J Pediatr Intensive Care 2023; 12(01): 031-036
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730901
Original Article

Enteral Feeding for Children on Bilevel Positive Pressure Ventilation for Status Asthmaticus

Kavipriya Komeswaran
1   Department of Pediatrics, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United Sates
,
1   Department of Pediatrics, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United Sates
,
Kimberly Powell
1   Department of Pediatrics, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United Sates
,
Giovanna Caprirolo
1   Department of Pediatrics, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United Sates
,
Ryan Majcina
1   Department of Pediatrics, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United Sates
,
Randall S. Robbs
2   Center for Clinical Research, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United Sates
,
1   Department of Pediatrics, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United Sates
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

A retrospective data analysis was conducted to evaluate enteral nutrition practices for children admitted with status asthmaticus in a single-center pediatric intensive care unit. Of 406 charts, 315 were analyzed (63% male); 135 on bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation (BIPAP) and 180 on simple mask. Overall median age and weight were 6.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0) years and 24.8 (IQR: 20.8) kg, respectively. All children studied were on full feeds while still on BIPAP and simple mask; 99.3 and 100% were fed per oral, respectively. Median time to initiation of feeds and full feeds was longer in the BIPAP group, 11.0 (IQR: 20) and 23.0 hours (IQR: 26), versus simple mask group, 4.3 (IQR: 7) and 12.0 hours (IQR: 15), p = 0.001. The results remained similar after adjusting for gender, weight, clinical asthma score at admission, use of adjunct therapy, and duration of continuous albuterol. By 24 hours, 81.5% of patients on BIPAP and 96.6% on simple mask were started on feeds. Compared with simple mask, patients on BIPAP were sicker with median asthma score at admission of 4 (IQR: 2) versus 3 (IQR: 2) on simple mask, requiring more adjunct therapy (80.0 vs. 43.9%), and a longer median length of therapy of 41.0 (IQR: 41) versus 20.0 hours (IQR: 29), respectively, p = 0.001. There were no complications such as aspiration pneumonia, and none required invasive mechanical ventilation in either group. Enteral nutrition was effectively and safely initiated and continued for children admitted with status asthmaticus, including those on noninvasive bilevel ventilation therapy.

Note

This work was performed at St. John’s Children’s Hospital, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine in Springfield, IL.




Publication History

Received: 14 January 2021

Accepted: 25 March 2021

Article published online:
08 June 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany