Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2021; 13(02): e102-e107
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733938
Research Article

Virtual Ophthalmology Fellowship Interviews: Perceptions of U.S. Ophthalmology Fellowship Applicants in 2020

Samir N. Patel
1   Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Elliot G. Cherkas
2   Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Charlotte N. Shields
2   Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Rebecca R. Soares
1   Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
John W. Hinkle
1   Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Reza Razeghinejad
3   Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Kristin M. Hammersmith
4   Cornea Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Brenton D. Finklea
4   Cornea Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Carol L. Shields
5   Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Michael N. Cohen
1   Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
M. A. Khan
1   Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Ajay E. Kuriyan
1   Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Michael A. Klufas
1   Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the experiences and preferences of ophthalmology fellowship applicants utilizing a virtual interview format.

Design Present study is a cross-sectional study.

Subjects All fellowship applicants to Wills Eye Hospital during 2020 to 2021 application cycle were included.

Methods A nonvalidated, online survey was conducted, and surveys were distributed at the conclusion of the interview process after rank list submission.

Main Outcome Measures Applicant demographics, application submissions, interview experiences, financial considerations, and suggestions for improvement of the virtual interview process were the primary outcomes of this cross-sectional study.

Results Survey responses were received from 68 fellowship applicants (34% response rate). Thirty (44%) applicants preferred in-person interviews, 25 (36%) preferred virtual interviews, and 13 (19%) would like to prefer the option to choose either. Fifty-five of 68 (80%) applicants attended the same range of interviews for which they received interview invitations. Reduced costs were reported as the highest ranked strength of virtual interviews in 44 (65%) applicants, with a majority of respondents (68%) spending less than U.S. $250 throughout the entire process. The highest ranked limitation for virtual interviews was limited exposure to the culture/environment of the program in 20 (29%) respondents. On a scale of 0 to 100, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) satisfaction level with the fellowship application process was 74.6 (18.3) and mean (SD) perceived effectiveness levels of virtual interviews was 67.4 (20.4).

Conclusion Respondents were generally satisfied with virtual interviews and noted reduced costs and increased ability to attend more fellowship interviews as the strengths of the virtual interview format. Limited exposure to the culture/environment of the program was cited as the most important limitation.

Keywords

COVID-19 - ophthalmology trainees - virtual interviews - medical education

Meeting Presentation

None.


Financial Support

None.


Relevant Disclosures

No conflicting relationship exists for any author. A.J.K. is a consultant for Alimera Sciences, Allergan, and Bausch Health. M.A.K. is a consultant for Genentech and Allergen and a lecturer for Genentech and Regeneron. M.N.C. is a consultant for Allergan.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 03 February 2021

Accepted: 03 April 2021

Article published online:
10 November 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Keesara S, Jonas A, Schulman K. Covid-19 and health care's digital revolution. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (23) e82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wijesooriya NR, Mishra V, Brand PLP, Rubin BK. COVID-19 and telehealth, education, and research adaptations. Paediatr Respir Rev 2020; 35: 38-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Johnson J, Chung MT, Stathakios J, Gonik N, Siegel B. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship training: a national survey of pediatric otolaryngology fellowship directors. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 136: 110217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Tseng J. How has covid-19 affected the costs of the surgical fellowship interview process?. J Surg Educ 2020; 77 (05) 999-1004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Robinson KA, Shin B, Gangadharan SP. A comparison between in-person and virtual fellowship interviews during the covid-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 2020; 78 (04) 1175-1181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nguyen JK, Shah N, Heitkamp DE, Gupta Y. Covid-19 and the radiology match: A residency program's survival guide to the virtual interview season. Acad Radiol 2020; 27 (09) 1294-1297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nesemeier BR, Lebo NL, Schmalbach CE. et al. Impact of the covid-19 global pandemic on the otolaryngology fellowship application process. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 163 (04) 712-713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Menhaji K, Gaigbe-Togbe BH, Hardart A. et al. Virtual interviews during covid-19: Perspectives of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery program directors. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ehrlich H, Boneva D, Mckenney M, Elkbuli A. Virtual interviews for the 2020–2021 national residency matching program during the covid-19 pandemic: A curse or blessing?. Am Surg 2020; 85 (04) 700-701
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hill MV, Ross EA, Crawford D. et al. Program and candidate experience with virtual interviews for the 2020 Complex General Surgical Oncology interview season during the COVID pandemic. Am J Surg 2020; S0002-9610 (20)30730-3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Susarla SM, Swanson EW, Slezak S, Lifchez SD, Redett RJ. The perception and costs of the interview process for plastic surgery residency programs: Can the process be streamlined?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 302e-309e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bird SB, Hern HG, Blomkalns A. et al. Innovation in residency selection: The AAMC standardized video interview. Acad Med 2019; 94 (10) 1489-1497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Quillen DA, Siatkowski RM, Feldon S. of the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. Covid-19 and the ophthalmology match. Ophthalmology 2021; 128 (02) 181-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Christiansen SM, Osher JM, Riemann CD. Association of mentor-to-program contact and applicant rank disclosure with vitreoretinal fellowship applicant's final match outcome in 2016 and 2017. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018; 136 (06) 642-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Daram SR, Wu R, Tang SJ. Interview from anywhere: feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109 (02) 155-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Edje L, Miller C, Kiefer J, Oram D. Using skype as an alternative for residency selection interviews. J Grad Med Educ 2013; 5 (03) 503-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Miotto GC. Tele-interview in the aesthetic fellowship selection process. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (11) NP175-NP177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Venincasa MJ, Cai LZ, Gedde SJ, Uhler T, Sridhar J. Current applicant perceptions of the ophthalmology residency match. JAMA Ophthalmol 2020; 138 (05) 460-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hariton E, Bortoletto P, Ayogu N. Using video-conference interviews in the residency application process. Acad Med 2017; 92 (06) 728-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zafar S, Bressler NM, Golnik KC. et al. Fellowship match outcomes in the U.S. from 2010 to 2017: analysis of San Francisco Match. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 218: 261-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pourmand A, Lee H, Fair M, Maloney K, Caggiula A. Feasibility and usability of tele-interview for medical residency interview. West J Emerg Med 2018; 19 (01) 80-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Williams K, Kling JM, Labonte HR, Blair JE. Videoconference interviewing: Tips for success. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 (03) 331-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Healy WL, Bedair H. Videoconference interviews for an adult reconstruction fellowship: lessons learned. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (21) e114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar