Researcher Perceptions of a Self-Service Online Portal to Facilitate Volunteer Recruitment into Clinical Trials

Abstract

Background Recruitment of volunteers is a major challenge for clinical trials. There has been increasing development and use of Internet-based portals in recruitment for clinical research. There has been little research on researcher use and perceptions of these portals.

Objectives This study evaluated researcher perceptions of use of Rally, an Internet-based portal for clinical trial volunteer recruitment.

Methods A cross-sectional survey was developed and implemented to understand researcher perceptions. From theoretical models of information technology use, the survey adopted items in four domains: ease of use, usefulness, facilitating conditions, and self-efficacy. The dependent variable was researchers' behavioral intention to use Rally. The survey captured characteristics of researchers such as gender, age, and role. It was implemented using the REDCap survey tool. An email invitation followed by three reminders was sent to researchers. A hierarchical regression model was applied to assess predictors of behavioral intention.

Results The survey response rate was 35.6% (152 surveys received from 427 contacted researchers). In the hierarchical regression model, facilitating conditions and self-efficacy predicted behavioral intention (F (4,94) = 6.478; p <0.001). The model explained 21.6% of the variance in behavioral intention (R-square change = 21.3%, p <0.001).

Conclusion Facilitating conditions and self-efficacy predicted researchers' behavioral intention to use Rally for volunteer recruitment into clinical trials. Future research should document best practices and strategies for enhancing researcher use of online portals for volunteer recruitment.

Keywords

internet portal - recruitment - clinical trial - researcher perceptions - digital solutions

• References

• 1 McDonald AM, Treweek S, Shakur H. et al. Using a business model approach and marketing techniques for recruitment to clinical trials. Trials 2011; 12 (01) 74
• 2 Huang GD, Bull J, Johnston McKee K, Mahon E, Harper B, Roberts JN. CTTI Recruitment Project Team. Clinical trials recruitment planning: a proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 66 (66) 74-79
• 3 Bower P, Brueton V, Gamble C. et al. Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities. Trials 2014; 15 (01) 399
• 4 Davis JM, Sandgren AJ, Manley AR, Daleo MA, Smith SS. Optimizing clinical trial enrollment methods through “goal programming.”. Appl Clin Trials 2014; 23 (6-7): 46-50
• 5 Pew Research Center. Technology adoption climbs among older adults. Accessed November 17, 2020 at: https://www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/
• 6 Rosa C, Campbell ANC, Miele GM, Brunner M, Winstanley EL. Using e-technologies in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2015; 45 (Pt A): 41-54
• 7 Accessed November 17, 2020 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/
• 8 Zarin DA, Tse T, Williams RJ, Carr S. Trial reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov-the final rule. N Engl J Med 2016; 375 (20) 1998-2004
• 9 Trials Today. Accessed November 17, 2020 at: https://www.trialstoday.org/
• 10 Clinical and Translational Science Institute. StudyFinder tool continues national expansion enabling public to explore studies at academic research institutions. University of Minnesota; Accessed November 17, 2020 at: https://www.ctsi.umn.edu/news-and-events/news/ctsi%E2%80%99s-studyfinder-tool-continues-national-expansion-enabling-public-explore-studies-academic-research-institutions
• 11 Wu DT, Hanauer DA, Mei Q. et al. Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (02) 269-275
• 12 Williams RJ, Woloshin S, Gentile A, Rosenfeld SJ, Morgan SA. Website functionality panel. Accessed December 16, 2020 at: https://prsinfo.clinicaltrials.gov/modernization/WebsiteFunctionalityPanel.pdf
• 13 Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q 1989; 13 (03) 319-340
• 14 Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989; 35 (08) 982-1003
• 15 Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manage Inf Syst Q 2003; 27: 425-478
• 16 Holden RJ, Karsh B-T. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43 (01) 159-172
• 17 Tavares J, Oliveira T. Electronic health record patient portal adoption by health care consumers: an acceptance model and survey. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (03) e49
• 18 Emani S, Healey M, Ting DY. et al. Awareness and use of the after-visit summary through a patient portal: Evaluation of patient characteristics and an application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (04) e77
• 19 Emani S, Peters E, Desai S. et al. Perceptions of adopters versus non-adopters of a patient portal: an application of diffusion of innovation theory. JHI 2018; 25 (03) 149
• 20 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
• 21 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
• 22 Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2nd ed.. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2005
• 23 Adams M, Caffrey L, McKevitt C. Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre. Health Res Policy Syst 2015; 13 (01) 8
• 24 Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed.. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003
• 25 Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press; 2010
• 26 Harris PA, Scott KW, Lebo L, Hassan N, Lightner C, Pulley J. ResearchMatch: a national registry to recruit volunteers for clinical research. Acad Med 2012; 87 (01) 66-73
• 27 Pulley JM, Jerome RN, Bernard GR. et al. Connecting the public with clinical trial options: the ResearchMatch Trials Today tool. J Clin Transl Sci 2018; 2 (04) 253-257
• 28 Tabriz AA, Fleming PJ, Shin Y. et al. Challenges and opportunities using online portals to recruit diverse patients to behavioral trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (12) 1637-1644