Evaluation of the Reliability and Reproducibility of the Roussouly Classification for Lumbar Lordosis Types

Abstract

Objective The present study aims to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability and reproducibility of the Roussouly classification for lumbar lordosis types.

Methods A database of 104 panoramic, lateral radiographs of the spine of male individuals aged between 18 and 40 years old was used. Six examiners with different expertise levels measured spinopelvic angles and classified lordosis types according to the Roussouly classification using the Surgimap software (Nemaris Inc., New York, NY, USA). After a 1-month interval, the measurements were repeated, and the intra- and inter-rater agreement were calculated using the Fleiss Kappa test.

Results The study revealed positive evidence regarding the reproducibility of the Roussouly classification, with reasonable to virtually perfect (0.307–0.827) intra-rater agreement, and moderate (0.43) to reasonable (0.369) inter-rater agreement according to the Fleiss kappa test. The most experienced examiners showed greater inter-rater agreement, ranging from substantial (0.619) to moderate (0.439).

Conclusion The Roussouly classification demonstrated good reliability and reproducibility, with intra- and inter-rater agreements at least reasonable, and reaching substantial to virtually perfect levels in some situations. Evaluators with highest expertise levels showed greater intra and inter-rater agreement.

Keywords

spinal curvatures - postural balance - lordosis/classification

Financial Support

There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.

Publication History

Received: 28 September 2020

Accepted: 01 December 2020

Article published online:
13 December 2021

• Referências

• 1 Hu P, Yu M, Sun Z. et al. Analysis of global sagittal postural patterns in asymptomatic Chinese adults. Asian Spine J 2016; 10 (02) 282-288
• 2 Bassani T, Galbusera F, Luca A, Lovi A, Gallazzi E, Brayda-Bruno M. Physiological variations in the sagittal spine alignment in an asymptomatic elderly population. Spine J 2019; 19 (11) 1840-1849
• 3 Bae J, Lee SH, Shin SH, Seo JS, Kim KH, Jang JS. Radiological analysis of upper lumbar disc herniation and spinopelvic sagittal alignment. Eur Spine J 2016; 25 (05) 1382-1388
• 4 Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH. The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems. Spine 2006; 31 (19, Suppl): S119-S125
• 5 Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy JP, Pagala M. Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 2002; 27 (04) 387-392
• 6 Menezes-Reis R, Bonugli GP, Dalto VF, da Silva Herrero CF, Defino HL, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Association between lumbar spine sagittal alignment and L4-L5 disc degeneration among asymptomatic young adults. Spine 2016; 41 (18) E1081-E1087
• 7 Mardare M, Oprea M, Popa I, Zazgyva A, Niculescu M, Poenaru DV. Sagittal balance parameters correlate with spinal conformational type and MRI changes in lumbar degenerative disc disease: results of a retrospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2016; 26 (07) 735-743
• 8 Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, O'Brien M. The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5-s1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine 2005; 30 (06, Suppl): S27-S34
• 9 Chaléat-Valayer E, Mac-Thiong J, Paquet J. et al. Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 Suppl 5 (Suppl. 05) 634-640
• 10 Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S. et al. International Spine Study Group (ISSG). Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine 2013; 38 (13) E803-E812
• 11 Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC. et al. Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 Suppl 6 (Suppl. 06) S834-841
• 12 Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 2019; 28 (09) 1889-1905
• 13 Le Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S. Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (01) 87-95
• 14 Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 2005; 30 (03) 346-353
• 15 Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. [Geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: proposed classification]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 2003; 89 (07) 632-639
• 16 Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed.. New York: Wiley; 1981
• 17 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
• 18 R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2015. . Disponível em: < http://www.Rproject.org
• 19 Lafage R, Ferrero E, Henry JK. et al. Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters. Spine J 2015; 15 (12) 2493-2502