PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2021; 42(02): 208-212
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732819
Case Report with Review of Literature

Managing Life-Threatening Malignant Superior Mediastinal Syndrome in Pregnancy: When Benefits of Radiation and Chemotherapy Outweigh the Risks—A Case Report and Review of Literature

Aashima Arora
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
,
Gaurav Prakash 
2   Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
,
Rashmi Bagga
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
,
Radhika Srinivasan
3   Department of Cytopathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
,
Arihant Jain 
2   Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
› Institutsangaben
Funding Nil.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
  Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

There is scarce literature on managing superior mediastinal syndrome during pregnancy. We report a case of 26-year-old primigravida who presented with life-threatening superior mediastinal syndrome at 32 weeks of gestation. The diagnosis was significantly delayed and, as a result, she reached the emergency with stridor and impending respiratory failure. She was diagnosed with primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma Lugano Stage II with a bulky mediastinal mass. She was treated with chemoimmunotherapy and underwent a preterm vaginal delivery after a week. She delivered a 1.6 kg healthy child with no malformations. Later, she completed three cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone and five cycles of dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisolone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, rituximab, followed by radiotherapy. She continues to be in remission at 18 months of follow-up. Delaying diagnostic imaging that involves ionizing radiation exposure and chemotherapy to avoid teratogenic and obstetric complications during pregnancy can adversely affect the prognosis in certain patients with high-grade malignancies. On the contrary, prompt multidisciplinary management can lead to a gratifying outcome.

Keywords

pregnancy - lymphoma - radiation - chemotherapy


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. August 2021

© 2021. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Stensheim H, Møller B, van Dijk T, Fosså SD. Cause-specific survival for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy or lactation: a registry-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (01) 45-51
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Djakovic A, Ott G, Zollner U, Vordermark D, Dietl J. [Mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma with symptomatic superior vena cava syndrome in a patient with bichorial twin pregnancy in the 26th week of gestation: peri-and postpartal management – a case report]. Zentralbl Gynäkol 2005; 127 (04) 248-251
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Obeidat OS, Baniissa BA, Shkoukani ZW, Alhouri AN. Mediastinal lymphoma-induced superior vena cava syndrome and chylopericardium in a pregnant lady: a case report. Avicenna J Med 2019; 10 (02) 89-92
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Mangasarova JK, Kravchenko SK, Magomedova AU, Baryakh E, Vorobiev VI, Savchenko VG. Pregnancy and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2015; 126 (23) 5069-5069
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ratnapalan S, Bona N, Chandra K, Koren G. Physicians’ perceptions of teratogenic risk associated with radiography and CT during early pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (05) 1107-1109
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Lowe S. Diagnostic imaging in pregnancy: making informed decisions. Obstet Med 2019; 12 (03) 116-122
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Barzilai M, Avivi I, Amit O. Hematological malignancies during pregnancy. Mol Clin Oncol 2019; 10 (01) 3-9
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 De Santis M, Di Gianantonio E, Straface G. et al. Ionizing radiations in pregnancy and teratogenesis: a review of literature. Reprod Toxicol 2005; 20 (03) 323-329
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Streffer C, Shore R, Konermann G. et al. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 2003; 33 (01/02) 5-206
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995). Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 (03) 647-651
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Gjelsteen AC, Ching BH, Meyermann MW. et al. CT, MRI, PET, PET/CT, and ultrasound in the evaluation of obstetric and gynecologic patients. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88 (02) 361-390
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Tremblay E, Thérasse E, Thomassin-Naggara I, Trop I. Quality initiatives: guidelines for use of medical imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Radiographics 2012; 32 (03) 897-911
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Groen RS, Bae JY, Lim KJ. Fear of the unknown: ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (06) 456-462
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) e210-e216
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Pereg D, Koren G, Lishner M. The treatment of Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in pregnancy. Haematologica 2007; 92 (09) 1230-1237
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Brenner B, Avivi I, Lishner M. Haematological cancers in pregnancy. Lancet 2012; 379 (9815) 580-587
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Evens AM, Advani R, Press OW. et al. Lymphoma occurring during pregnancy: antenatal therapy, complications, and maternal survival in a multicenter analysis. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31 (32) 4132-4139
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Gziri MM, Debiève F, DE Catte L. et al. Chemotherapy during pregnancy: effect of anthracyclines on fetal and maternal cardiac function. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91 (12) 1465-1468
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Giulino-Roth L. How I treat primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2018; 132 (08) 782-790
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Malenda A, Kołkowska-Leśniak A, Puła B. et al. Outcomes of treatment with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R or R-CHOP in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 2020; 104 (01) 59-66
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Chan EHL, Koh LP, Lee J. et al. Real world experience of R-CHOP with or without consolidative radiotherapy vs DA-EPOCH-R in the first-line treatment of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Med 2019; 8 (10) 4626-4632
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar