CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2021; 31(01): 172-184
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729487
Pictorial Essay

Uncommon Iatrogenic Devices Seen on Chest Radiographs

Vimal Raj
1   Cardiothoracic Imaging Unit, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Santhosh Kumar DG
1   Cardiothoracic Imaging Unit, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Richard A. Tobias
1   Cardiothoracic Imaging Unit, Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Chest radiograph (CXR) is the most common imaging performed for both inpatients and outpatients. With advances in medicine and technology, newer devices/prosthesis are being used in the treatment of cardiothoracic conditions. Some of these are common while others are seen only in a handful of cases, especially in patients being treated or referred from tertiary care centers. It is important to know about these devices, their functionality, and radiographic appearances. Many of these devices also help us in understanding the clinical condition of the patient, as some are only used in unstable patients. Newer methods of life support are now available in intensive care units and these also can be seen on CXRs. In this review, we present various iatrogenic devices that we come across on a CXR and highlight important features to determine their correct placement and potential complications. The review looks at cardiac temporary and permanent pacing devices, cardiac interventional devices used to treat congenital heart disease, newer cardiac monitoring devices, and unusual surgical devices that one may come across on a CXR. We also suggest a stepwise algorithm to assess these devices on a CXR.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. Mai 2021

© 2021. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Edwards NC, Varma M, Pitcher DW. Routine chest radiography after permanent pacemaker implantation: is it necessary?. J Postgrad Med 2005; 51 (02) 92-96, discussion 96–97
  • 2 Costelloe CM, Murphy WA Jr, Gladish GW, Rozner MA. Radiography of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (06) 1252-1258
  • 3 Hertzberg BS, Chiles C, Ravin CE. Right atrial appendage pacing: radiographic considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 145 (01) 31-33
  • 4 Lee EY, Siegel MJ, Chu CM, Gutierrez FR, Kort HW. Amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder for pediatric patients: radiographic appearance. Radiology 2004; 233 (02) 471-476
  • 5 Belott P, Reynolds D. Permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter- defibrillator implantation in adults. In: Ellenbogen K, Kay GN, Auricchio A, et al.,eds. Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy. 5th edition.. Philadelphia: Elsevier 2017; 631-691
  • 6 Sovari AA, Zarghamravanbakhsh P, Shehata M. Temporary cardiac pacing. In: Brown DL, ed. Cardiac Intensive Care. 3rd edition.. Philadelphia: Elsevier 2019; 456-460
  • 7 Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS, Tsau PH, Berger WG, Standen JR. Medical devices of the chest. Radiographics 2004; 24 (06) 1725-1746
  • 8 Gammage MD. Temporary cardiac pacing. Heart 2000; 83 (06) 715-720
  • 9 Foot CL, Coucher J, Stickley M, Mundy J, Venkatesh B. The imaginary line method is not reliable for identification of prosthetic heart valves on AP chest radiographs. Crit Care Resusc 2006; 8 (01) 15-18
  • 10 Saxena P, Bhan A, Sharma RK, Mehta Y. Which valve is which?. Ann Card Anaesth 2015; 18 (04) 587-588
  • 11 Khan TM, Siddiqui AH. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP). Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls 2020
  • 12 Turner DR, Gaines PA. Endovascular management of coarctation of the aorta. Semin Intervent Radiol 2007; 24 (02) 153-166
  • 13 Mercieca V, Grech V, Degiovanni J. Use of stents for correction of pulmonary artery branch stenosis. Images Paediatr Cardiol 2004; 6 (03) 1-10
  • 14 Sopko DR, Smith TP. Bronchial artery embolization for hemoptysis. Semin Intervent Radiol 2011; 28 (01) 48-62
  • 15 Johnson WR, Fedor D, Singhal S. Systematic review of surgical treatment techniques for adult and pediatric patients with pectus excavatum. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9: 25
  • 16 Tocchioni F, Ghionzoli M, Messineo A, Romagnoli P. Pectus excavatum and heritable disorders of the connective tissue. Pediatr Rep 2013; 5 (03) e15
  • 17 Tahmassebi R, Ashrafian H, Salih C, Deshpande RP, Athanasiou T, Dussek JE. Intra-abdominal pectus bar migration–a rare clinical entity: case report. J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 3: 39
  • 18 Nouh MR. Spinal fusion-hardware construct: basic concepts and imaging review. World J Radiol 2012; 4 (05) 193-207
  • 19 Longo UG, Petrillo S, Loppini M. et al. Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20 (01) 477
  • 20 Shah AT, Jankharia BB. Imaging of common breast implants and implant-related complications: a pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26 (02) 216-225
  • 21 Squiers JJ, Lima B, DiMaio JM. Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in adults: fundamental principles and systematic review of the evidence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152 (01) 20-32