Mechanical Anastomotic Coupling Device versus Hand-sewn Venous Anastomosis in Head and Neck Reconstruction—An Analysis of 1694 Venous Anastomoses

Abstract

Background There is a steep learning curve to attain a consistently good result in microvascular surgery. The venous anastomosis is a critical step in free-tissue transfer. The margin of error is less and the outcome depends on the surgeon’s skill and technique. Mechanical anastomotic coupling device (MACD) has been proven to be an effective alternative to hand-sewn (HS) technique for venous anastomosis, as it requires lesser skill. However, its feasibility of application in emerging economy countries is yet to be established.

Material and Method We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent free-tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction between July 2015 and October 2020. Based on the technique used for the venous anastomosis, the patients were divided into an HS technique and MACD group. Patient characteristics and outcomes were measured.

Result A total of 1694 venous anastomoses were performed during the study period. There were 966 patients in the HS technique group and 719 in the MACD group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, prior radiotherapy, prior surgery, and comorbidities. Venous thrombosis was noted in 62 (6.4%) patients in the HS technique group and 7 (0.97%) in the MACD group (p = 0.000). The mean time taken for venous anastomosis in the HS group was 17 ± 4 minutes, and in the MACD group, it was 5 ± 2 minutes (p = 0.0001). Twenty-five (2.56%) patients in the HS group and 4 (0.55%) patients in MACD group had flap loss (p = 0.001).

Conclusion MACD is an effective alternative for HS technique for venous anastomosis. There is a significant reduction in anastomosis time, flap loss, and return to operation theater due to venous thrombosis. MACD reduces the surgeon’s strain, especially in a high-volume center. Prospective randomized studies including economic analysis are required to prove the cost-effectiveness of coupler devices.

Keywords

microsurgery - microvascular coupling device - free tissue transfer - free flaps - venous anastomosis - microvascular anastomosis - technique - head and neck reconstruction

Publication History

Article published online:
05 July 2021

• References

• 1 Gabrysz-Forget F, Tabet P, Rahal A, Bissada E, Christopoulos A, Ayad T. Free versus pedicled flaps for reconstruction of head and neck cancer defects: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 48 (01) 13
• 2 Copelli C, Tewfik K, Cassano L. et al. Management of free flap failure in head and neck surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2017; 37 (05) 387-392
• 3 Maruccia M, Fatigato G, Elia R. et al. Microvascular coupler device versus hand-sewn venous anastomosis: A systematic review of the literature and data meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (05) 608-617
• 4 Head LK, McKay DR. Economic comparison of hand-sutured and coupler-assisted microvascular anastomoses. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (01) 71-76
• 5 Ruiz-Cases A, Salmerón-González E, Pérez-García A, Esteban-Vico JR, García-Vilariño E. Smaller diameter anastomotic coupling devices have higher rates of venous thrombosis in microvascular free tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (03) 417e-418e
• 6 Zhu Z, Wang X, Huang J. et al. Mechanical versus hand-sewn venous anastomoses in free flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (05) 1272-1281
• 7 Senthil Murugan M, Ravi P, Mohammed Afradh K, Tatineni V, Krishnakumar Raja VB. Comparison of the efficacy of venous coupler and hand-sewn anastomosis in maxillofacial reconstruction using microvascular fibula free flaps: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 47 (07) 854-857
• 8 DeLacure MD, Kuriakose MA, Spies AL. Clinical experience in end-to-side venous anastomoses with a microvascular anastomotic coupling device in head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125 (08) 869-872
• 9 Sullivan SK, Dellacroce F, Allen R. Management of significant venous discrepancy with microvascular venous coupler. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (06) 377-380
• 10 Fitzgerald O’Connor E, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M. et al. The microvascular anastomotic coupler for venous anastomoses in free flap breast reconstruction improves outcomes. Gland Surg 2016; 5 (02) 88-92
• 11 Yap LH, Constantinides J, Butler CE. Venous thrombosis in coupled versus sutured microvascular anastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (06) 666-669
• 12 Patel SA, Pang JH, Natoli N, Gallagher S, Topham N. Reliability of venous couplers for microanastomosis of the venae comitantes in free radial forearm flaps for head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (07) 433-436
• 13 Umezawa H, Ogawa R, Nakamizo M, Yokoshima K, Hyakusoku H. A comparison of microsurgical venous anastomosis techniques. J Nippon Med Sch 2015; 82 (01) 14-20
• 14 Kulkarni AR, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL. et al. Venous thrombosis in handsewn versus coupled venous anastomoses in 857 consecutive breast free flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (03) 178-182
• 15 Assoumane A, Wang L, Liu K, Shang ZJ. Use of couplers for vascular anastomoses in 601 free flaps for reconstruction of defects of the head and neck: technique and two-year retrospective clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 55 (05) 461-464
• 16 Hanson SE, Mitchell MB, Palivela N. et al. Smaller diameter anastomotic coupling devices have higher rates of venous thrombosis in microvascular free tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (06) 1293-1300
• 17 Zhou W, Zhang WB, Yu Y. et al. Risk factors for free flap failure: a retrospective analysis of 881 free flaps for head and neck defect reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46 (08) 941-945
• 18 Stranix JT, Rifkin WJ, Lee ZH. et al. Comparison of hand-sewn versus coupled venous anastomoses in traumatic lower extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (01) 31-36