Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Urología Colombiana / Colombian Urology Journal 2022; 31(01): e12-e20
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724046
Original Article | Artículo Original
General Urology / Urología General

Licencia parental durante la educación y la práctica en medicina: 35 años de análisis bibliométrico

Parental Leave during Medical Education and Practice: 35 years of Bibliometric Analysis
Daisy Ximena Roa 
1   Uróloga, Cooperativa Especializada de servicios urológicos del Tolima, UROTOL
,
Silvia Riveros 
2   Uróloga, Compensar EPS, PAC, Colmedica MP
,
Maria Paula Saenz
3   Uróloga, Clínica Universidad de la Sabana
,
Joan Stefany Duque 
4   Uróloga, Hospital infantil universitario de San Jose. Instituto Roosevelt
,
Catalina Sanchez 
5   Uróloga, Clínica Nueva el Lago
,
Catalina Solano
6   Uróloga, Uroclin
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Resumen

Objetivos La cantidad de mujeres en especialidades médico-quirúrgicas ha aumentado. Para nuestro conocimiento, no existen políticas que reglamenten las licencias parentales en nuestro país, que permitan a las mujeres que se desempeñan en esas especialidades vivir dicho periodo digna y equiparablemente con quienes han elegido otras carreras. Nuestro objetivo, es evaluar las publicaciones con respecto a la regulación y al apoyo a los procesos de maternidad y lactancia de los médicos.

Metodos Se realizó una revisión de la literatura, de los últimos 35 años en Medline a través de Fabumed, PubReminer y Scopus, utilizando los términos Mesh: “parental leave” y “physicians”. Se incluyeron todas las publicaciones sobre licencia de maternidad en médicos, de 1984 a 2019. Se hizo un análisis bibliométrico descriptivo retrospectivo de dichos artículos y un análisis de mapeo bibliométrico utilizando el programa de software: VOSviewer. Se realizó un análisis estadístico descriptivo de los datos obtenidos.

Resultados Encontramos 182 publicaciones desde 1984 hasta 2019. Detectamos dos picos de publicación, en los años 1992 y 2018. El 39,6% de las publicaciones está concentrado en 20 revistas, nueve con factor de impacto mayor a 3. La mayoría de las publicaciones (85%) se encontraron en inglés y se originaron en 12 países.

Conclusiones Aún no hay suficientes publicaciones para generar consenso en cuanto a aspectos relacionados con la reglamentación de la licencia de maternidad y lactancia en cirujanas. La estandarización de políticas, optimiza el ejercicio de la especialidad al mejorar el grado de satisfacción de los involucrados.

Abstract

Objectives the number of women in a surgical medical specialty has increased over time. To our knowledge, there are no politics that rule parental leave in our country, with the goal of allowing women who work in these specialties to live through this period in a dignifying and comparable way as their equals who have made other career choices. The aim of this study is to assess the publications about regulation and support of maternity and breastfeeding for female doctors during their training and professional lives.

Methods A literature search using Mesh terms “parental leave” and “physicians”, including articles published in the last 35 years, was performed through Medline, Fabumed, PubReminer and Scopus. Every publication regarding parental leave in medical doctors from 1984 to 2019 was included. Descriptive retrospective bibliometric analysis and bibliometric mapping analysis were performed of the above-mentioned articles using VOSviewer software. Finally, a statistical descriptive analysis was performed with the obtained data.

Results 184 publications from 1984 to 2019 were found. 2 Publication peaks were identified, in 1992 and 2018. 39.6% of publications are concentrated in 20 journals, 9 of which have an Impact Factor greater than 3. Most of the publications (85%) were found in English language and originated in 12 countries.

Conclusions There are not enough publications to generate consensus related to the ruling of parental leave and breastfeeding in female surgeons. The standardization of politics for a specialty, optimizes its performance, as it improves the satisfaction degree of those involved.

Palabras clave

asignación por maternidad - médicos - lactancia - especialización - bibliométrico

Keywords

parental leave - physicians - breastfeeding - specialization - bibliometrics


Publication History

Received: 31 August 2020

Accepted: 22 December 2020

Article published online:
05 August 2021

© 2022. Sociedad Colombiana de Urología. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referencias

  • 1 Sayres M, Wyshak G, Denterlein G, Apfel R, Shore E, Federman D. Pregnancy during residency. N Engl J Med 1986; 314 (07) 418-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tamburrino MB, Evans CL, Campbell NB, Franco KN, Jurs SG, Pentz JE. Physician pregnancy: male and female colleagues' attitudes. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972) 1992; 47 (03) 82-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bickel J. Women in medical education. A status report. N Engl J Med 1988; 319 (24) 1579-1584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Franco K, Evans CL, Best AP, Zrull JP, Pizza GA. Conflicts associated with physicians' pregnancies. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140 (07) 902-904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Turner PL, Lumpkins K, Gabre J, Lin MJ, Liu X, Terrin M. Pregnancy among women surgeons: trends over time. Arch Surg 2012; 147 (05) 474-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hutchinson AM, Anderson III NS, Gochnour GL, Stewart C. Pregnancy and childbirth during family medicine residency training. Fam Med 2011; 43 (03) 160-165
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rose SH, Burkle CM, Elliott BA, Koenig LF. The impact of parental leave on extending training and entering the board certification examination process: a specialty-based comparison. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81 (11) 1449-1453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cole S, Arnold M, Sanderson A, Cupp C. Pregnancy during otolaryngology residency: experience and recommendations. Am Surg 2009; 75 (05) 411-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Association of American Medical Colleges. Table 27: Total graduates by US medical school and sex, 2010–2014. https://www.aamc.org/download/321532/data/factstable27-2.pdf . Accessed September 30, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Smith C, Galante JM, Pierce JL, Scherer LA. The surgical residency baby boom: changing patterns of childbearing during residency over a 30-year span. J Grad Med Educ 2013; 5 (04) 625-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Dekker R, Van Den Berg J. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. J Accessed 13 Sep 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Waltman L, van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. 2010 http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1032
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 American Association of Medical Colleges Graduate Medical Education Track. (2006 Data) and American Medical Association (1996 Data). American Association of Medical Colleges; . Accessed 2009 at www.aamc.org
    Google Scholar
  • 14 American Association of Medical Colleges. The State of Women in Academic Medicine: The Pipeline and Pathways to Leadership, 2015-2016. AAMC GME
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brower BA, Jennings MM, Butterworth ML, Crawford ME. Women in Podiatry and Medicine. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2019; 36 (04) 707-716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Burkhart J. AMA-RPS instrumental in achieving new maternity leave policy. JAMA 1991; 265 (13) 1756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Varda BK, Glover M. Specialty board leave policies for resident physicians requesting parental leave. JAMA 2018; 320 (22) 2374-2377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar