Comparing Eyesi Virtual Reality Simulator and Traditional Teaching Methods for Direct Ophthalmoscopy: Students' Perspectives at Indiana University School of Medicine

Hanna L. Tso; Jason Young; C. W. Yung

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1726349

Journal of Academic Ophthalmology, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2021; 13(01): e66-e72
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726349

Research Article

Comparing Eyesi Virtual Reality Simulator and Traditional Teaching Methods for Direct Ophthalmoscopy: Students' Perspectives at Indiana University School of Medicine

Hanna L. Tso

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

,

Jason Young

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

,

C. W. Yung

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background The fundus examination is an essential part of any ophthalmologic evaluation. However, medical students and primary care physicians often lack confidence with direct ophthalmoscopy. Virtual reality simulators are being employed in medical education to teach this technically challenging examination.

Objective To compare medical student ratings of the Eyesi Direct Ophthalmoscope Simulator and traditional small group teaching methods for learning direct ophthalmoscopy skills.

Methods All medical students at Indiana University School of Medicine traditionally learn direct ophthalmoscopy in their first 2 years during a small group session led by a physician instructor. Students who later enrolled in ophthalmology clinical electives during 2019 and 2020 were invited to additionally complete the Eyesi Direct Ophthalmoscope Simulator virtual reality curriculum. A voluntary, anonymous survey was sent between June and August 2020 to students who had completed both the traditional and Eyesi simulator sessions. Students were asked to rate their confidence in performing direct ophthalmoscopy following each session, and to indicate which teaching method was superior and why. Chi-square analysis was used to compare categorical variables.

Results Students' confidence ratings for performing direct ophthalmoscopy were significantly higher following completion of the Eyesi simulator session compared with the traditional small group session (p < 0.001). Four-fifths of respondents felt that the Eyesi simulator was superior to the traditional small group for learning the skills of direct ophthalmoscopy, while one-fifth felt that the two sessions were equally effective (p < 0.001). None of the students responded that the small group session was the superior teaching method.

Conclusion The Eyesi Direct Ophthalmoscope Simulator was rated highly among medical students and offers distinct learning advantages that could not be replicated in a traditional small group environment, such as providing numerous examples of pathological findings and allowing unlimited examination time without concern for patient's inconvenience or light exposure. The Eyesi simulator is a promising tool for teaching direct ophthalmoscopy to medical students. Ultimately, familiarity with the fundus examination will enable future physicians across specialties to better evaluate and appropriately refer patients with ocular fundus pathology.

Keywords

medical education - direct ophthalmoscopy - Eyesi - virtual reality simulator

Full Text

References

References
1 World Health Organization. Causes of blindness and visual impairment. 2020 . Accessed August 6, 2020 at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment
2 Wong WL, Su X, Li X. et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014; 2 (02) e106-e116
3 Mackay DD, Garza PS, Bruce BB, Newman NJ, Biousse V. The demise of direct ophthalmoscopy: a modern clinical challenge. Neurol Clin Pract 2015; 5 (02) 150-157
4 Rodenbeck SJ, Mackay DD. Examining the ocular fundus in neurology. Curr Opin Neurol 2019; 32 (01) 105-110
5 Kelly LP, Garza PS, Bruce BB, Graubart EB, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Teaching ophthalmoscopy to medical students (the TOTeMS study). Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 156 (05) 1056-1061.e10
6 Mackay DD, Garza PS, Bruce BB. et al. Teaching ophthalmoscopy to medical students (TOTeMS) II: a one-year retention study. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 157 (03) 747-748
7 Stern GA. The Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology Education Committee. Teaching ophthalmology to primary care physicians. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113 (06) 722-724
8 Gupta RR, Lam WC. Medical students' self-confidence in performing direct ophthalmoscopy in clinical training. Can J Ophthalmol 2006; 41 (02) 169-174
9 Shuttleworth GN, Marsh GW. How effective is undergraduate and postgraduate teaching in ophthalmology?. Eye (Lond) 1997; 11 (Pt 5): 744-750
10 Ricci LH, Ferraz CA. Ophthalmoscopy simulation: advances in training and practice for medical students and young ophthalmologists. Adv Med Educ Pract 2017; 8: 435-439
11 Bukhari AA. The clinical utility of eye exam simulator in enhancing the competency of family physician residents in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Saudi Med J 2014; 35 (11) 1361-1366
12 Boden KT, Rickmann A, Fries FN. et al. Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator for learning direct ophthalmoscopy in student teaching [in German]. Ophthalmologe 2020; 117 (01) 44-49
13 Borgersen NJ, Skou Thomsen AS, Konge L, Sørensen TL, Subhi Y. Virtual reality-based proficiency test in direct ophthalmoscopy. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; 96 (02) e259-e261
14 Bénard-Séguin É, Kwok J, Liao W, Baxter S. Use of a fundus photograph matching program in imparting proficiency in ophthalmoscopy. Can J Ophthalmol 2018; 53 (05) 480-485
15 VRmagic. Eyesi direct. 2020 . Accessed August 6, 2020 at: https://www.vrmagic.com/medical-simulators/Eyesi-direct-ophthalmoscope