Endoscopy 2021; 53(S 01): S142
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724636
Abstracts | ESGE Days
ESGE Days 2021 Digital poster exhibition

Non-Ampullary Sporadic Duodenal Adenomas: Time For A Consensus On Endoscopic Resection?

L Materacki
1   North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology, Bristol, United Kingdom
,
D Napier
2   Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
,
D Tate
3   Ghent University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Ghent, Belgium
,
J Anderson
2   Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
 

Aims Sporadic duodenal adenomas (SDAs) are a rare but important finding at gastroscopy due to their malignant potential. Although endoscopic resection (ER) is generally advocated this carries significant risk related to the relatively thin, vascular and fixed duodenal wall. The lack of guidelines related to SDAs leads to variability in their management with potential implications for patient outcomes.

This descriptive study aimed to evaluate current practice regarding the management of non-ampullary SDAs and assess the need for a consensus.

Methods 40 internationally renowned advanced endoscopists from multiple international centres were surveyed regarding their management of non-ampullary SDAs. 12 questions investigating factors influencing whether to offer ER, pre-ER work-up, procedural risk and post-ER management were evaluated.

Results The survey was completed by 19 endoscopists with 18 confirming they endoscopically manage non-ampullary SDAs. Most endoscopists offered ER on a case-by-case basis with patient age (72 %), comorbidities (44 %) and lesion size (39 %) reported as integral to decision-making. No guidelines were used by 94 % but pre-procedure MDT discussion was arranged routinely by 67 % and selectively by 22 % of endoscopists. Endoscopists completed further investigation pre-ER including endoscopic ultrasound (39 %) and cross-sectional imaging (22 %). The quoted risk of ER including haemorrhage (1-50 %, median 15 %) and perforation (0.7-10 %, median 3 %) was variable.

Anti-coagulation and anti-platelets were restarted a median of 3 days (IQR 2-7 days) post-ER. Post-procedural PPIs were routinely prescribed by 94 % however therapy duration was variable (median 29 days, IQR 14-30 days). Patients were admitted routinely post-ER by 39 % and in specific cases by 56 %.

Conclusions There is widespread variability in the pre- and post-procedural management of non-ampullary SDAs in major international centres. The majority of endoscopists manage patients on a case-by-case basis following MDT discussion and advocate PPI therapy post-ER. There is a need to develop a consensus of opinion to help standardise the management of non-ampullary SDAs.

Citation Materacki L, Napier D, Tate D et al. eP140 NON-AMPULLARY SPORADIC DUODENAL ADENOMAS: TIME FOR A CONSENSUS ON ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION?. Endoscopy 2021; 53: S142.



Publication History

Article published online:
19 March 2021

© 2021. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany