Virtual Ophthalmology Fellowship Interviews: Perceptions of U.S. Ophthalmology Fellowship Applicants in 2020

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the experiences and preferences of ophthalmology fellowship applicants utilizing a virtual interview format.

Design Present study is a cross-sectional study.

Subjects All fellowship applicants to Wills Eye Hospital during 2020 to 2021 application cycle were included.

Methods A nonvalidated, online survey was conducted, and surveys were distributed at the conclusion of the interview process after rank list submission.

Main Outcome Measures Applicant demographics, application submissions, interview experiences, financial considerations, and suggestions for improvement of the virtual interview process were the primary outcomes of this cross-sectional study.

Results Survey responses were received from 68 fellowship applicants (34% response rate). Thirty (44%) applicants preferred in-person interviews, 25 (36%) preferred virtual interviews, and 13 (19%) would like to prefer the option to choose either. Fifty-five of 68 (80%) applicants attended the same range of interviews for which they received interview invitations. Reduced costs were reported as the highest ranked strength of virtual interviews in 44 (65%) applicants, with a majority of respondents (68%) spending less than U.S. $250 throughout the entire process. The highest ranked limitation for virtual interviews was limited exposure to the culture/environment of the program in 20 (29%) respondents. On a scale of 0 to 100, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) satisfaction level with the fellowship application process was 74.6 (18.3) and mean (SD) perceived effectiveness levels of virtual interviews was 67.4 (20.4).

Conclusion Respondents were generally satisfied with virtual interviews and noted reduced costs and increased ability to attend more fellowship interviews as the strengths of the virtual interview format. Limited exposure to the culture/environment of the program was cited as the most important limitation.

Keywords

COVID-19 - ophthalmology trainees - virtual interviews - medical education

Meeting Presentation

None.

Financial Support

None.

Relevant Disclosures

No conflicting relationship exists for any author. A.J.K. is a consultant for Alimera Sciences, Allergan, and Bausch Health. M.A.K. is a consultant for Genentech and Allergen and a lecturer for Genentech and Regeneron. M.N.C. is a consultant for Allergan.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 03. Februar 2021

Angenommen: 03. April 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. November 2021

• References

• 1 Keesara S, Jonas A, Schulman K. Covid-19 and health care's digital revolution. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (23) e82
• 2 Wijesooriya NR, Mishra V, Brand PLP, Rubin BK. COVID-19 and telehealth, education, and research adaptations. Paediatr Respir Rev 2020; 35: 38-42
• 3 Johnson J, Chung MT, Stathakios J, Gonik N, Siegel B. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fellowship training: a national survey of pediatric otolaryngology fellowship directors. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 136: 110217
• 4 Tseng J. How has covid-19 affected the costs of the surgical fellowship interview process?. J Surg Educ 2020; 77 (05) 999-1004
• 5 Robinson KA, Shin B, Gangadharan SP. A comparison between in-person and virtual fellowship interviews during the covid-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 2020; 78 (04) 1175-1181
• 6 Nguyen JK, Shah N, Heitkamp DE, Gupta Y. Covid-19 and the radiology match: A residency program's survival guide to the virtual interview season. Acad Radiol 2020; 27 (09) 1294-1297
• 7 Nesemeier BR, Lebo NL, Schmalbach CE. et al. Impact of the covid-19 global pandemic on the otolaryngology fellowship application process. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 163 (04) 712-713
• 8 Menhaji K, Gaigbe-Togbe BH, Hardart A. et al. Virtual interviews during covid-19: Perspectives of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery program directors. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2020
• 9 Ehrlich H, Boneva D, Mckenney M, Elkbuli A. Virtual interviews for the 2020–2021 national residency matching program during the covid-19 pandemic: A curse or blessing?. Am Surg 2020; 85 (04) 700-701
• 10 Hill MV, Ross EA, Crawford D. et al. Program and candidate experience with virtual interviews for the 2020 Complex General Surgical Oncology interview season during the COVID pandemic. Am J Surg 2020; S0002-9610 (20)30730-3
• 11 Susarla SM, Swanson EW, Slezak S, Lifchez SD, Redett RJ. The perception and costs of the interview process for plastic surgery residency programs: Can the process be streamlined?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 302e-309e
• 12 Bird SB, Hern HG, Blomkalns A. et al. Innovation in residency selection: The AAMC standardized video interview. Acad Med 2019; 94 (10) 1489-1497
• 13 Quillen DA, Siatkowski RM, Feldon S. of the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. Covid-19 and the ophthalmology match. Ophthalmology 2021; 128 (02) 181-184
• 14 Christiansen SM, Osher JM, Riemann CD. Association of mentor-to-program contact and applicant rank disclosure with vitreoretinal fellowship applicant's final match outcome in 2016 and 2017. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018; 136 (06) 642-647
• 15 Daram SR, Wu R, Tang SJ. Interview from anywhere: feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109 (02) 155-159
• 16 Edje L, Miller C, Kiefer J, Oram D. Using skype as an alternative for residency selection interviews. J Grad Med Educ 2013; 5 (03) 503-505
• 17 Miotto GC. Tele-interview in the aesthetic fellowship selection process. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (11) NP175-NP177
• 18 Venincasa MJ, Cai LZ, Gedde SJ, Uhler T, Sridhar J. Current applicant perceptions of the ophthalmology residency match. JAMA Ophthalmol 2020; 138 (05) 460-466
• 19 Hariton E, Bortoletto P, Ayogu N. Using video-conference interviews in the residency application process. Acad Med 2017; 92 (06) 728-729
• 20 Zafar S, Bressler NM, Golnik KC. et al. Fellowship match outcomes in the U.S. from 2010 to 2017: analysis of San Francisco Match. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 218: 261-267
• 21 Pourmand A, Lee H, Fair M, Maloney K, Caggiula A. Feasibility and usability of tele-interview for medical residency interview. West J Emerg Med 2018; 19 (01) 80-86
• 22 Williams K, Kling JM, Labonte HR, Blair JE. Videoconference interviewing: Tips for success. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 (03) 331-333
• 23 Healy WL, Bedair H. Videoconference interviews for an adult reconstruction fellowship: lessons learned. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (21) e114