PDF herunterladen
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 70(03): 189-198
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727131
Original Cardiovascular

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Transfemoral Access

Dritan Useini 
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Blerta Beluli
2   Department of Internal Medicine, St. Anna Hospital, Herne, Germany
,
Hildegard Christ
3   Department of Medical Statistics, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
,
Markus Schlömicher
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Polykarpos Patsalis
4   Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Peter Haldenwang
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Justus Strauch
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

Introduction Though transfemoral (TF) access has emerged as a gold standard access for patients with aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), there has been no study that has characterized patients who cannot undergo TF access in detail. We aim to evaluate the contraindications for TF access, their incidence, classify them, and provide the outcomes of patients who failed to be TF candidates.

Methods From 925 patients who underwent TAVI between February 2014 and May 2020 at our heart center, 130 patients failed to be TF candidates and underwent transapical-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI). In this study, we included all those patients who failed to be TF candidates and underwent TA-TAVI using the third-generation balloon expandable valve (Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve [S3]) (116 patients; STS score 6.07 ± 4.4; age 79.4 ± 7).

Results The incidence of patients unsuitable for TF access at our heart center was 14%. We classified this TAVI population into absolute contraindication for TF access n = 84 (72.5%) and increased interventional risk for TF access n = 32 (27.5%). After TA-TAVI of this specific population using S3, the in-hospital mortality and stroke were 1.7 and 1.7%, respectively. The vascular injury rate was 1.7%. We registered no paravalvular leakage ≥2. The pacemaker rate was 7.4%. The mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 8.7 mm Hg.

Conclusion The incidence of patients who cannot undergo TF access or who are at high interventional risk is considerably high. TA-TAVI, supported with sufficient interventional experience and appropriate valve system, represents an excellent alternative for patients with distinct vasculopathy.

Keywords

heart center - transapical - TF-TAVI - COPD - peripheral vascular disease - aorta

Authors' Contributions

D.U. contributed to the conception, design, data collection, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, drafting, and revising of the work. B.B. contributed to the conception, design, and revising of the work. H.C. contributed to the statistics, analysis, and interpretation of data and revision. M.S., P.P., and P.H. contributed to data collection and revision. J.S. contributed substantially to the design and intellectual revision of the work. All authors approve this final version for publication and agree to be accountable for all aspects of this work.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 23. Dezember 2020

Angenommen: 12. Februar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Buzzatti N, Sala A, Alfieri O. Comparing traditional aortic valve surgery and transapical approach to transcatheter aortic valve implant. Eur Heart J Suppl 2020; 22 (suppl E): E7-E12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Patel JS, Krishnaswamy A, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Mick S, Kapadia SR. Access options for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with unfavorable aortoiliofemoral anatomy. Curr Cardiol Rep 2016; 18 (11) 110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Vemulapalli S, Carroll JD, Mack MJ. et al. Procedural volume and outcomes for transcatheter aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (26) 2541-2550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P. et al; Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145 (01) 6-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Walther T, Dewey T, Borger MA. et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation: step by step. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87 (01) 276-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ. et al; PARTNER 2 Investigators. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (17) 1609-1620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Auffret V, Lefevre T, Van Belle E. et al; FRANCE TAVI Investigators. Temporal trends in transcatheter aortic valve replacement in France: FRANCE 2 to FRANCE TAVI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70 (01) 42-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M. et al; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (17) 1597-1607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Patsalis PC, Alotaibi S, Wolf A. et al. Feasibility of transfemoral aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic disease and simultaneous or sequential endovascular aortic repair. J Invasive Cardiol 2019; 31 (10) 289-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Folliguet T, Laurent N, Bertram M. et al. Transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve implantation: multicentre experience in France. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 53 (01) 157-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dahle TG, Kaneko T, McCabe JM. Outcomes following subclavian and axillary artery access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Society of the Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry Report. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12 (07) 662-669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Beurtheret S, Karam N, Resseguier N. et al. Femoral versus nonfemoral peripheral access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74 (22) 2728-2739
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kirker E, Korngold E, Hodson RW. et al. Transcarotid versus subclavian/axillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN 3. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110 (06) 1892-1897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Binder RK, Rodés-Cabau J, Wood DA. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3: a new balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6 (03) 293-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Toppen W, Suh W, Aksoy O. et al. Vascular complications in the Sapien 3 Era: continued role of transapical approach to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 30 (02) 144-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Suri RM, Minha S, Alli O. et al. Learning curves for transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: technical performance, success, and safety. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152 (03) 773-780.e14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Long A, Mahoney P. Comparative intermediate-term outcomes of subclavian and transcaval access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Invasive Cardiol 2020; 32 (12) 463-469
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Beve M, Auffret V, Belhaj Soulami R. et al. Comparison of the transarterial and transthoracic approaches in nontransfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2019; 123 (09) 1501-1509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Madigan M, Atoui R. Non-transfemoral access sites for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10 (07) 4505-4515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Généreux P, Webb JG, Svensson LG. et al; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60 (12) 1043-1052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zhan Y, Lofftus S, Kawabori M, Soin A, Chen FY. A meta-analysis comparing transaxillary and transaortic transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 69 (01) 19-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Useini D, Haldenwang P, Schlömicher M. et al. Mid-term outcomes after transapical and transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta with a systematic review of transfemoral versus transapical approach. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 68 (07) 623-632
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Vasa-Nicotera M, Sinning JM, Chin D. et al. Impact of paravalvular leakage on outcome in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5 (08) 858-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT. et al; PARTNER Publications Office. Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8 (1 Pt A): 60-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH. et al; PARTNER 3 Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (18) 1695-1705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ghatak A, Bavishi C, Cardoso RN. et al. Complications and mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Edwards SAPIEN & SAPIEN XT valves: a meta-analysis of world-wide studies and registries comparing the transapical and transfemoral accesses. J Interv Cardiol 2015; 28 (03) 266-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar