Updates on the Management of Neurologic Complications of Post–Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

Yunis Mayasi; Romergryko G. Geocadin

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1731310

Seminars in Neurology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Semin Neurol 2021; 41(04): 388-397
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731310

Review Article

Updates on the Management of Neurologic Complications of Post–Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

Yunis Mayasi

¹Division of NeuroCritical Care, Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota-University of South Dakota Medical School, Sioux Falls, South Dakota

,

Romergryko G. Geocadin

²Division of Neurosciences Critical Care, Neurology, Neurosurgery and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in the United States, and survivors are frequently left with severe disability. Of the 10% successfully resuscitated from SCA, only around 10% of these live with a favorable neurologic outcome. Survivors of SCA commonly develop post–cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS). PCAS is composed of neurologic, myocardial, and systemic injury related to inadequate perfusion and ischemia–reperfusion injury with free radical formation and an inflammatory cascade. While targeted temperature management is the cornerstone of therapy, other intensive care unit–based management strategies include monitoring and treatment of seizures, cerebral edema, and increased intracranial pressure, as well as prevention of further neurologic injury. In this review, we discuss the scientific evidence, recent updates, future prospects, and knowledge gaps in the treatment of post–cardiac arrest patients.

Keywords

cardiac arrest - anoxic injury - post–cardiac arrest syndrome - secondary brain injury - outcomes

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Andersen LW, Holmberg MJ, Berg KM, Donnino MW, Granfeldt A. In-hospital cardiac arrest: a review. JAMA 2019; 321 (12) 1200-1210
2 Girotra S, Chan PS, Bradley SM. Post-resuscitation care following out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest. Heart 2015; 101 (24) 1943-1949
3 Greer DM. Mechanisms of injury in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: implications to therapy. Semin Neurol 2006; 26 (04) 373-379
4 Saver JL. Time is brain--quantified. Stroke 2006; 37 (01) 263-266
5 Elmer J, Callaway CW. The brain after cardiac arrest. Semin Neurol 2017; 37 (01) 19-24
6 Neumar RW. Molecular mechanisms of ischemic neuronal injury. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 36 (05) 483-506
7 Hansen FB, Secher N, Jensen MS, Østergaard L, Tønnesen E, Granfeldt A. Cortical spreading depolarizations in the postresuscitation period in a cardiac arrest male rat model. J Neurosci Res 2017; 95 (10) 2040-2050
8 Schock SC, Munyao N, Yakubchyk Y. et al. Cortical spreading depression releases ATP into the extracellular space and purinergic receptor activation contributes to the induction of ischemic tolerance. Brain Res 2007; 1168: 129-138
9 Binks A, Nolan JP. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome. Minerva Anestesiol 2010; 76 (05) 362-368
10 Kang Y. Management of post-cardiac arrest syndrome. Acute Crit Care 2019; 34 (03) 173-178
11 Neumar RW, Nolan JP, Adrie C. et al. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A consensus statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, European Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Asia, and the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa); the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; and the Stroke Council. Circulation 2008; 118 (23) 2452-2483
12 Berg KM, Soar J, Andersen LW. et al. Adult advanced life support: 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 2020; 142 (16, Suppl 1): S92-S139
13 Callaway CW, Donnino MW, Fink EL. et al. Part 8: Post-cardiac arrest care: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015; 132 (18, Suppl 2): S465-S482
14 Lascarrou JB, Merdji H, Le Gouge A. et al; CRICS-TRIGGERSEP Group. Targeted temperature management for cardiac arrest with nonshockable rhythm. N Engl J Med 2019; 381 (24) 2327-2337
15 Johnson NJ, Danielson KR, Counts CR. et al. Targeted temperature management at 33 versus 36 degrees: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care Med 2020; 48 (03) 362-369
16 Mongardon N, Dumas F, Ricome S. et al. Postcardiac arrest syndrome: from immediate resuscitation to long-term outcome. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1 (01) 45-5820
17 Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD. et al. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 2002; 346 (08) 557-563
18 Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2002; 346 (08) 549-556
19 Chandrasekaran PN, Dezfulian C, Polderman KH. What is the right temperature to cool post-cardiac arrest patients?. Crit Care 2015; 19: 406
20 Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T. et al; TTM Trial Investigators. Targeted temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (23) 2197-2206
21 Kirkegaard H, Søreide E, de Haas I. et al. Targeted temperature management for 48 vs 24 hours and neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 318 (04) 341-350
22 Callaway CW. Targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest: finding the right dose for critical care interventions. JAMA 2017; 318 (04) 334-336
23 Moskowitz A, Berg KM, Donnino MW. Targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: e109
24 Influence of cooling duration on efficacy in cardiac arrest patients - a multicenter, randomized, adaptive clinical trial to identify the optimal duration of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. November 30, 2020. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04217551
25 O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Davison AG. British Thoracic Society. BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients. Thorax 2008; 63 (Suppl. 06) vi1-vi68
26 Sinha N, Parnia S. Monitoring the brain after cardiac arrest: a new era. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2017; 17 (08) 62
27 Thal SC. Impact of NIRS-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest on resuscitation rate (NICA). Updated 2019. Accessed December 25, 2019 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03911908
28 Lemiale V, Huet O, Vigué B. et al. Changes in cerebral blood flow and oxygen extraction during post-resuscitation syndrome. Resuscitation 2008; 76 (01) 17-24
29 Böttiger BW, Krumnikl JJ, Gass P, Schmitz B, Motsch J, Martin E. The cerebral ‘no-reflow’ phenomenon after cardiac arrest in rats--influence of low-flow reperfusion. Resuscitation 1997; 34 (01) 79-87
30 Böttiger BW, Arntz HR, Chamberlain DA. et al; TROICA Trial Investigators, European Resuscitation Council Study Group. Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (25) 2651-2662
31 Targeted therapeutic mild hypercapnia after resuscitated cardiac arrest (TAME). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03114033.. 2020
32 Jakkula P, Pettilä V, Skrifvars MB. et al; COMACARE Study Group. Targeting low-normal or high-normal mean arterial pressure after cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a randomised pilot trial. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44 (12) 2091-2101
33 Buunk G, van der Hoeven JG, Meinders AE. Cerebrovascular reactivity in comatose patients resuscitated from a cardiac arrest. Stroke 1997; 28 (08) 1569-1573
34 Peberdy MA, Callaway CW, Neumar RW. et al; American Heart Association. Part 9: Post-cardiac arrest care: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010; 122 (18, Suppl 3): S768-S786
35 Roberts BW, Kilgannon JH, Hunter BR. et al. Association between early hyperoxia exposure after resuscitation from cardiac arrest and neurological disability: prospective multicenter protocol-directed cohort study. Circulation 2018; 137 (20) 2114-2124
36 Oksanen T, Skrifvars MB, Varpula T. et al. Strict versus moderate glucose control after resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33 (12) 2093-2100
37 Griesdale DE, de Souza RJ, van Dam RM. et al. Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data. CMAJ 2009; 180 (08) 821-827
38 Nolan JP, Maconochie I, Soar J. et al. Executive summary: 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 2020; 142 (16, Suppl 1): S2-S27
39 Metter RB, Rittenberger JC, Guyette FX, Callaway CW. Association between a quantitative CT scan measure of brain edema and outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2011; 82 (09) 1180-1185
40 Laver S, Farrow C, Turner D, Nolan J. Mode of death after admission to an intensive care unit following cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30 (11) 2126-2128
41 Jones S, Schwartzbauer G, Jia X. Brain monitoring in critically neurologically impaired patients. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 18 (01) 43
42 Cardim D, Griesdale DE, Ainslie PN. et al. A comparison of non-invasive versus invasive measures of intracranial pressure in hypoxic ischaemic brain injury after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2019; 137: 221-228
43 Rittenberger JC, Popescu A, Brenner RP, Guyette FX, Callaway CW. Frequency and timing of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose post-cardiac arrest subjects treated with hypothermia. Neurocrit Care 2012; 16 (01) 114-122
44 Vespa P, Martin NA, Nenov V. et al. Delayed increase in extracellular glycerol with post-traumatic electrographic epileptic activity: support for the theory that seizures induce secondary injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2002; 81: 355-357
45 Mangus DB, Huang L, Applegate PM, Gatling JW, Zhang J, Applegate II RL. A systematic review of neuroprotective strategies after cardiac arrest: from bench to bedside (Part I - Protection via specific pathways). Med Gas Res 2014; 4: 9
46 Kjaergaard J. GLP-1 analogs for neuroprotection after cardiac arrest (GLIP1). Updated 2017. Accessed December 25, 2019 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02442791
47 Hassager C. IL-6 inhibition for modulating inflammation after cardiac arrest (IMICA). Updated 2019. Accessed December 25, 2019 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03863015
48 Choi JH. Antioxidant and NMDA receptor blocker wins anoxic brain damage of KorEa OHCA patients (AWAKE). Updated 2019. Accessed December 25, 2019 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03651557
49 Geocadin RG, Wijdicks E, Armstrong MJ. et al. Practice guideline summary: Reducing brain injury following cardiopulmonary resuscitation: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2017; 88 (22) 2141-2149
50 Agarwal S, Morris N, Der-Nigoghossian C, May T, Brodie D. The influence of therapeutics on prognostication after cardiac arrest. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2019; 21 (12) 60
51 Jung C, Janssen K, Kaluza M. et al. Outcome predictors in cardiopulmonary resuscitation facilitated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Res Cardiol 2016; 105 (03) 196-205
52 Debaty G, Babaz V, Durand M. et al. Prognostic factors for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation recipients following out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrest. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2017; 112: 1-10
53 Napp LC, Kühn C, Bauersachs J. ECMO in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock. Herz 2017; 42 (01) 27-44
54 Yannopoulos D, Bartos J, Raveendran G. et al. Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 396 (10265): 1807-1816
55 Migdady I, Rice C, Deshpande A. et al. Brain injury and neurologic outcome in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2020; 48 (07) e611-e619
56 Cho SM, Ziai W, Mayasi Y. et al. Noninvasive neurological monitoring in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 2020; 66 (04) 388-393
57 Levy DE, Caronna JJ, Singer BH, Lapinski RH, Frydman H, Plum F. Predicting outcome from hypoxic-ischemic coma. JAMA 1985; 253 (10) 1420-1426
58 Wijdicks EF, Hijdra A, Young GB, Bassetti CL, Wiebe S. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2006; 67 (02) 203-210
59 Geocadin RG, Callaway CW, Fink EL. et al; American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee. Standards for studies of neurological prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019; 140 (09) e517-e542
60 Thenayan EA, Savard M, Sharpe MD, Norton L, Young B. Electroencephalogram for prognosis after cardiac arrest. J Crit Care 2010; 25 (02) 300-304
61 Endisch C, Waterstraat G, Storm C. et al. Cortical somatosensory evoked high-frequency (600Hz) oscillations predict absence of severe hypoxic encephalopathy after resuscitation. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127 (07) 2561-2569
62 Hirsch KG, Fischbein N, Mlynash M. et al. Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI for post-cardiac arrest coma. Neurology 2020; 94 (16) e1684-e1692
63 Silva S, de Pasquale F, Vuillaume C. et al. Disruption of posteromedial large-scale neural communication predicts recovery from coma. Neurology 2015; 85 (23) 2036-2044
64 Sun F, Zhou G. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (20) 1937 , author reply 1937–1938
65 Gul SS, Huesgen KW, Wang KK, Mark K, Tyndall JA. Prognostic utility of neuroinjury biomarkers in post out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient management. Med Hypotheses 2017; 105: 34-47
66 Stammet P, Collignon O, Hassager C. et al; TTM-Trial Investigators. Neuron-specific enolase as a predictor of death or poor neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management at 33°C and 36°C. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65 (19) 2104-2114
67 Vondrakova D, Kruger A, Janotka M. et al. Association of neuron-specific enolase values with outcomes in cardiac arrest survivors is dependent on the time of sample collection. Crit Care 2017; 21 (01) 172
68 Rana OR, Schröder JW, Baukloh JK. et al. Neurofilament light chain as an early and sensitive predictor of long-term neurological outcome in patients after cardiac arrest. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168 (02) 1322-1327
69 Sawyer KN, Camp-Rogers TR, Kotini-Shah P. et al; American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Stroke Council. Sudden cardiac arrest survivorship: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020; 141 (12) e654-e685
70 Perez CA, Samudra N, Aiyagari V. Cognitive and functional consequence of cardiac arrest. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2016; 16 (08) 70
71 Brierley JB, Graham DI, Adams JH, Simpsom JA. Neocortical death after cardiac arrest. A clinical, neurophysiological, and neuropathological report of two cases. Lancet 1971; 2 (7724): 560-565
72 Nunes B, Pais J, Garcia R, Magalhães Z, Granja C, Silva MC. Cardiac arrest: long-term cognitive and imaging analysis. Resuscitation 2003; 57 (03) 287-297