Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaires: Exploring Responsiveness and Diagnostic Performance in a Sample of Outpatients with and without Hand and Wrist Complaints^[*]

Abstract

Objective The present study aimed to verify whether, in an adult population with nontraumatic complaints in the upper limbs, (1) the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) are susceptible to a “ceiling effect” when compared with a sample of healthy subjects; and (2) to determine cutoff points for diagnostic performance and the intercorrelation for DASH and MHQ in both samples.

Methods This was a prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study. In total, 150 subjects were included, with 75 in the case group (with disease) and 75 in the control group (without disease). This was a sample of patients recently admitted to a hand surgery outpatient clinic. Controls were matched to clinical cases according to inclusion. The ceiling effect was determined by a maximum response rate (> 15%); receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined cutoff points for sickness definition, and DASH and MHQ sensitivity and specificity. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results The DASH and MHQ questionnaires had no ceiling effect for the case group. In this group, 18 (24%) patients had the maximum DASH score, but none (0%) had the maximum MHQ score. For the control group, 1 (1.33%) subject had the maximum DASH score, but none scored for MHQ. For case determination, DASH scores of 7.1 had 80% sensitivity and 60.3% specificity, whereas MHQ scores of 76.9 had 56.2% sensitivity and 97.3% specificity.

Conclusion The DASH and MHQ questionnaires are reliable tools to measure the impact of hand and wrist morbidities on daily activities, and they are not susceptible to ceiling effects. The DASH questionnaire is more sensitive for patient identification, whereas the MHQ is more specific. As such, the MHQ seems more appropriate when a more specific functional increase is expected.

Keywords

hand trauma/surgery - shoulder - arm - disability assessment - surveys and questionnaires

Financial Support

There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.

^* Study developed at the Medical Residence Program in Hand Surgery and Microsurgery, Hospital Alvorada, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Publication History

Received: 19 June 2020

Accepted: 14 October 2020

Article published online:
30 June 2022

• Referências

• 1 Orfale AG, Araújo PM, Ferraz MB, Natour J. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res 2005; 38 (02) 293-302
• 2 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29 (06) 602-608
• 3 Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998; l 23 (04) 575-587
• 4 Kim SJ, Lee BG, Lee CH, Choi WS, Kim JH, Lee KH. Comparison of ceiling effects between two patient-rating scores and a physician-rating score in the assessment of outcome after the surgical treatment of distal radial fractures. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B (12) 1651-1656
• 5 Ribeiro NP, Schier AR, Silva ACO, Nardi AE. Traducao e adaptacao transcultural do Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Bras Psiquiatr 2011; 60 (02) 99-110
• 6 Wang L, Zhang Z, McArdle JJ, Salthouse TA. Investigating Ceiling Effects in Longitudinal Data Analysis. Multivariate Behav Res 2009; 43 (03) 476-496
• 7 McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. Qual Life Res 1995; 4 (04) 293-307
• 8 Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1991
• 9 de Moraes VY, Ferrari PM, Gracitelli GC, Faloppa F, Belloti JC. Outcomes in orthopedics and traumatology: translating research into practice. Acta Ortop Bras 2014; 22 (06) 330-333
• 10 Nolte MT, Shauver MJ, Chung KC. Normative Values of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire for Patients with and without Hand Conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (03) 425e-433e
• 11 Shauver MJ, Chung KC. The Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire after 15 years of field trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (05) 779e-787e
• 12 Maia MV, de Moraes VY, Dos Santos JB, Faloppa F, Belloti JC. Minimal important difference after hand surgery: a prospective assessment for DASH, MHQ, and SF-12. SICOT J 2016; 2: 32
• 13 McMillan CR, Binhammer PA. Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand (N Y) 2009; 4 (03) 311-318
• 14 Paranaíba VF, Santos JB, Raduan Neto J, Moraes VY, Belotti JC, Faloppa F. Aplicação do PRWE na fratura da extremidade distal do rádio: comparação e correlação com desfechos consagrados. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 52 (03) 278-283
• 15 Figueiredo S, Pereira AD, Silva MS, Leite L, Costa G, Silva C. Correlações clínicas, funcionais e imagiológicas após artroplastia da articulação metacarpofalangiana com implante de silicone na mão reumatoide. Rev Bras Ortop 2018; 53 (02) 208-212
• 16 Waljee JF, Kim HM, Burns PB, Chung KC. Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (01) 208-220
• 17 Ibrahim S, Meleppuram JJ. Estudo retrospectivo da placa anterior superior como tratamento para fraturas instáveis da clavícula distal (tipo 2 de Neer). Rev Bras Ortop 2018; 53 (03) 306-313