CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2021; 13(02): 144-147
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730821
Original Article

Effect of Hypoproteinemia on Electrolyte Measurement by Direct and Indirect Ion Selective Electrode Methods

Mukesh Gohel
1   Department of Biochemistry, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
,
Jemil S. Makadia
1   Department of Biochemistry, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
,
Chandan Chakrabarti
1   Department of Biochemistry, Smt NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to see the effect of hypoproteinemia on electrolyte measurement by two different techniques, that is, direct ion selective electrode (ISE) and indirect ISE.

Material and Method It was an observational study in which 90 serum samples with normal protein content (Group-1) were subjected to sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) measurements by direct and indirect ISE methods. In the same way, 90 serum samples with total protein < 5 g/dL (Group-2) were subjected to Na+ and K+ measurements by direct and indirect ISE methods.

Result In samples from Group-1 patients, average Na+ was 138.1 ± 4.764 mmol/L by direct ISE method and 139.3 ± 3.887 mmol/L by indirect ISE method while average K+ was 4.41 ± 0.644 mmol/L by direct ISE method and 4.40 ± 0.592 mmol/L by indirect ISE method. There was no statistically significant difference in Na+ and K+ values measured by different methods. In samples from Group-2 patients, measured value of Na+ by direct ISE and indirect ISE was 134.57 ± 5.520 mmol/L and 138.64 ± 5.401 mmol/L, respectively. Difference between these two values was statistically significant with p-value of < 0.0001, but direct ISE and indirect ISE measured values of K+ was 4.146 ± 0.9639 mmol/L and 4.186 ± 0.8989, respectively, with no significant difference.

Conclusion Direct and indirect ISE methods are not comparable and showing significantly different results for Na+ in case of hypoproteinemia. So, it is recommended that setups like intensive care unit or emergency department, where electrolyte values have significant treatment outcome, should follow direct ISE method and should compare its previous result with the same method. Both the methods should not be used interchangeably.



Publication History

Article published online:
19 June 2021

© 2021. The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Holbek CC. Understanding the different values in electrolyte measurements. October 2002. Available at: https://acutecaretesting.org/en/articles/understanding-the-different-values-in-electrolyte-measurements. Accessed April 15, 2020
  • 2 Ladenson JH, Apple FS, Aguanno JJ, Koch DD. Sodium measurements in multiple myeloma: two techniques compared. Clin Chem 1982; 28 (12) 2383-2386
  • 3 Madhavi. Nikhila G. Arterial blood gas analyser electrolytes versus serum electrolytes: a comparative study. Int J Life Sci Pharma Res 2018; 8: 37-51
  • 4 Jain A, Subhan I, Joshi M. Comparison of the point-of-care blood gas analyzer versus the laboratory auto-analyzer for the measurement of electrolytes. Int J Emerg Med 2009; 2 (02) 117-120
  • 5 Datta SK. When direct and indirect ion selective electrode results conflict. AACC, Sept 1, 2018. Available at: https://www.aacc.org/publications/cln/articles/2018/september/when-direct-and-indirect-ion-selective-electrode-results-conflict. Accessed April 15, 2020
  • 6 Liamis G, Liberopoulos E, Barkas F, Elisaf M. Spurious electrolyte disorders: a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Am J Nephrol 2013; 38 (01) 50-57
  • 7 Igbokwe AA. Comparison of point of care testing (POCT) methods and central laboratory methods for key electrolytes. Newspath, CAP Point of Care Testing Committee. Available at: https://webapps.cap.org/apps/docs/newspath/0711/key_electrolytes.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2020
  • 8 Zelmat MS. [Direct and indirect ion selective electrodes methods: the differences specified through a case of Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2015; 73 (03) 345-352
  • 9 Jones BJ, Twomey PJ. Relationship of the absolute difference between direct and indirect ion selective electrode measurement of serum sodium and the total protein concentration. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61 (05) 645-647
  • 10 Fortgens P, Pillay TS. Pseudohyponatremia revisited: a modern-day pitfall. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011; 135 (04) 516-519
  • 11 Dimeski G, Morgan TJ, Presneill JJ, Venkatesh B. Disagreement between ion selective electrode direct and indirect sodium measurements: estimation of the problem in a tertiary referral hospital. J Crit Care 2012; 27 (03) 326.e9-326.e16
  • 12 Callewaert N, Martens F, Muys M. Pseudohypernatremia at the intensive care unit: a cause for concern? Conference: BVKB-SBCC, At Brussels, October 2013. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281405506_Pseudohypernatremia_at_the_intensive_care_unit_a_cause_for_concern. Accessed April 15, 2020
  • 13 Higgins C. Spurious sodium results (1) – Pseudohyponatremia. March 2015. Available at: https://acutecaretesting.org/en/articles/spurious-sodium-results-1-pseudohyponatremia. Accessed April 15, 2020
  • 14 Higgins C. Spurious sodium results (2) – Pseudohyponatremia. June 2015. Available at: https://acutecaretesting.org/en/articles/spurious-sodium-results2-pseudohypernatremia. Accessed April 15, 2020
  • 15 Chow E, Fox N, Gama R. Effect of low serum total protein on sodium and potassium measurement by ion-selective electrodes in critically ill patients. Br J Biomed Sci 2008; 65 (03) 128-131