CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ann Natl Acad Med Sci 2021; 57(03): 102-106
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728972
Original Article

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis—Where Do We Stand?

Anuja Jha
1   Department of Pharmacology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and P.G. Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Manju Agrawal
2   Department of Pharmacology, Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
,
Rajesh Hishikar
3   Department of Pharmacology, Ayush and Health Sciences, University of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
,
Himanshu Shekhar Jha
4   Department of Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction Surgical site infection (SSI) is the commonest preventable health care–associated infection among postoperative cases. Several guidelines are available for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) and other measures which prevent SSI. National Center for Disease Control (NCDC), India, has also provided a guideline for prevention of SSI in 2016. In this study we have compared the NCDC, India, guideline with WHO (World health organization) and American Society of Health System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines. The timing of antimicrobial agent administration is the only parameter which is included in all the three guidelines. As per NCDC and ASHP it should be within 60 minutes of incision while as per WHO it is within 120 minutes of incision.

Materials and Methods This was a prospective observational study—104 patients undergoing surgery in general surgical ward between January 2016 and June 2017 were included in this study. The NCDC guideline was compared with WHO and ASHP guidelines. Real data comparison was done for those parameters which were included in all the three guidelines.

Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed using descriptive methods and chi-square test.

Results None of the patients in our study received SAP within 60 minutes of incision. In 70% cases it was administered within 2 hours of incision and in the remaining 30% it was administered after more than 2 hours. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSI among these two groups.

Conclusion NCDC SAP guideline helps in rational use of antimicrobials. Increasing the duration for SAP may be added in the NCDC guidelines. Inclusion of certain additional parameters like weight-based doses and consideration for other comorbidities will help in patient- and procedure-specific SAP. Antimicrobial stewardship should be encouraged in all the hospitals and should follow local antimicrobial resistance pattern. This will assist in therapy decision, policy making, and evidence-based treatment.



Publication History

Article published online:
11 May 2021

© 2021. National Academy of Medical Sciences (India). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW. et al Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (08) 784-791
  • 2 World Health Organization. Prevention of hospital-acquired infections. Available at: https://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/whocdscsreph200212.pdf
  • 3 Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection. JAMA Surgery 2017;152(8):784–791
  • 4 Bratzler DW, Houck PM. Surgical Infection Prevention Guideline Writers Workgroup. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project.. Am J Surg 2005; 189 (04) 395-404
  • 5 Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S. et al WHO Guidelines Development Group. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective.. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16 (12) e276-e287
  • 6 Mazaki T, Mado K, Masuda H, Shiono M, Tochikura N, Kaburagi M. A randomized trial of antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infection after open mesh-plug hernia repair. Am J Surg 2014; 207 (04) 476-484
  • 7 Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML. et al Guideline for prevention of surgicalsite in fection, 1999. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27 (02) 97-134
  • 8 American Society of Health- System Pharmacists. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Available at: https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/policy- guidelines/docs/therapeutic-guidelines/therapeutic- guidelines-antimicrobial-prophylaxis-surgery.ashx. Accessed April 7, 2021
  • 9 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery—a national clinical guideline. http://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign104.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed October 15, 2017
  • 10 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Surgical site infections: preventionand treatment. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg74. Published 2017. Accessed October 15, 2017
  • 11 National Centre for Disease Control. National Treatment Guidelines for Antimicrobial Use in Infectious Diseases. http://www.ncdc.gov.in/writereaddata/mainlinkfile/File622.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed October 15, 2017
  • 12 World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. http://www.who.int/gpsc/ssi-guidelines/en/. Published 2016. Accessed October 15, 2017
  • 13 Allegranzi B, BagheriNejad S, Combescure C. et al Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011; 377 (9761) 228-241
  • 14 Pitt D, Aubin JM. Joseph Lister: father of modern surgery. Can J Surg 2012; 55 (05) E8-E9
  • 15 Rehan HS, Kakkar AK, Goel S. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Int J Infect Control 2010. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.430.2608&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed April 7, 2021
  • 16 Kanjii S. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. In: DipiroJ T, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey LM, eds. Pharmacotherapy: A Physiological Approach. 9th ed. New York, NY: McGrawHill 2015: 1991-2006
  • 17 Tiri B, Bruzzone P, Priante G. et al Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: how to improve. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9 (04) 168
  • 18 Riggi G, Abbo LM. The role of antimicrobial stewardship programs to optimize antibiotics use in the surgical departments. In: Infections in Surgery. Cham:Springer 2021: 247-260