Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12(02): 293-300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727153
Research Article

Shared-Task Worklists Improve Clinical Trial Recruitment Workflow in an Academic Emergency Department

Kevin S. Naceanceno
1   Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Stacey L. House
2   Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Phillip V. Asaro
2   Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding K.S.N. was funded through Washington University School of Medicine Dean's Fellowship. There was otherwise no funding source for this project.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Clinical trials performed in our emergency department at Barnes-Jewish Hospital utilize a centralized infrastructure for alerting, screening, and enrollment with rule-based alerts sent to clinical research coordinators. Previously, all alerts were delivered as text messages via dedicated cellular phones. As the number of ongoing clinical trials increased, the volume of alerts grew to an unmanageable level. Therefore, we have changed our primary notification delivery method to study-specific, shared-task worklists integrated with our pre-existing web-based screening documentation system.

Objective To evaluate the effects on screening and recruitment workflow of replacing text-message delivery of clinical trial alerts with study-specific shared-task worklists in a high-volume academic emergency department supporting multiple concurrent clinical trials.

Methods We analyzed retrospective data on alerting, screening, and enrollment for 10 active clinical trials pre- and postimplementation of shared-task worklists.

Results Notifications signaling the presence of potentially eligible subjects for clinical trials were more likely to result in a screen (p < 0.001) with the implementation of shared-task worklists compared with notifications delivered as text messages for 8/10 clinical trials. The change in workflow did not alter the likelihood of a notification resulting in an enrollment (p = 0.473). The Director of Research reported a substantial reduction in the amount of time spent redirecting clinical research coordinator screening activities.

Conclusion Shared-task worklists, with the functionalities we have described, offer a viable alternative to delivery of clinical trial alerts via text message directly to clinical research coordinators recruiting for multiple concurrent clinical trials in a high-volume academic emergency department.

Keywords

alert fatigue - electronic health records - emergency department - clinical trials - workflow - clinical trial alerts - clinical trial recruitment

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study was reviewed and deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Washington University School of Medicine.




Publication History

Received: 10 November 2020

Accepted: 18 February 2021

Article published online:
07 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52 (12) 1143-1156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Haidich AB, Ioannidis JP. Patterns of patient enrollment in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54 (09) 877-883
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D. et al; STEPS group. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol Assess 2007; 11 (48) iii , ix-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Köpcke F, Prokosch HU. Employing computers for the recruitment into clinical trials: a comprehensive systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16 (07) e161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pressler TR, Yen PY, Ding J, Liu J, Embi PJ, Payne PR. Computational challenges and human factors influencing the design and use of clinical research participant eligibility pre-screening tools. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12: 47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Weng C, Batres C, Borda T. et al. A real-time screening alert improves patient recruitment efficiency. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011; 2011: 1489-1498
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Effoe VS, Katula JA, Kirk JK. et al; LIFT Diabetes Research Team. The use of electronic medical records for recruitment in clinical trials: findings from the Lifestyle Intervention for Treatment of Diabetes trial. Trials 2016; 17 (01) 496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Embi PJ, Jain A, Clark J, Harris CM. Development of an electronic health record-based clinical trial alert system to enhance recruitment at the point of care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005; 2005: 231-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Butte AJ, Weinstein DA, Kohane IS. Enrolling patients into clinical trials faster using RealTime Recuiting. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 2000: 111-115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Devoe C, Gabbidon H, Schussler N. et al. Use of electronic health records to develop and implement a silent best practice alert notification system for patient recruitment in clinical research: quality improvement initiative. JMIR Med Inform 2019; 7 (02) e10020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lai YS, Afseth JD. A review of the impact of utilising electronic medical records for clinical research recruitment. Clin Trials 2019; 16 (02) 194-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Embi PJ, Jain A, Clark J, Bizjack S, Hornung R, Harris CM. Effect of a clinical trial alert system on physician participation in trial recruitment. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165 (19) 2272-2277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ni Y, Kennebeck S, Dexheimer JW. et al. Automated clinical trial eligibility prescreening: increasing the efficiency of patient identification for clinical trials in the emergency department. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (01) 166-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Treweek S, Pearson E, Smith N. et al. Desktop software to identify patients eligible for recruitment into a clinical trial: using SARMA to recruit to the ROAD feasibility trial. Inform Prim Care 2010; 18 (01) 51-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Beauharnais CC, Larkin ME, Zai AH, Boykin EC, Luttrell J, Wexler DJ. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an automated screening algorithm in an inpatient clinical trial. Clin Trials 2012; 9 (02) 198-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ni Y, Wright J, Perentesis J. et al. Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 15: 28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Meystre SM, Heider PM, Kim Y, Aruch DB, Britten CD. Automatic trial eligibility surveillance based on unstructured clinical data. Int J Med Inform 2019; 129: 13-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Shivade C, Hebert C, Lopetegui M, de Marneffe MC, Fosler-Lussier E, Lai AM. Textual inference for eligibility criteria resolution in clinical trials. J Biomed Inform 2015; 58 (Suppl): S211-S218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ni Y, Bermudez M, Kennebeck S, Liddy-Hicks S, Dexheimer J. A real-time automated patient screening system for clinical trials eligibility in an emergency department: design and evaluation. JMIR Med Inform 2019; 7 (03) e14185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cofield SS, Conwit R, Barsan W, Quinn J. Recruitment and retention of patients into emergency medicine clinical trials. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17 (10) 1104-1112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Simon LE, Rauchwerger AS, Chettipally UK. et al. Text message alerts to emergency physicians identifying potential study candidates increase clinical trial enrollment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (11) 1360-1363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jegzentis K, Nowe T, Brunecker P. et al. Automated real-time text messaging as a means for rapidly identifying acute stroke patients for clinical trials. Trials 2014; 15: 304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Isaacman DJ, Reynolds EA. Effect of a research nurse on patient enrollment in a clinical study. Pediatr Emerg Care 1996; 12 (05) 340-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wickham H. ed. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 25 R Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020
    Google Scholar