CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2021; 100(S 02): S193-S194
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728348
Abstracts
Otology / Neurotology / Audiology

Determination of contact-specific insertion angles using planning software for cochlear implantation.

E Avallone
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, OE 9645, Hannover
,
T Lenarz
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, OE 9645, Hannover
,
M Timm
1   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, OE 9645, Hannover
› Author Affiliations
 

Objective Tthe cochlea structure can vary between subjects. In order to take this great anatomical variability into account, the anatomy of a specific cochlea can be identified with the help of clinical digital volume tomography (DVT) and the electrode array that optimally supplies the respective patient can be selected. The OTOPLAN surgical planning platform enables to approximate the dimensions of the cochlea within imaging data by measuring the basal cochlear diameters, commonly referred to as parameters A and B. It also enables the specific prediction of the insertion angle for CI electrode arrays. This study was conducted to evaluate the precision of these prevision and compare them to the measurement of the cochlear length of the lateral wall by multiplanar reconstruction (MPR).

Methods Using the planning software, preoperative DVT scans of MED-EL cochlear implant patients were evaluated. This evaluation included measurements of the respective values ??of A and B to approximate the cochlea length as well as the prediction of the contact-specific insertion angle of the implanted electrode array and the comparison of angles with MPR. These predictions were made using both the primary approximation method implemented (based on an equation proposed by Escudé) and a novel, recently proposed approach (called ECA). All prevision were then compared to the true insertion angles (measured with MPR) derived from post-OP DVT images of the identic patient.

Results: The novel ECA approach resulted in fewer estimation errors than the algorithm based on the Escudé formula.

Discussion this evaluation with a preoperative planning software turned out to be simple, fast and clinical feasible.

Poster-PDF A-1567.pdf



Publication History

Article published online:
13 May 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany