Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Anastomotic Leak

Abstract

Chronic anastomotic leaks present a daunting challenge to colorectal surgeons. Unfortunately, anastomotic leaks are common, and a significant number of leaks are diagnosed in a delayed fashion. The clinical presentation of these chronic leaks can be silent or have low grade, indolent symptoms. Operative options can be quite formidable and highly complex. Leaks are typically diagnosed by radiographic and endoscopic imaging during the preoperative assessment prior to defunctioning stoma reversal. The operative strategy depends on the location of the anastomosis and the specific features of the anastomotic dehiscence. Low colorectal anastomosis (i.e. following low anterior resection) may require a transanal approach, transabdominal approach, or a combination of the two. While restoration of bowel continuity is encouraged, it is not infrequent for a permanent ostomy to be required to maximize patient quality of life.

Keywords

chronic anastomotic leak - anastomotic leak - pelvic abscess - anastomotic sinus - reoperative pelvic surgery

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. November 2021

• References

• 1 Borstlap WAA, Westerduin E, Aukema TS, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Dutch G. Dutch Snapshot Research Group. Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus formation after low anterior resection: results from a large cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (05) 870-877
• 2 Borstlap WAA, Westerduin E, Aukema TS, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Dutch Snapshot Research Group. Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus formation after low anterior resection: results from a large cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (05) 870-877
• 3 Zhuo C, Trencheva K, Maggiori L. et al. Experience of a specialist centre in the management of anastomotic sinus following leaks after low rectal or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting stoma. Colorectal. Dis 2013; 15 (11) 1429-1435
• 4 Swain BT, Ellis CN. Fibrin glue treatment of low rectal and pouch-anal anastomotic sinuses. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47 (02) 253-255
• 5 Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T, Spelsberg F, Jauch KW. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a new method. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (08) 1818-1825
• 6 Kabul Gürbulak E, Akgün İE, Öz A. et al. Minimal invasive management of anastomosis leakage after colon resection. Case Rep Med 2015; 2015: 374072
• 7 Haito-Chavez Y, Law JK, Kratt T. et al. International multicenter experience with an over-the-scope clipping device for endoscopic management of GI defects (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80 (04) 610-622
• 8 Kobayashi H, Kikuchi A, Okazaki S. et al. Over-the-scope-clipping system for anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: report of two cases. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (24) 7984-7987
• 9 Robertson C, Savioli F, Shalli K. A novel endoscopic treatment for anastomotic leakage post anterior resection: Padlock over the scope clip. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33 (01) 91-93
• 10 Radziunas G, Dulskas A, Aliosin O, Lunevicius R, Samalavicius NE. The over-the-scope clipping system for treatment of chronic coloenteric fistula: a case report. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13: 219
• 11 Arezzo A, Verra M, Reddavid R, Cravero F, Bonino MA, Morino M. Efficacy of the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) for treatment of colorectal postsurgical leaks and fistulas. Surg Endosc 2012; 26 (11) 3330-3333
• 12 Whitlow CB, Opelka FG, Gathright Jr JB, Beck DE. Treatment of colorectal and ileoanal anastomotic sinuses. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40 (07) 760-763
• 13 Stewart BT, Stitz RW. Marsupialization of presacral collections with use of an endoscopic stapler. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42 (02) 264-265
• 14 Brehant O, Hanes A, Fuks D. et al. Stapled marsupialisation of chronic low rectal anastomotic sinuses. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24 (10) 1233-1237
• 15 Alsanea N, Alabbad S. Use of the endostapler for the treatment of non-healing sinus secondary to a dehisced colorectal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 2010; 14 (03) 249-251
• 16 Khan AA, Wheeler JMD, Cunningham C, George B, Kettlewell M, Mortensen NJMC. The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10 (06) 587-592
• 17 den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC. et al; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8 (04) 297-303
• 18 da Silva G, Boutros M, Wexner SD. Role of prophylactic ureteric stents in colorectal surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg 2012; 5 (03) 105-110
• 19 Coakley KM, Kasten KR, Sims SM, Prasad T, Heniford BT, Davis BR. Prophylactic ureteral catheters for colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement program-based analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61 (01) 84-88
• 20 Genser L, Manceau G, Karoui M. et al. Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (06) 747-755
• 21 Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Maggiori L, Ferron M, Alves A, Panis Y. Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a valuable surgical challenge. Surgery 2011; 149 (01) 65-71
• 22 Cutait DE, Figliolini FJ. A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1961; 4: 335-342
• 23 Turnbull Jr. RB, Cuthbertson A. Abdominorectal pull-through resection for cancer and for Hirschsprung's disease. Delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Cleve Clin Q 1961; 28: 109-115
• 24 Remzi FH, El Gazzaz G, Kiran RP, Kirat HT, Fazio VW. Outcomes following Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through compared with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 2009; 96 (04) 424-429
• 25 Kirwan WO, Turnbull Jr. RB, Fazio VW, Weakley FL. Pullthrough operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1978; 65 (10) 695-698
• 26 Cutait DE, Cutait R, Ioshimoto M, Hyppólito da Silva J, Manzione A. Abdominoperineal endoanal pull-through resection. A comparative study between immediate and delayed colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28 (05) 294-299
• 27 Olagne E, Baulieux J, de la Roche E. et al. Functional results of delayed coloanal anastomosis after preoperative radiotherapy for lower third rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191 (06) 643-649
• 28 Facy O, Lagoutte N, Jambet S. et al. [After low anterior rectal resection, colonic pull-through with delayed colo-anal anastomosis can avoid the need for a diverting ileostomy] (in French). J Chir (Paris) 2009; 146 (05) 458-463
• 29 Jarry J, Faucheron JL, Moreno W, Bellera CA, Evrard S. Delayed colo-anal anastomosis is an alternative to prophylactic diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal carcinomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37 (02) 127-133
• 30 Jarry J, Faucheron JL. Laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection with transanal colonic pull-through and delayed coloanal anastomosis: a new approach to adult Hirschsprung disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (10) 1313-1319
• 31 Sneider E, Maykel J. Management of anastomotic leak after low anterior resection with transanal endoscopic microsurgical (TEM) debridement and repair. J Surg Case Rep 2012; 2012 (09) 1
• 32 Borstlap WAA, Harran N, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA. Feasibility of the TAMIS technique for redo pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (12) 5364-5371
• 33 Dapri G, Guta D, Grozdev K. et al. Colorectal anastomotic leakage corrected by transanal laparoscopy. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18 (06) O210-O213
• 34 Lazzar C, Currò G, Komaei I, Barbera A, Navarra G. Favorable management of low colorectal anastomotic leakage with transanal conventional and endoscopic drainage (GelPOINT Path Transanal Access Platform). Surg Technol Int 2018; 33: 119-126
• 35 Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S. et al; Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg 2019; 269 (04) 700-711
• 36 Cibula D, Zikan M, Fischerova D. et al. Pelvic floor reconstruction by modified rectus abdominis myoperitoneal (MRAM) flap after pelvic exenterations. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 144 (03) 558-563
• 37 Spasojevic M, Mariathasan AB, Goscinski M. et al. Vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap repair improves perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for irradiated locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25 (05) 1357-1365
• 38 Touny A, Othman H, Maamoon S, Ramzy S, Elmarakby H. Perineal reconstruction using pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM). J Surg Oncol 2014; 110 (06) 752-757
• 39 Hinojosa MW, Parikh DA, Menon R, Wirth GA, Stamos MJ, Mills S. Recent experience with abdominal perineal resection with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction after preoperative pelvic radiation. Am Surg 2009; 75 (10) 995-999
• 40 Winterton RIS, Lambe GF, Ekwobi C. et al. Gluteal fold flaps for perineal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (03) 397-405
• 41 Vermaas M, Ferenschild FTJ, Hofer SOP, Verhoef C, Eggermont AMM, de Wilt JHW. Primary and secondary reconstruction after surgery of the irradiated pelvis using a gracilis muscle flap transposition. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31 (09) 1000-1005
• 42 Persichetti P, Cogliandro A, Marangi GF. et al. Pelvic and perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: the role of gracilis flap. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59 (02) 168-172
• 43 Johnstone MS. Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous versus alternative flaps for perineal repair after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (01) 101-106