Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2022; 12(01): 13-17
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731116
Review Article

Gingival Biotype: A Secret for Esthetic Success

Marjita Sarma
1   Department of Periodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), NITTE (deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Nina Shenoy
1   Department of Periodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), NITTE (deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Rahul Bhandary
1   Department of Periodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), NITTE (deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Gingival biotype, in the recent years, has gained substantial interest as one of the important pillars for esthetic success. This review provides recommendations to be considered prior to performing any dental procedure to attain best clinical results. Several methods for measuring biotype have been suggested. Gingiva is often subjected to various insults during routine dental procedures. Hence, understanding the gingival biotype can provide insights into precautions rendered necessary during tissue handling to avoid undesirable treatment outcomes.

Keywords

gingival biotype - gingival thickness - TRAN


Publication History

Article published online:
14 June 2021

© 2021. Nitte (Deemed to be University). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza’s clinical periodontology. 11th edition. Elsevier Health Sciences 2011
  • 2 Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008; 36 (03) 193-198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM. et al Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45 (Suppl. 20) S219-S229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hirschfeld L. A study of skulls in the American Museum of Natural History in relation to periodontal disease. J Dent Res 1923; 5: 241-265
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1969; 13 (01) 87-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Weisgold AS. Contours of the full crown restoration. Alpha Omegan 1977; 70 (03) 77-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 1986; 13 (07) 654-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Olsson M, Lindhe J. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol 1991; 18 (01) 78-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kois JC. Altering gingival levels: The restorative connection. Part 1: biologic variables. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6 (01) 3-7
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23 (09) 839-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36 (05) 428-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30 (03) 237-243
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kois JC. Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2004; 25 (11) 895-896 , 898, 900 passim, quiz 906–907
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nagaraj KR, Savadi RC, Savadi AR. et al Gingival biotype- prosthodontic perspective. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2010; 10 (01) 27-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol 2006; 77 (08) 1410-1420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Baldi C, Pini-Prato G, Pagliaro U. et al Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19-case series. J Periodontol 1999; 70 (09) 1077-1084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Eghbali A, De Rouck T, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36 (11) 958-963
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Reddy RT, Vandana KV, Prakash S. Gingival biotype—a review. Indian Journal of Dental Advancements. 2017; 9 (02) 86-92
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Ronay V, Sahrmann P, Bindl A, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Current status and perspectives of mucogingival soft tissue measurement methods. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23 (03) 146-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol 2000; 27 (09) 621-626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bhusari BM, Chelani LR, Suthar NJ, Anjankar JP. Gingival biotypes. J Med Dent Sci Res. 2015; 2 (11) 7-10
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Pini Prato G, Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Magnani C, Cortellini P, Clauser C. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal gingival recession. J Periodontol 1992; 63 (11) 919-928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kao RT, Pasquinelli K. Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002; 30 (07) 521-526
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Reeves WG. Restorative margin placement and periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66 (06) 733-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Jung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27 (03) 251-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19 (01) 73-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sammartino G, Marenzi G, di Lauro AE, Paolantoni G. Aesthetics in oral implantology: biological, clinical, surgical, and prosthetic aspects. Implant Dent 2007; 16 (01) 54-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Denissen HW, Kalk W, Veldhuis HA. van Waas MA. Anatomic consideration for preventive implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8 (02) 191-196
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Slutzkey S, Levin L. Gingival recession in young adults: occurrence, severity, and relationship to past orthodontic treatment and oral piercing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134 (05) 652-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jin L. Periodontic-orthodontic interactions–rationale, sequence, and clinical applications. Hong Kong Dent J 2007: 60-64
  • 31 Shah R, Sowmya NK, Thomas R, Mehta DS. Periodontal biotype: basics and clinical considerations. J Interdiscip Dent. 2016; 6 (01) 44
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Grover HS, Yadav A, Yadav P. Nanda P. Optimizing gingival biotype using subepithelial connective tissue graft: a case report and one-year followup. Case Rep Dent 2011; 2011: 263813
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Shetty SS, Chatterjee A, Bose S. Bilateral multiple recession coverage with platelet-rich fibrin in comparison with amniotic membrane. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014; 18 (01) 102-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Esteves J, Bhat KM, Thomas B, Varghese JM, Jadhav T. Efficacy of human chorion membrane allograft for recession coverage: a case series. J Periodontol 2015; 86 (08) 941-944
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar