CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2021; 13(02): e129-e137
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728644
Research Article

Factors Influencing Choice of Medical Specialty among Ophthalmology and Non-Ophthalmology Residency Applicants

David Cui
1   Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Andreas M. Wingert
2   Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania
,
Ingrid U. Scott
3   Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
4   Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective The study aimed to investigate factors influencing choice of specialty among ophthalmology and non-ophthalmology residency applicants.

Patients and Methods Anonymous, web-based surveys were distributed through REDCap to the 2019 to 2020 residency applicants to the Penn State Department of Ophthalmology and, as a control group, Penn State medical students applying to non-ophthalmology residencies for the 2019 to 2020 cycle. The primary outcome was factors that influenced specialty choice among ophthalmology versus non-ophthalmology applicants. Secondary outcomes include hours of exposure to applicants' selected specialty in the medical school preclinical curriculum, and proportion of ophthalmology versus non-ophthalmology applicants who decided on, or developed a strong interest in, their specialty prior to clinical rotations.

Results Surveys were completed by 203/441 (46.0%) ophthalmology and 85/139 (61.1%) non-ophthalmology applicants. Fewer than 20 hours of exposure to an applicant's selected specialty were provided in the medical school preclinical curriculum for 86.7% of ophthalmology and 42.4% of non-ophthalmology applicants (p < 0.001). Ophthalmology applicants decided on, or developed a strong interest in, their selected specialty before clinical rotations at a similar rate to non-ophthalmology applicants (60.6 vs. 58.8%, respectively). Factors influencing specialty choice cited most commonly by ophthalmology applicants include professional satisfaction (94.1%), performing surgeries/procedures (92.6%), personal fit with specialty (91.1%), work-life balance (91.1%), and ability to see patients in a clinic setting (90.6%), compared to personal fit with specialty (95.3%)%, clinical rotation in selected specialty (95.3%), professional satisfaction (91.8%), intellectual stimulation (89.4%), and subinternship or away rotation (89.4%) among non-ophthalmology applicants.

Conclusion Professional satisfaction and personal fit with specialty were among the most commonly cited factors influencing specialty choice for both groups. Other factors cited most frequently by ophthalmology applicants include performing surgeries/procedures, work-life balance, and ability to see patients in a clinic setting. Despite limited ophthalmology exposure in medical school preclinical curricula, ophthalmology applicants decided on, or developed a strong interest in, their selected specialty before clinical rotations at a rate similar to non-ophthalmology applicants.



Publication History

Received: 06 October 2020

Accepted: 15 December 2020

Article published online:
10 November 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 San Francisco Match. Ophthalmology residency match summary report 2019. Accessed June 25, 2020 at: sfmatch.org/PDFFilesDisplay/Ophthalmology_Residency_Stats_2019.pdf
  • 2 The National Resident Matching Program. Advance data tables 2019 main residency match. Accessed June 25, 2020 at: nrmp.org/main-residency-match-data
  • 3 Medscape. Medscape physician compensation report. 2020 Accessed June 25, 2020 at: Medscape.com/slideshow/2020-compensation-overview
  • 4 Linz MO, Jun AS, Clever SL, Lawson SM, Sanyal A, Scott AW. Evaluation of medical students' perception of an ophthalmology career. Ophthalmology 2018; 125 (03) 461-462
  • 5 Lind DS, Cendan JC. Two decades of student career choice at the University of Florida: increasingly a lifestyle decision. Am Surg 2003; 69 (01) 53-55
  • 6 Schwartz RW, Jarecky RK, Strodel WE, Haley JV, Young B, Griffen Jr WO. Controllable lifestyle: a new factor in career choice by medical students. Acad Med 1989; 64 (10) 606-609
  • 7 Schmidt LE, Cooper CA, Guo WA. Factors influencing US medical students' decision to pursue surgery. J Surg Res 2016; 203 (01) 64-74
  • 8 Peel JK, Schlachta CM, Alkhamesi NA. A systematic review of the factors affecting choice of surgery as a career. Can J Surg 2018; 61 (01) 58-67
  • 9 Johnson AL, Sharma J, Chinchilli VM. et al. Why do medical students choose orthopaedics as a career?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (11) e78
  • 10 Goltz CJ, Bachusz RC, Mancini E, Rits Y, Mattos MA, Rubin JR. Medical student career survey--vascular surgery awareness initiative. Ann Vasc Surg 2013; 27 (02) 225-231
  • 11 Hsiao AM, Tatham AJ. Factors at medical school influencing students' decisions to pursue a career in ophthalmology. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32 (06) 1005-1007
  • 12 Madani FM, Alasiri R, Howldar S, Zagzoog F, Alhibshi N. Perceptions and career expectation in ophthalmology among saudi undergraduate medical students. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2018; 25 (3-4): 142-149
  • 13 Gameiro GR, Darcie ALF, Hazaki D, Gameiro GR, Carricondo PC. Why ophthalmology? Analysis of the motivating factors influencing the choice of ophthalmology as a career among different generations in Brazil. Clinics (São Paulo) 2019; 74: e1101
  • 14 Pankratz MJ, Helveston EM. Ophthalmology. The resident's perspective. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110 (01) 37-43
  • 15 Pianosi K, Bethune C, Hurley KF. Medical student career choice: a qualitative study of fourth-year medical students at Memorial University, Newfoundland. CMAJ Open 2016; 4 (02) E147-E152
  • 16 Yamane MLM, Kassotis AS, De Moraes CG, Dagi Glass LR. Correlating ophthalmology exposure in medical school to applying and matching into an ophthalmology residency. . [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 21] Acad Med 2020; 95 (11) 1770-1776
  • 17 Shah M, Knoch D, Waxman E. The state of ophthalmology medical student education in the United States and Canada, 2012 through 2013. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (06) 1160-1163
  • 18 Quillen DA, Harper RA, Haik BG. Medical student education in ophthalmology: crisis and opportunity. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (11) 1867-1868
  • 19 Moxon NR, Goyal A, Giaconi JA. et al. The state of ophthalmology medical student education in the United States: An update. Ophthalmology 2020; 127 (11) 1451-1453 [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 10]
  • 20 Quillen DA, Cantore WA. Impact of a 1-day ophthalmology experience on medical students. Ophthalmology 2006; 113 (12) 2307-2309
  • 21 Gelston CD, Patnaik JL. Ophthalmology training and competency levels in care of patients with ophthalmic complaints in United States internal medicine, emergency medicine and family medicine residents. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2019; 16: 25
  • 22 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
  • 23 Venincasa MJ, Cai LZ, Gedde SJ, Uhler T, Sridhar J. Current applicant perceptions of the ophthalmology residency match [published online ahead of print. JAMA Ophthalmol 2020
  • 24 Yousuf SJ, Kwagyan J, Jones LS. Applicants' choice of an ophthalmology residency program. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (02) 423-427
  • 25 Christakis TJ, Christakis PG, Chipman ML, Christakis JT. Medical students' attitudes on diversity when applying to Toronto's ophthalmology residency program. Can J Ophthalmol 2008; 43 (02) 218-221