PDF herunterladen
Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(01): 076-080
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723826
Original Article

120 Years of Dorsal Preservation in Rhinoplasty

Chew Lip Ng 
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
,
Alwyn Ray D'Souza
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Dorsal preservation techniques in rhinoplasty are experiencing a renaissance in recent years. New techniques and modifications to existing techniques are being described at an intensifying pace. Dorsal preservation, however, is not a new concept and was first described over 120 years ago. It is timely that we conduct a review of the key techniques and concepts of dorsal preservation in rhinoplasty that had been published over the past 120 years, at a moment in which we consider as a revival of this school of thought.

Keywords

preservation rhinoplasty - dorsal preservation - rhinoplasty - history of rhinoplasty


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Februar 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Santos M, Monteiro D, Coutinho M, , E Sousa CA, Ferreira MG. Caucasian Mediterranean patients seeking rhinoplasty-Anthropometric measurements and prevalence of major deformities. Clin Otolaryngol 2019; 44 (04) 581-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Goodale JL. A new method for the operative correction of exaggerated roman nose. Boston Med Surg J 1899; 140: 112
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Lothrop OA. An operation for correcting the aquiline nasal deformity; the use of new instrument: report of a case. Boston Med Surg J 1914; 170: 835-837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cottle MH. Nasal roof repair and hump removal. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 1954; 60 (04) 408-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Joseph J. Beiträge zur Rhinoplastik. Berl Klin Wochenschrift 1907; 16: 470-472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Stergiou G, Tremp M, Finocchi V, Saban Y. Functional and Radiological Assessment After Preservation Rhinoplasty – A Clinical Study. In Vivo 2020; 34 (05) 2659-2665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Taş BM, Erden B. Comparison of nasal functional outcomes of let down rhinoplasty and open technical rhinoplasty using spreader graft. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06270-7. [epub ahead of print]
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Levin M, Ziai H, Roskies M. Patient satisfaction following structural versus preservation rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36 (05) 670-678
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Daniel RK. The preservation rhinoplasty: a new rhinoplasty revolution. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (02) 228-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Daniel RK. Ed. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Daniel RK. What is preservation rhinoplasty: rationale and overview. In: Cakir B, Saban Y, Daniel RK, Palhazi P. eds. Preservation Rhinoplasty. Turkey: Septum Publications; 2018
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kosins AM, Daniel RK. Decision making in preservation rhinoplasty: A 100 case series with 1-year follow-up. Aesth Surg J 2019; 40 (01) 34-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tas S. Dorsal roof technique for dorsum preservation in rhinoplasty. Aesth Surg J 2020; 40 (03) 263-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sheen JH. Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (02) 230-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kern EB. Surgical approaches to abnormalities of the nasal valve. Rhinology 1978; 16 (03) 165-189
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Santos M, Rego AR, Coutinho M, Sousa CAE, Ferreira MG. Spare roof technique in reduction rhinoplasty: prospective study of the first one hundred patients. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (12) 2702-2706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Apaydin F. Nasal valve surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (02) 179-191
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kosins AM. My first 50 dorsal preservation rhinoplasties. In: Cakir B, Saban Y, Daniel RK, Palhazi P. eds. Preservation Rhinoplasty. Turkey: Septum Publications; 2018
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Cabbarzade C. A new practically designed punch for preservation rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (02) e2656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Saban Y, Andretto Amodeo C, Hammou JC, Polselli R. An anatomical study of the nasal superficial musculoaponeurotic system: surgical applications in rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (02) 109-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cakir B, Oreroğlu AR, Doğan T, Akan M. A complete subperichondrial dissection technique for rhinoplasty with management of the nasal ligaments. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (05) 564-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cerkes N. Concurrent elevation of the upper lateral cartilage perichondrium and nasal bone periosteum for management of dorsum: the perichondro-periosteal flap. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (06) 899-914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Neves JC, Tago DA, Dewes W. et al. The split preservation rhinoplasty: “the Vitruvian Man split maneuvre. Eur J Plast Surg 2020; 43: 323-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Neves JC, Arancibia Tagle D, Dewes W, Ferraz M. The segmental preservation rhinoplasty: the split tetris concept. Facial Plast Surg 2020; DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714672. [epub ahead of print]
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: the retractable roof. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (06) 976-983 , discussion 984
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gola R, Nerini A, Laurent-Fyon C, Waller PY. [Conservative rhinoplasty of the nasal canopy]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1989; 34 (06) 465-475
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Gola R. [Conservative rhinoplasty]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1994; 38 (03) 239-252
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Saban Y, Daniel RK, Polselli R, Trapasso M, Palhazi P. Dorsal preservation: the push down technique reassessed. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (02) 117-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Saban Y, Braccini F, Polselli R. [Rhinoplasty: morphodynamic anatomy of rhinoplasty. Interest of conservative rhinoplasty]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2006; 127 (1-2): 15-22
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Saban Y, Polselli R, Perrone F. Anatomie chirugie de la rhinoplastie. In: Bessede JP. ed. Chirugie Plastique Esthetique de la Face et du Cou. 2nd Vol. Issy-les Moulineaux, France: Elsevier-Masson; 2012: 133-153
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Gonçalves Ferreira M, Santos M, Rosa F. et al. Spare roof technique: a new technique for hump removal-the step-by-step guide. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 403-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Goksel A, Saban Y. Open Piezo preservation rhinoplasty: a case report of the new rhinoplasty approach. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (01) 113-118
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Finochi V. SPQR technique: simplified preservation of quick rhinoplasty. Med Jadert 2020; 50: 14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Öztürk G. Combination of the push-down and let-down techniques: mix-down approaches. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-02012-6. [epub ahead of print]
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tuncel U, Aydogdu IO, Kurt A. Reducing dorsal hump recurrence following push down-let down rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2020; sjaa145 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa145. [epub ahead of print]
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Becker DG, Toriumi DM, Gross CW, Tardy Jr ME. Powered instrumentation for dorsal reduction. Facial Plast Surg 1997; 13 (04) 291-297
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Davis RE, Raval J. Powered instrumentation for nasal bone reduction: advantages and indications. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (05) 384-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Gerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The role of Piezoelectric instrumentation in rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (01) 21-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Greywoode JD, Pribitkin EA. Sonic rhinoplasty: histologic correlates and technical refinements using the ultrasonic bone aspirator. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (05) 316-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Sadri A, East C, Badia L, Saban Y. Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: core beam computed tomography analysis of the nasal vault, septum, and skull base-its role in surgical planning. Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36 (03) 329-334
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Moscatiello F, Herrero Jover J, González Ballester MA, Carreño Hernández E, Piombino P, Califano L. Preoperative digital three-dimensional planning for rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34 (02) 232-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Skooq T. A method of hump removal in rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 1966; 83 (03) 283-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Huizing EH. Push-down of the external nasal pyramid by resection of wedges. Rhinology 1975; 13 (04) 185-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Jankowski R. Septorhinoplasty by modeling disarticulation. Fr ORL - 2006; 90: 225–2. Presented at the meeting: Société O.R.L. de l'Est (SORLEF) - St Dié 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Boulanger N, Baumann C, Beurton R. et al. Septorhinoplasty by disarticulation: early assessment of a new technique for morphological correction of crooked noses. Rhinology 2013; 51 (01) 77-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ishida J, Ishida LC, Ishida LH, Vieira JC, Ferreira MC. Treatment of the nasal hump with preservation of the cartilaginous framework. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (06) 1729-1733 , discussion 1734–1735
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ferreira MG, Monteiro D, Reis C, Almeida e Sousa C. Spare Roof technique: a middle third new technique. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (01) 111-116
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ferreira MG, Dias DR, Cardoso L. et al. Dorsal hump reduction based on the new ethmoidal point classification: a clinical and radiological study of the keystone area in 138 patients. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (09) 950-959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Palhazi P, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The osseocartilaginous vault of the nose: anatomy and surgical observations. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (03) 242-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar