PDF icon PDF herunterladen
Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2007; 28(04): 4-6
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733233
Editorial

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cervical Cancer

S.V.S Deo
Department of Surgical Oncology, IRCH, All India Institute of Medicla Sciences, New Delhi, India
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar aufeRef
 als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints
Preview Container


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. März 2022

© 2007. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 A. Nandkumar PC. Gupta, P. Gangadharan. P.N. Visweswara. ICMR-NCCH Development of an atlas of cancer In India. First All India Report: 2001-2002
  • 2 Tanaka Y. Sawada S. Murata T. Relationship between lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients irradiated postoperatively for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Radiol Oncol 1 $81:23:455- 459
  • 3 Inoue T. Morita K . The prognostic signifi cance of number of positive nodes in cervical carcinoma stages ID. HA. and UB. Cancer 1990:65:1923-1927.
  • 4 Lee KB. Lee JM, Park CY. Lymph node metastasis and lymph vascular space invasion in mJcroinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix, int J Gynecol Cancer 2006:16:1164-1187.
  • 5 Garlpagapglu M. Tulunay G, Rose MF. et al. Prognostic factors in stage W HA cervical carcinomas treated with postoperative radiotherapy. Eur ./ Gynaecol Oncol 1999:20:131 135.
  • 6 Lai CH. Hung JH, Hsueh S. et al. Preoperative prognostic variables and the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of stage ID or 11 cervical carcinoma patients with or without pelvic lymph node metastasis. Cancer 1999:85:1537 1546
  • 7 inoue T. Morita K The prognostic signifi cance of number of positive nodes in cervical carcinoma stages IB. IIA. and 11 B Cancer 1990:65:1923-1927.
  • 8 Sakuragi K Satoh C. Takeda .V. et al. Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in stages IB. HA and IID cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer 1999:85:1547-1554.
  • 9 Morice P. Castaigne D. Pautier P. et al. Interest of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage IB and II cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1999:73:106-110.
  • 10 Takeda N. Sakuragi N, Takeda M, et al. Multivariate analysis of histopathologic prognostic factors for invasive cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic retroperitoneal iymphadenectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Brand 2002:81:1144-1151
  • 11 Doss EA. Barents?.10. Massnger LFAG. et al. The rn/e of MR imaging In invasive cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2000:10:256-270
  • 12 Bipat S, Glas AS. van der Vclden ./, et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2003:91:59- 66.
  • 13 Chou HU. Chang TC. Yon TC. et al. Low value of flUFJ- tluoro-g-deoxy-Dglucose positron omission tomography in primary staging of early-stage cervical cancer he fore radical hysterectomy J Clin Oncol 2006:24:123 128.
  • 14 Levcnback C, Burke TW. Gershenson DM. et al Intraoperative lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer. Obstet Gynecol 19MM: 163-167
  • 15 Burke TW. Levenhack C. Tornos C. et al. Intra abdominal lymphatic mapping to direct selective pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high- risk endometrial cancer: results of a pilot study Gynecol Oncol 1996:63:169 173.
  • 16 Hob L. Strnad !’. Rohova 11. et al. Study of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005:98:281-288.
  • 17 Marnttz S. Kohler C. Hongardt S. et al. German Association of Gynecologic Oncologists (AGO). Topographic distribution of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:35-41
  • 18 Levenback C. Coleman HL. Burke T\V. ct al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in patients with cervix cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. ./ Clin Oncol 2002;20:688-693.
  • 19 Plante M. Renaud MC, Tetu H. et al. Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping in earlystage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;91:494-503
  • 20 Balm M, llaji AG. Kumar DKV et al. Sentinel node biopsy in cervicol cancer-A pilot study Ind J A led A Paed Oncology 2007:28:813.