CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2021; 13(02): 169-174
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729473
Original Article

Quality Indicators for Evaluating Errors in the Preanalytical Phase

Mohit Mehndiratta
1   Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Eram Hussain Pasha
1   Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Nilesh Chandra
2   Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Diagnostic Centre, Delhi, India
,
Edelbert Anthonio Almeida
1   Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to study the incidence of preanalytical errors in the clinical chemistry laboratory attached to a tertiary care hospital.

Design and Methods The study was conducted in a clinical chemistry laboratory using the samples and forms received for analysis. Five hundred random samples were analyzed using a predefined set of quality indicators (QIs) over a period of 3 months. The incidence of each preanalytical error was described as a percentage of the total samples analyzed in the study.

Statistical Analysis Individual QIs were assigned values as 0 and 1 and were used to assess each sample; 0 if the error was present, and 1 if absent. The incidence of each preanalytical error was described as a percentage of the total samples analyzed in the study.

Result Out of the 500 samples observed, 138 samples were error free, while 21 samples had the maximum number of errors, that is, 6. The error committed most often was the omission of provisional diagnosis being mentioned on the requisition form. No preanalytical error was observed for QIs: selecting the appropriate blood collection vial or storage of sample.

Conclusion This study confirms that error rate in the preanalytical phase is high and vastly ignored. Errors committed here may be overlooked, given the large number of samples received in the clinical laboratory of a tertiary center. To reduce these errors, the laboratory should provide training to all workers involved in the preanalytical phase. Daily or weekly QI scores should be recorded to assess and rectify shortcomings, thereby improving patient care.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
26 May 2021

© 2021. The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 2016; 353: i2139
  • 2 Baron JM, Mermel CH, Lewandrwski KB, Dighe AS. Detection of preanalytical laboratory testing errors using statistically guided protocol. Am J Clin Pathol 2012; 138 (03) 406-413
  • 3 Lundberg GD. Acting on significant laboratory results. JAMA 1981; 245 (17) 1762-1763
  • 4 Cornes MP, Atherton J, Pourmahram G. et al. Monitoring and reporting of preanalytical errors in laboratory medicine: the UK situation. Ann Clin Biochem 2016; 53 (02) 279-284
  • 5 Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S. et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (07) 1113-1126
  • 6 Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44 (06) 750-759
  • 7 Lippi G, Guidi GC, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44 (04) 358-365
  • 8 Laposata M, Dighe A. “Pre-pre” and “post-post” analytical error: high-incidence patient safety hazards involving the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007; 45 (06) 712-719
  • 9 Institute of Medicine Committee to Design a Strategy for Quality Review and Assurance in Medicare. Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance. Washington, DC: National Academies Press 1990
  • 10 Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press 2000
  • 11 Plebani M. Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing. Clin Biochem Rev 2012; 33 (03) 85-88
  • 12 Bhavsar M, Javia H, Chinawale C, Bhimani N, Shah R. Pre-analytical errors in clinical chemistry laboratory of a tertiary care hospital. Int J Sci Res (Ahmedabad) 2018; 7 (04) 27-29
  • 13 Wiwanitkit V. Types and frequency of preanalytical mistakes in the first Thai ISO 9002:1994 certified clinical laboratory, a 6 - month monitoring. BMC Clin Pathol 2001; 1 (01) 5
  • 14 Sushma BJ, Shrikant C. Study on “Pre-analytical Errors in a Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory”: The Hidden Flaws in Total Testing. Biochem Anal Biochem 2019; 8: 374
  • 15 Chawla R, Goswami V, Tayal D, Mallika V. Identification of the types of preanalytical errors in the clinical chemistry laboratory: 1-year study of GB Pant Hospital. Lab Med 2010; 41: 89-92
  • 16 Najat D. Prevalence of pre-analytical errors in clinical chemistry diagnostic labs in Sulaimani City of Iraqi Kurdistan. PLoS One 2017; 12 (01) e0170211
  • 17 Calmarza P, Cordero J. Lipemia interferences in routine clinical biochemical tests. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2011; 21 (02) 160-166