PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Coloproctology 2021; 41(02): 117-123
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730013
Original Article|Artigo Original

Effects of Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal on Short-term Operative Outcomes Among Vietnamese Patients

Resultados da reversão precoce da cirurgia de Hartmann em pacientes vietnamitas
Viet Van Ung 
1   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
,
Bang Cong Huynh 
2   University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
,
Vinh Chi Le 
3   Faculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
,
Dang Ngoc Tran 
3   Faculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
,
Trung Nguyen Vo 
4   Faculty of Nursing, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
,
Tan Van Pham 
2   University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
,
Bac Hoang Nguyen 
2   University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background The reestablishment of continuity after Hartmann operation is considered a major surgical procedure with high morbidity and mortality. The optimal interval time between the Hartman procedure and reversal is controversial. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic Hartmann reversal and to determine the optimal timing of operation.

Methods All patients who underwent laparoscopic Hartmann reversal from 2008 to 2019 (11 years) at the University Medical Center (UMC) in Ho Chi Minh City were recruited and divided into 2 groups according to the interval time (≤ 4 or > 4 months). The short-term operative outcomes of these groups were compared.

Results There were 66 patients who underwent laparoscopic Hartmann reversal (mean age: 63.2 years old); ∼ 77% of them had colorectal cancer, and 17% had complicated diverticular disease. The mortality rate, anastomotic leakage rate, and overall complication rate were 0%, 1.5%, and 13.2%, respectively. Early operation was performed in 36 patients, and late reversal in 28 patients. There was no difference in mortality, anastomotic leakage, operative complications, and hospital stay between the two groups.

Conclusion Laparoscopic Hartmann reversal was effective with acceptable morbidity and mortality at the UMC. There was no observed impact of the interval time between the Hartmann procedure and laparoscopic Hartmann reversal on the short-term operative outcomes.

Resumo

Introdução O reestabelecimento da continuidade após a cirurgia de Hartmann é considerado um procedimento cirúrgico de grande porte com altas morbidade e mortalidade. O tempo ideal de intervalo entre a cirurgia de Hartmann e a reversão é controverso. Nosso estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia da reversão da cirurgia de Hartmann e determinar o momento ideal para a cirurgia.

Métodos Todos os pacientes submetidos à reversão laparoscópica da cirurgia de Hartmann entre 2008 e 2019 (11 anos) no Centro Médico Universitário (UMC, na sigla em inglês) na cidade de Ho Chi Minh foram recrutados e divididos em 2 grupos de acordo com o tempo de intervalo (≤ 4 ou > 4 meses). Os resultados pós-operatórios de curto prazo destes grupos foram comparados.

Resultados Um total de 66 pacientes foram submetidos à reversão laparoscópica da cirurgia de Hartmann (mediana de idade: 63.2 anos); ∼ 77 deles tinha câncer colorretal, e 17% tinham doença diverticular complicada. As taxas de mortalidade, de vazamento, e de complicações em geral foram de 0%, 1,5%, e 13,2%, respectivamente. Cirurgia precoce foi realizada em 36 pacientes, e reversão tardia foi realizada em 28 pacientes. Não houve diferença em mortalidade, vazamento anastomótico, complicações operatórias e duração da internação entre os dois grupos.

Conclusão A reversão laparoscópica da cirurgia de Hartmann foi eficaz, com morbidade e mortalidade aceitáveis no UMC. Não foi observado qualquer impacto no tempo de intervalo entre a cirurgia de Hartmann e a reversão laparoscópica nos resultados pós-operatórios de curto prazo.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal - effectiveness - interval time - Vietnamese patients

Palavras-chave

reversão laparoscópica da cirurgia de Hartmann - eficácia - tempo de intervalo - pacientes vietnamitas

Credit Author Statement

Bac N. H.: Conceptualization, writing- reviewing and editing. Viet U. V.: Methodology, data curation, data analysis, writing; preparation of the original draft. Tan P. V.: Data analysis, writing- reviewing and editing. Bang H. C.: Data analysis, writing- reviewing and editing. Trung V. N: Writing-reviewing and editing. Dang T. N.: Data analysis, writing-reviewing and editing. Vinh L. C.: Writing-reviewing and editing.


Funding

The present research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 09. Juni 2020

Angenommen: 15. Januar 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. Juni 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • References

  • 1 van Gulik TM, Mallonga ET, Taat CW. Henri Hartmann, lord of the Hôtel-Dieu. Neth J Surg 1986; 38 (02) 45-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Park J-M, Chi KC. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure. J Korean Surg Soc 2012; 82 (04) 256-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Swank HA, Vermeulen J, Lange JF. et al; Dutch Diverticular Disease (3D) Collaborative Study Group. The ladies trial: laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or resection for purulent peritonitis and Hartmann's procedure or resection with primary anastomosis for purulent or faecal peritonitis in perforated diverticulitis (NTR2037). BMC Surg 2010; 10: 29 . This article is open access. https://bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2482-10-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Oberkofler CE, Rickenbacher A, Raptis DA. et al. A multicenter randomized clinical trial of primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (05) 819-826 , discussion 826–827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 De'angelis N, Brunetti F, Memeo R. et al. Comparison between open and laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 5 (08) 245-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Roque-Castellano C, Marchena-Gomez J, Hemmersbach-Miller M. et al. Analysis of the factors related to the decision of restoring intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22 (09) 1091-1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mazeh H, Greenstein AJ, Swedish K. et al. Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann's procedure--a comparative retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 2009; 23 (03) 496-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2006; 93 (08) 921-928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J. Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 2008; 143 (08) 762-767 , discussion 768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gorey TF, O'Connell PR, Waldron D, Cronin K, Kerin M, Fitzpatrick JM. Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Br J Surg 1993; 80 (01) 109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lucarini L, Galleano R, Lombezzi R, Ippoliti M, Ajraldi G. Laparoscopic-assisted Hartmann's reversal with the Dexterity Pneumo Sleeve. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (08) 1164-1167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Keck JO, Collopy BT, Ryan PJ, Fink R, Mackay JR, Woods RJ. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: effect of timing and technique on ease and safety. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37 (03) 243-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ. Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Br J Surg 1992; 79 (08) 839-841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Figueiredo MN, Mège D, Maggiori L, Ferron M, Panis Y. When is the best time for temporary stoma closure in laparoscopic sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer? A study of 259 consecutive patients. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19 (08) 469-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Roe AM, Prabhu S, Ali A, Brown C, Brodribb AJ. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: timing and operative technique. Br J Surg 1991; 78 (10) 1167-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Geoghegan JG, Rosenberg IL. Experience with early anastomosis after the Hartmann procedure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1991; 73 (02) 80-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lucchetta A, De Manzini N. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure: is it safe and feasible?. Updates Surg 2016; 68 (01) 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Celentano V, Giglio MC. Case Selection for Laparoscopic Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28 (01) 13-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pei KY, Davis KA, Zhang Y. Assessing trends in laparoscopic colostomy reversal and evaluating outcomes when compared to open procedures. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (02) 695-701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gavrila D, Minciuna CE, Tudor S, Lacatus M, Vasilescu C. Laparoscopic Hartmann s Reversal: A Single Center Experience. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2019; 114 (02) 284-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Giuseppe R, Id FN. Serafino M. et al. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure: A single-center experience. Asian J Endosc Surg 2019; 12 (04) 486-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kwak HD, Kim J, Kang DW, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Kim SH. Hartmann's reversal: a comparative study between laparoscopic and open approaches. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88 (05) 450-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Park W, Park WC, Kim KY, Lee SY. Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Hartmann Colostomy Reversal. Ann Coloproctol 2018; 34 (06) 306-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Joong-Min Park, Kyong-Choun Chi. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Korean Surg 2012; 82 (04) 256-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rosen MJ, Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure. Am J Surg 2005; 189 (06) 670-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fiscon V, Portale G, Mazzeo A, Migliorini G, Frigo F. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Updates Surg 2014; 66 (04) 277-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 J, L. Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after hartmann procedure. 2001
    PubMed
  • 28 Huynh H, Trottier DC, Soto CM. et al. Laparoscopic colostomy reversal after a Hartmann procedure: a prospective series, literature review and an argument against laparotomy as the primary approach. Can J Surg 2011; 54 (02) 133-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Fleming FJ, Gillen P. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure following acute diverticulitis: is timing everything?. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24 (10) 1219-1225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Tan WS, Lim JF, Tang CL, Eu KW. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: experience in an Asian population. Singapore Med J 2012; 53 (01) 46-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Markus Zimmermann, Martin Hoffmann, Tilman Laubert, Karl-Frederik Meyer, Thomas Jungbluth, Uwe-Johannes Roblick, Hans-Peter Bruch, Erik Schlöricke. Laparoscopic Versus Open Reversal of a Hartmann Procedure: A Single-Center Study. World Journal of Surgery 2014; 38: 2145-2152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar