Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731358
Minimally-Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Clavicle Fractures[*]
Article in several languages: português | English
Abstract
Objective To analyze the radiological, clinical, and functional outcomes of clavicle fractures treated with the minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique.
Methods From June 2018 to July 2019, 17 cases of clavicular fractures were managed using the MIPO technique under C-arm fluoroscopy. The functional outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The clinical results of union, the complications, the operative time, the hospital stay, as well as infection, were analyzed.
Results The mean follow-up time was of 10.41 ± 1.75 months (range: 8 to 14 months). There were 11 male and 6 female patients, with a mean age of 39.05 ± 10.76 years (range: 22 to 57 years). All fractures united on the mean time of 15.35 ± 3.08 weeks (range: 12 to 20 weeks). The mean operative time was of 98.11 ± 13.83 minutes (range: 70 to 130 minutes), and the mean length of the hospital stay was of 4.7 ± 1.12 days (range: 3 to 7 days). The mean Constant-Murley score was of 74.82 ± 6.36 in 4th postoperstive month, and of 92.35 ± 5.48 in the 8th postoperative month, which was statistically significant. The mean DASH score was of 9.94 ± 1.55 in the 4th postoperative month, and of 5.29 ± 1.85 in the 8th postoperative month, which was also statistically significant. One patient had superficial skin infection at the site of the incision.
Conclusions The MIPO technique is an alternative method for the fixation of clavicle fractures, but it is technically more demanding, and requires well-equipped operating room facilities.
Keywords
clavicle - fractures, bone - minimally invasive surgical procedures - bone plates - fracture fixation, internalFinancial Support
There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by P. Devkota, B.M. Acharya, and N.M.S Pradhan. The first draft of the manuscript was written by P. Devkota, and all authors commented on previous versions of it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
* Study conducted at the Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Patan Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Publication History
Received: 20 June 2020
Accepted: 01 December 2020
Article published online:
01 October 2021
© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1 Khan LA, Bradnock TJ, Scott C, Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (02) 447-460
- 2 Hehn FHS, Bonavides PSG, Oliveira Júnior AN, Silva HCG, Back Neto M, Stipp WN. Clinical Evaluation of the Surgical Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures at a Hospital in the South of Santa Catarina. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020; 55 (01) 100-105
- 3 Nordqvist A, Petersson C. The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (300) 127-132
- 4 Rowe CR. An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968; 58 (58) 29-42
- 5 Stanley D, Trowbridge EA, Norris SH. The mechanism of clavicular fracture. A clinical and biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70 (03) 461-464
- 6 Eskola A, Vainionpää S, Myllynen P, Pätiälä H, Rokkanen P. Outcome of clavicular fracture in 89 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986; 105 (06) 337-338
- 7 Andersen K, Jensen PO, Lauritzen J. Treatment of clavicular fractures. Figure-of-eight bandage versus a simple sling. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 58 (01) 71-74
- 8 Stanley D, Norris SH. Recovery following fractures of the clavicle treated conservatively. Injury 1988; 19 (03) 162-164
- 9 Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE. Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (07) 1359-1365
- 10 Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (04) 537-539
- 11 Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11 (05) 452-456
- 12 Souza NASM, Belangero PS, Figueiredo EA, Pochini AC, Andreoli CV, Ejnisman B. Displaced midshaft clavicle fracture in athletes - should we operate?. Rev Bras Ortop 2018; 53 (02) 171-175
- 13 Jiang H, Qu W. Operative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures using a locking compression plate: comparison between mini-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique and conventional open reduction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98 (06) 666-671
- 14 Robinson CM, Goudie EB, Murray IR. et al. Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (17) 1576-1584
- 15 Kundangar RS, Mohanty SP, Bhat NS. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in AO/OTA type B displaced clavicle fractures. Musculoskelet Surg 2019; 103 (02) 191-197
- 16 Zenni Jr EJ, Krieg JK, Rosen MJ. Open reduction and internal fixation of clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63 (01) 147-151
- 17 Millett PJ, Hurst JM, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ. Complications of clavicle fractures treated with intramedullary fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (01) 86-91
- 18 Jung GH, Park CM, Kim JD. Biologic fixation through bridge plating for comminuted shaft fracture of the clavicle: technical aspects and prospective clinical experience with a minimum of 12-month follow-up. Clin Orthop Surg 2013; 5 (04) 327-333
- 19 Lee HJ, Oh CW, Oh JK. et al. Percutaneous plating for comminuted midshaft fractures of the clavicle: a surgical technique to aid the reduction with nail assistance. Injury 2013; 44 (04) 465-470
- 20 Zhang T, Chen W, Sun J, Zhang Q, Zhang Y. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique for displaced midshaft clavicular fracture using the clavicle reductor. Int Orthop 2017; 41 (08) 1679-1683
- 21 Zhang Y, Xu J, Zhang C, Sun Y. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for midshaft clavicular fractures using superior anatomic plating. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25 (01) e7-e12
- 22 Sohn HS, Shon MS, Lee KH, Song SJ. Clinical comparison of two different plating methods in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for clavicular midshaft fractures: A randomized controlled trial. Injury 2015; 46 (11) 2230-2238
- 23 Phiphobmongkol V, Sommer C. Cases – Clavicle. In: Bast R, Bavonratanvavech S, Pesantez R. AOTrauma – Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis. 2nd ed.. New York: Thieme; 2012: 153-178
- 24 Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (214) 160-164
- 25 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. [corrected] Am J Ind Med 1996; 29 (06) 602-608
- 26 Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (01) 1-10
- 27 McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (08) 675-684
- 28 Perren SM. The technology of minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO). Injury 2002; 33 (Suppl. 01) VI-VII
- 29 Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures: a technique to aid fracture reduction and minimize complications. J Orthop Trauma 2012; 26 (10) 585-589
- 30 Ibrahim S, Meleppuram JJ. Retrospective study of superior anterior plate as a treatment for unstable (Neer type 2) distal clavicle fractures. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 53 (03) 306-313
- 31 Beirer M, Postl L, Crönlein M. et al. Does a minimal invasive approach reduce anterior chest wall numbness and postoperative pain in plate fixation of clavicle fractures?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 128
- 32 Kundangar R, Singh KA, Mohanty SP, Eshwari K. Clinical outcome of internal fixation of middle third clavicle fractures using locking compression plate: Comparison between open plating and MIPO. J Orthop 2019; 16 (05) 414-418
- 33 Wang X, Wang Z, Xia S, Fu B. Minimally invasive in the treatment of clavicle middle part fractures with locking reconstruction plate. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (07) 654-658
- 34 Kim MK, Lee HJ, You AH, Kang HYP. Pneumothorax after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for midshaft clavicle fracture: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (33) e16836