real-life benefit. Hear Rev 2013; 9: 32-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kuk F, Ludvigsen C, Paludan-Muller C. Improving hearing aid performance in noise: challenges and strategies. Hear J 2002; 55 (04) 34-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dillon H. Hearing Aids. 2nd ed.. Boomerang Press; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Chung K. Wind noise in hearing aids: I. Effect of wide dynamic range compression and modulation-based noise reduction. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (01) 16-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kuk F, Keenan D, Lau C-C, Ludvigsen C. Performance of a fully adaptive directional microphone to signals presented from various azimuths. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (06) 333-347
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Graves A, Mohamed H, Hinton G. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. Paper presented at IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing; May 26 – 31, 2013; Vancouver, Canada.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lipton Z, Berkowitz J, Elkan C. A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. arXiv 2015;1506.00019v4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Chen J, Wang Y, Yoho SE, Wang D, Healy EW. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises. J Acoust Soc Am 2016; 139 (05) 2604-2612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Keshavarzi M, Goehring T, Zakis J, Turner RE, Moore BCJ. Use of a deep recurrent neural network to reduce wind noise: effects on judged speech intelligibility and sound quality. Trends Hear 2018; 22: 2331216518770964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Haykin S. Adaptive Filter Theory. Pearson; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Korhonen P, Kuk F, Seper E, Mørkebjerg M, Roikjer M. Evaluation of a wind noise attenuation algorithm on subjective annoyance and speech-in-wind performance. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28 (01) 046-057
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lee L. Efficiency of a wind noise attenuation algorithm. Hear Rev 2016; 23 (06) 22-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kuk F, Lau C-C, Korhonen P, Crose B, Peeters H, Keenan D. Development of the ORCA nonsense syllable test. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (06) 779-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Picou EM. MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) survey results demonstrate high satisfaction with and benefits from hearing aids. Semin Hear 2020; 41 (01) 21-36
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar