Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731358
Osteossíntese minimamente invasiva com placa para fraturas de clavícula[*]
Article in several languages: português | English
Resumo
Objetivo Analisar o resultado radiológico, clínico e funcional das fraturas da clavícula, tratadas pela técnica de osteossíntese com placa minimamente invasiva (MIPO).
Métodos De junho de 2018 a julho de 2019, um total de 17 casos de fraturas claviculares foram tratadas com a técnica de osteossíntese com placa minimamente invasiva (MIPO), sob fluoroscopia com o braço em C. Os resultados funcionais foram avaliados por meio do escore de Constant-Murley e pelo escore de incapacidade do braço, ombro e mão (DASH). Foram analisados os resultados clínicos de consolidação, complicações, tempo cirúrgico, permanência hospitalar e infecção.
Resultados O tempo médio de acompanhamento neste estudo foi de 10,41 ± 1,75 meses (variação, 8 a 14 meses). Havia 11 pacientes do sexo masculino e seis do feminino, com média de idade de 39,05 ± 10,76 anos (variação de 22 a 57 anos). Todas as fraturas se consolidaram no tempo médio de 15,35 ± 3,08 semanas (variação, 12 a 20 semanas). O tempo cirúrgico médio foi de 98,11 ± 13,83 minutos (variação, 70 a 130), sendo a permanência hospitalar média de 4,7 ± 1,12 dias (variação de 3 a 7). O escore de Constant-Murley médio foi de 74,82 ± 6,36 no 4° mês e 92,35 ± 5,48 no 8° mês do pós-operatório, o que foi estatisticamente significativo. O escore DASH médio foi de 9,94 ± 1,55 no 4° mês e 5,29 ± 1,85 na 8ª semana do pós-operatório, também sendo estatisticamente significativo. Um paciente apresentou infecção cutânea superficial no local da incisão.
Conclusões A técnica MIPO é um método alternativo para a fixação de fraturas da clavícula, porém é tecnicamente mais desafiador, já que necessita de instalações cirúrgicas mais bem equipadas.
Palavras-chave
clavícula - fraturas ósseas - procedimentos cirúrgicos minimamente invasivos - placas ósseas - fixação interna de fraturasSuporte Financeiro
Não houve suporte financeiro de fontes públicas, comerciais, ou sem fins lucrativos.
Contribuições dos Autores
Todos os autores contribuíram com a concepção e o desenho do estudo. A preparação do material, a coleta e a análise dos dados foram realizadas por P. Devkota, B.M. Acharya e N.M.S Pradhan. O primeiro rascunho do manuscrito foi escrito por P. Devkota, sendo que todos os autores comentaram as versões anteriores do manuscrito. Todos os autores leram e aprovaram o manuscrito final.
* Estudo realizado no Departamento de Ortopedia e Cirurgia do Trauma, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Patan Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Publication History
Received: 20 June 2020
Accepted: 01 December 2020
Article published online:
01 October 2021
© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1 Khan LA, Bradnock TJ, Scott C, Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (02) 447-460
- 2 Hehn FHS, Bonavides PSG, Oliveira Júnior AN, Silva HCG, Back Neto M, Stipp WN. Clinical Evaluation of the Surgical Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures at a Hospital in the South of Santa Catarina. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020; 55 (01) 100-105
- 3 Nordqvist A, Petersson C. The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (300) 127-132
- 4 Rowe CR. An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968; 58 (58) 29-42
- 5 Stanley D, Trowbridge EA, Norris SH. The mechanism of clavicular fracture. A clinical and biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70 (03) 461-464
- 6 Eskola A, Vainionpää S, Myllynen P, Pätiälä H, Rokkanen P. Outcome of clavicular fracture in 89 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986; 105 (06) 337-338
- 7 Andersen K, Jensen PO, Lauritzen J. Treatment of clavicular fractures. Figure-of-eight bandage versus a simple sling. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 58 (01) 71-74
- 8 Stanley D, Norris SH. Recovery following fractures of the clavicle treated conservatively. Injury 1988; 19 (03) 162-164
- 9 Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE. Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (07) 1359-1365
- 10 Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (04) 537-539
- 11 Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11 (05) 452-456
- 12 Souza NASM, Belangero PS, Figueiredo EA, Pochini AC, Andreoli CV, Ejnisman B. Displaced midshaft clavicle fracture in athletes - should we operate?. Rev Bras Ortop 2018; 53 (02) 171-175
- 13 Jiang H, Qu W. Operative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures using a locking compression plate: comparison between mini-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique and conventional open reduction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98 (06) 666-671
- 14 Robinson CM, Goudie EB, Murray IR. et al. Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (17) 1576-1584
- 15 Kundangar RS, Mohanty SP, Bhat NS. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in AO/OTA type B displaced clavicle fractures. Musculoskelet Surg 2019; 103 (02) 191-197
- 16 Zenni Jr EJ, Krieg JK, Rosen MJ. Open reduction and internal fixation of clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63 (01) 147-151
- 17 Millett PJ, Hurst JM, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ. Complications of clavicle fractures treated with intramedullary fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (01) 86-91
- 18 Jung GH, Park CM, Kim JD. Biologic fixation through bridge plating for comminuted shaft fracture of the clavicle: technical aspects and prospective clinical experience with a minimum of 12-month follow-up. Clin Orthop Surg 2013; 5 (04) 327-333
- 19 Lee HJ, Oh CW, Oh JK. et al. Percutaneous plating for comminuted midshaft fractures of the clavicle: a surgical technique to aid the reduction with nail assistance. Injury 2013; 44 (04) 465-470
- 20 Zhang T, Chen W, Sun J, Zhang Q, Zhang Y. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique for displaced midshaft clavicular fracture using the clavicle reductor. Int Orthop 2017; 41 (08) 1679-1683
- 21 Zhang Y, Xu J, Zhang C, Sun Y. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for midshaft clavicular fractures using superior anatomic plating. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25 (01) e7-e12
- 22 Sohn HS, Shon MS, Lee KH, Song SJ. Clinical comparison of two different plating methods in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for clavicular midshaft fractures: A randomized controlled trial. Injury 2015; 46 (11) 2230-2238
- 23 Phiphobmongkol V, Sommer C. Cases – Clavicle. In: Bast R, Bavonratanvavech S, Pesantez R. AOTrauma – Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis. 2nd ed.. New York: Thieme; 2012: 153-178
- 24 Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (214) 160-164
- 25 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. [corrected] Am J Ind Med 1996; 29 (06) 602-608
- 26 Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (01) 1-10
- 27 McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (08) 675-684
- 28 Perren SM. The technology of minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO). Injury 2002; 33 (Suppl. 01) VI-VII
- 29 Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures: a technique to aid fracture reduction and minimize complications. J Orthop Trauma 2012; 26 (10) 585-589
- 30 Ibrahim S, Meleppuram JJ. Retrospective study of superior anterior plate as a treatment for unstable (Neer type 2) distal clavicle fractures. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 53 (03) 306-313
- 31 Beirer M, Postl L, Crönlein M. et al. Does a minimal invasive approach reduce anterior chest wall numbness and postoperative pain in plate fixation of clavicle fractures?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 128
- 32 Kundangar R, Singh KA, Mohanty SP, Eshwari K. Clinical outcome of internal fixation of middle third clavicle fractures using locking compression plate: Comparison between open plating and MIPO. J Orthop 2019; 16 (05) 414-418
- 33 Wang X, Wang Z, Xia S, Fu B. Minimally invasive in the treatment of clavicle middle part fractures with locking reconstruction plate. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (07) 654-658
- 34 Kim MK, Lee HJ, You AH, Kang HYP. Pneumothorax after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for midshaft clavicle fracture: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (33) e16836