CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2021; 13(02): 118-122
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729141
Original Article

Fosfomycin versus Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Lower UTI in Outpatients

Shraddha Sharma
1   Department of Microbiology, Govt. Medical College, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
,
Pankaj Kumar Verma
2   Department of Surgery, Govt. Medical College, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
,
Vinita Rawat
1   Department of Microbiology, Govt. Medical College, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
,
Umesh Varshney
1   Department of Microbiology, Govt. Medical College, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
,
Rajesh Kumar Singh
3   Department of Community Medicine, Govt. Medical College, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction Fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin are increasingly being prescribed in outpatients for the oral treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI). Although ample literature is available on the in vitro sensitivity pattern of fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin in UTI cases, clinical data are scant.

Methodology Voided midstream urine, collected from patients ≥ 16 years of age of both genders with suspected sign and symptoms, was plated on cystine lactose electrolyte-deficient agar. Uropathogen was defined as an organism known to be associated with the signs and symptoms of UTI with > 105 colony forming units/mL of urine. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was determined by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Further, for fosfomycin, agar dilution method was also performed.

Results A total of 143 patients, 47 treated with fosfomycin and 96 with nitrofurantoin, were followed for clinical outcome. The most common isolated uropathogen was Escherichia coli. In vitro susceptibility rate of uropathogens against fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin was 99.3% and 81.2%, respectively. Overall, the clinical cure rate with fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin treatment groups was 80.85% and 90.06% respectively (not statistically significant).

Conclusion Fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin showed good in vitro activity against uropathogens from lower UTI and can be used for empirical therapy in our area. Multiple confounding factors may have contributed to the discrepancy between in vitro susceptibility and clinical cure, which needs to be studied further.



Publication History

Article published online:
30 May 2021

© 2021. The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Banerjee S, Sengupta M, Sarker TK. Fosfomycin susceptibility among multidrug-resistant, extended-spectrum -lactamase-producing, carbapenem-resistant uropathogens. Indian J Urol 2017; 33 (02) 149-154
  • 2 Sastry S, Doi Y. Fosfomycin: resurgence of an old companion. J Infect Chemother 2016; 22 (05) 273-280
  • 3 Patwardhan V, Singh S. Fosfomycin for the treatment of drug-resistant urinary tract infections: potential of an old drug not explored fully. Int Urol Nephrol 2017; 49 (09) 1637-1643 epub ahead of print
  • 4 Mandal J, Acharya NS, Buddhapriya D, Parija SC. Antibiotic resistance pattern among common bacterial uropathogens with a special reference to ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli. Indian J Med Res 2012; 136 (05) 842-849
  • 5 Collee JG, Miles RS, Watt B. Tests for identification of bacteria. In Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, eds.. Mackie and McCartney’s Practical Medical Microbiology, 14th edition. New York:Churchill Livingstone,. Elsevier Saunders; 2006; 135-144
  • 6 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 27th Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100–S27. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017
  • 7 Sobel JD, Kaye D. Urinary tract infections. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas and Benette’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th edition. Philadelphia:. Elsevier Saunders 2014; 886-913, Chapter 74
  • 8 Matthews PC, Barrett LK, Warren S. et al. Oral fosfomycin for treatment of urinary tract infection: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16 (01) 556
  • 9 Stein GE. Comparison of single dose fosfomycin and 7 days of nitrofurantoin in female patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Clin Ther 1992; 22: 1864-1872
  • 10 Van E Pienbroek, Hermans J, Kaptein AA, Mulder JD. Fosfomycin trometamol in a single dose versus seven days nitrofurantoin in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women. Pharm World Sci 1993; 15 (06) 257-262
  • 11 Huttner A, Kowalczyk A, Turjeman A. et al. Effect of 5 days nitrofurantoin vs single dose fosfomycin on clinical resolution of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection in women. JAMA 2018; 319: 1781-1789
  • 12 Giancola SE, Mahoney MV, Hogan MD, Raux BR, McCoy C, Hirsch EB. Assessment of fosfomycin for complicated or multidrug-resistant urinary tract infections: patient characteristics and outcomes. Chemotherapy 2017; 62 (02) 100-104
  • 13 Qiao LD, Zheng B, Chen S. et al. Evaluation of three-dose fosfomycin tromethamine in the treatment of patients with urinary tract infections: an uncontrolled, open-label, multicentre study. BMJ Open 2013; 3 (12) e004157 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004157.
  • 14 Khawaja AR, Khan FB, Dar TI, Bhat AH, Wani MS, Wazir BS. Fosfomycin tromethamine. Antibiotic of choice in the female patient: a multicenter study. Cent European J Urol 2015; 68 (03) 371-375