PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2021; 13(04): 374-379
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732489
Original Article

Evaluation of the Performance of Direct Susceptibility Test by VITEK-2 from Positively Flagged Blood Culture Broth for Gram-Negative Bacilli

D Kavipriya
1   Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
,
Suman Susan Prakash
1   Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
,
Sarumathi Dhandapani
1   Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
,
Deepashree Rajshekar
1   Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
,
Apurba Sankar Sastry
1   Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Timely initiation of antimicrobial therapy in patients with blood stream infection is absolutely necessary to reduce mortality and morbidity. Most clinical microbiology laboratories use conventional methods for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) that involve biochemical methods for identification followed by AST by disk diffusion. The aim of the current study is to assess the various errors associated with direct susceptibility testing done from blood culture broth using automated AST system-Vitek-2 compact compared with the reference method of AST done from bacterial colonies.

Materials and Methods The study was conducted in a tertiary care public sector 2,200-bedded hospital in South India for a period of 6 months. The study involved positively flagged blood culture bottles that yielded single morphotype of Gram-negative organism by Gram stain. A total of 120 bacterial isolates were collected that consisted of consecutively obtained first 60 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae family (30 Escherichia coli and 30 Klebsiella pneumoniae) and consecutively obtained first 60 nonfermenters (30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 30 Acinetobacter baumannii). Vitek-2 AST was done from these 120 blood culture broth, following the protocol by Biomerieux, and results were obtained. Then, Vitek-2 was done from colonies (reference method) using appropriate panel for Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenters, and results were obtained. Both the results were compared.

Results Nonfermenters showed a better categorical agreement of 97.6%, as compared to Enterobacteriaceae, which showed 97%. Among Enterobacteriaceae, both E. coli and K. pneumoniae showed categorical agreement of 97% each.

Conclusion The procedure of AST directly from blood culture broth represents a simple and effective technique that can reduce the turnaround time by 24 hours, which in turn benefits the clinician in appropriate utilization of antimicrobials for better patient care.

Keywords

antimicrobial susceptibility testing - bloodstream infections - categorical agreement - essential agreement - Enterobacteriaceae - nonfermenters - Vitek-2


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Juli 2021

© 2021. The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Lemos TC, Cogo LL, Maestri AC, Hadad M, Nogueira KDS. Is it possible to perform bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing with a positive blood culture bottle for quick diagnosis of bloodstream infections?. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2018; 51 (02) 215-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Klouche M, Schröder U. Rapid methods for diagnosis of bloodstream infections. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008; 46 (07) 888-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Søgaard M, Nørgaard M, Schønheyder HC. First notification of positive blood cultures and the high accuracy of the gram stain report. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45 (04) 1113-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nain J, Deepashree R, Tamang P. et al Comparison of four different methods of smear preparation for gram staining of positively flagged automated blood culture bottles. J Curr Res Sci Med 2018; 4 (02) 98
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE. et al Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (06) 1589-1596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rajshekar D, Chaudhari KV, Bhat P. et al Evaluation of performance of direct disk diffusion test from positively flagged blood culture broth: a large scale study from South India. J Lab Physicians 2019; 11 (02) 154-160
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hazelton B, Thomas LC, Olma T. et al Rapid and accurate direct antibiotic susceptibility testing of blood culture broths using MALDI Sepsityper combined with the BD Phoenix automated system. J Med Microbiol 2014; 63 (Pt 12) 1590-1594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Heather CS, Maley M. Automated direct screening for resistance of Gram-negative blood cultures using the BD Kiestra WorkCell. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2018; 37 (01) 117-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Coyle MB, McGonagle LA, Plorde JJ, Clausen CR, Schoenknecht FD. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates from blood cultures by direct inoculation and early reading of disk diffusion tests. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 20 (03) 473-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jorgensen JH. Selection criteria for an antimicrobial susceptibility testing system. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31 (11) 2841-2844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 std . ISO 20776–1:2006—Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems-Susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices—part 2: Evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/41631.html. Accessed June 17, 2021/std
  • 12 Jenkins SG, Schuetz AN. Current concepts in laboratory testing to guide antimicrobial therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 2012; 87 (03) 290-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hogan CA, Watz N, Budvytiene I, Banaei N. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by VITEK®2 directly from blood cultures in patients with Gram-negative rod bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 94 (02) 116-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Coorevits L, Boelens J, Claeys G. Direct susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on clinical samples: a rapid and accurate tool for antibiotic stewardship. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015; 34 (06) 1207-1212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Barnini S, Brucculeri V, Morici P, Ghelardi E, Florio W, Lupetti A. A new rapid method for direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from positive blood cultures. BMC Microbiol 2016; 16 (01) 185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Maelegheer K, Nulens E. Same-day identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures: a simple and inexpensive procedure. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2017; 36 (04) 681-687
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Mauri C, Principe L, Bracco S. et al Identification by mass spectrometry and automated susceptibility testing from positive bottles: a simple, rapid, and standardized approach to reduce the turnaround time in the management of blood cultures. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17 (01) 749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pan H, Li W, Li R, Li Y, Zhang Y, Sun E. Simple sample preparation method for direct microbial identification and susceptibility testing from positive blood cultures. Front Microbiol 2019; 05 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00481.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Machen A, Drake T, Wang YF. Same day identification and full panel antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from positive blood culture bottles made possible by a combined lysis-filtration method with MALDI-TOF VITEK mass spectrometry and the VITEK2 system. PLoS One 2014; 9 (02) e87870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Höring S, Massarani AS, Löffler B, Rödel J. Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing in blood culture diagnostics performed by direct inoculation using the VITEK®-2 and BD Phoenix™ platforms. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 38 (03) 471-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar