Elbow Imaging: Variants and Asymptomatic Findings

Neha Antil; Kathryn J. Stevens; Amelie M. Lutz

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1729960

Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2021; 25(04): 546-557
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729960

Review Article

Elbow Imaging: Variants and Asymptomatic Findings

Authors

Neha Antil

¹Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Kathryn J. Stevens

¹Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Amelie M. Lutz

¹Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California

Abstract

One of the key principles in the interpretation of radiology images is the ability to differentiate between normal and abnormal findings. This article provides a comprehensive overview of normal structures and anatomical variants occurring around the elbow including potential diagnostic pitfalls. We discuss frequently observed anatomical variants found in routine clinical practice associated with osseous, ligamentous, musculotendinous, and neurovascular structures at the elbow that may simulate pathology or predispose to symptoms under specific circumstances.

Keywords

elbow - normal - anatomical variants - pitfalls

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Tomsick SD, Petersen BD. Normal anatomy and anatomical variants of the elbow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010; 14 (04) 379-393
2 Stein JM, Cook TS, Simonson S, Kim W. Normal and variant anatomy of the elbow on magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2011; 19 (03) 609-619
3 Freyschmidt J, Brossmann J. “Freyschmidt's Koehler/Zimmer” Borderlands of Normal and Early Pathologic Findings in Skeletal Radiography. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2003
4 Rosenberg ZS, Bencardino J, Beltran J. MR imaging of normal variants and interpretation pitfalls of the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1997; 5 (03) 481-499
5 Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Cheung Y, Broker M. MR imaging of the elbow: normal variant and potential diagnostic pitfalls of the trochlear groove and cubital tunnel. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164 (02) 415-418
6 Singhal S, Rao V. Supratrochlear foramen of the humerus. Anat Sci Int 2007; 82 (02) 105-107
7 Erdogmus S, Guler M, Eroglu S, Duran N. The importance of the supratrochlear foramen of the humerus in humans: an anatomical study. Med Sci Monit 2014; 20: 2643-2650
8 Hirsch IS. On a foramen in the lower extremity of the humerus. Radiology 1928; 10 (03) 199-208
9 Nayak SR, Das S, Krishnamurthy A, Prabhu LV, Potu BK. Supratrochlear foramen of the humerus: an anatomico-radiological study with clinical implications. Ups J Med Sci 2009; 114 (02) 90-94
10 Mittal R, Sampath Kumar V, Gupta T. Patella cubiti: a case report and literature review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014; 134 (04) 467-471
11 Khomarwut K, Sutthisast W, Vasuntaraporn U, Arpornchayanon O. Bilateral patellar CUBITI: a case report. Bangk Med J 2019; 15 (01) 91-93
12 Pavlov H, Torg JS, Jacobs B, Vigorita V. Nonunion of olecranon epiphysis: two cases in adolescent baseball pitchers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 136 (04) 819-820
13 Obermann WR, Loose HW. The os supratrochleare dorsale: a normal variant that may cause symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 141 (01) 123-127
14 Shon HC, Park JK, Kim DS, Kang SW, Kim KJ, Hong SH. Supracondylar process syndrome: two cases of median nerve neuropathy due to compression by the ligament of Struthers. J Pain Res 2018; 11: 803-807
15 Grayson DE. The elbow: radiographic imaging pearls and pitfalls. Semin Roentgenol 2005; 40 (03) 223-247
16 Newman A. The supracondylar process and its fracture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1969; 105 (04) 844-849
17 Pećina M, Borić I, Anticević D. Intraoperatively proven anomalous Struthers' ligament diagnosed by MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2002; 31 (09) 532-535
18 Cucca YY, McLay SV, Okamoto T, Ecker J, McMenamin PG. The biceps brachii muscle and its distal insertion: observations of surgical and evolutionary relevance. Surg Radiol Anat 2010; 32 (04) 371-375
19 Lee SE, Jung C, Ahn KY, Nam KI. Bilateral asymmetric supernumerary heads of biceps brachii. Anat Cell Biol 2011; 44 (03) 238-240
20 Tagliafico AS, Bignotti B, Martinoli C. Elbow US: anatomy, variants, and scanning technique. Radiology 2015; 275 (03) 636-650
21 Konin GP, Nazarian LN, Walz DM. US of the elbow: indications, technique, normal anatomy, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics 2013; 33 (04) E125-E147
22 De Maeseneer M, Brigido MK, Antic M. et al. Ultrasound of the elbow with emphasis on detailed assessment of ligaments, tendons, and nerves. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84 (04) 671-681
23 Dirim B, Brouha SS, Pretterklieber ML. et al. Terminal bifurcation of the biceps brachii muscle and tendon: anatomic considerations and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191 (06) W248-W255
24 Mugalur A, Shahane SM, Samant A, Pathak AC, Patil A, Reddy R. Anatomic variation of palmaris longus and flexor digitorum superficialis of little finger in Indian population. SICOT J 2015; 1: 5
25 Olewnik Ł, Wysiadecki G, Polguj M, Podgórski M, Jezierski H, Topol M. Anatomical variations of the palmaris longus muscle including its relation to the median nerve—a proposal for a new classification. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18 (01) 539
26 Husarik DB, Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, Jost B, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Elbow nerves: MR findings in 60 asymptomatic subjects—normal anatomy, variants, and pitfalls. Radiology 2009; 252 (01) 148-156
27 Kojima T, Kurihara K, Nagano T. A study on operative findings and pathogenic factors in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Handchirurgie 1979; 11 (02) 99-104
28 Sookur PA, Naraghi AM, Bleakney RR, Jalan R, Chan O, White LM. Accessory muscles: anatomy, symptoms, and radiologic evaluation. Radiographics 2008; 28 (02) 481-499
29 Miller TT, Reinus WR. Nerve entrapment syndromes of the elbow, forearm, and wrist. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195 (03) 585-594
30 Oh CS, Chung IH, Koh KS. Anatomical study of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus and the anterior interosseous nerve in Asians. Clin Anat 2000; 13 (06) 434-438
31 al-Qattan MM. Gantzer's muscle. An anatomical study of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus muscle. J Hand Surg [Br] 1996; 21 (02) 269-270
32 Caetano EB, Sabongi JJ, Vieira LÂ, Caetano MF, Moraes DV. Gantzer muscle. An anatomical study. Acta Ortop Bras 2015; 23 (02) 72-75
33 Chakravarthi KK. Gantzer's muscle an accessory muscle of forearm—its anatomical variations and clinical insight. International Journal of Chemical and Lifesciences. 2019; 2 (07) 1199-1203
34 Loukas M, Louis Jr RG, South G, Alsheik E, Christopherson C. A case of an accessory brachialis muscle. Clin Anat 2006; 19 (06) 550-553
35 Akhtar MJ, Fatima N. An accessory brachialis muscle associated with abnormal arrangement of structures in the cubital fossa: a case report. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2015; 3 (12) 3907-3910
36 Pai MM, Nayak SR, Vadgaonkar R. et al. Accessory brachialis muscle: a case report. Morphologie 2008; 92 (296) 47-49
37 Stevens KJ, McNally EG. Magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow in athletes. Clin Sports Med 2010; 29 (04) 521-553
38 Munshi M, Pretterklieber ML, Chung CB. et al. Anterior bundle of ulnar collateral ligament: evaluation of anatomic relationships by using MR imaging, MR arthrography, and gross anatomic and histologic analysis. Radiology 2004; 231 (03) 797-803
39 Acosta Batlle J, Cerezal L, López Parra MD, Alba B, Resano S, Blázquez Sánchez J. The elbow: review of anatomy and common collateral ligament complex pathology using MRI. Insights Imaging 2019; 10 (01) 43
40 Alcid JG, Ahmad CS, Lee TQ. Elbow anatomy and structural biomechanics. Clin Sports Med 2004; 23 (04) 503-517 , vii
41 Fowler KA, Chung CB. Normal MR imaging anatomy of the elbow. Radiol Clin North Am 2006; 44 (04) 553-567 , viii
42 Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Gandolfo N, Valle M, Simonetti S, Derchi LE. US of nerve entrapments in osteofibrous tunnels of the upper and lower limbs. Radiographics 2000;20(Spec No):S199–S213; discussion S213–S217
43 Bäumer P, Dombert T, Staub F. et al. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: MR neurography—nerve T2 signal increase and caliber. Radiology 2011; 260 (01) 199-206
44 Glover NM, Murphy PB. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Radial Nerve. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls; 2020
45 Jamadar DA, Robertson BL, Jacobson JA. et al. Musculoskeletal sonography: important imaging pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (01) 216-225
46 Xiao TG, Cartwright MS. Ultrasound in the evaluation of radial neuropathies at the elbow. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 216
47 Hagert CG, Lundborg G, Hansen T. Entrapment of the posterior interosseous nerve. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 11 (03) 205-212