The Chimeric Gracilis and Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: Characterizing This Novel Flap Configuration with Angiography and a Cadaveric ModelFunding This study received financial support from Mayo Clinic.
Background A chimerically configured gracilis and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is highly prevalent based on recent computed tomography (CT)-imaging data. The purpose of this study is to further characterize the vascular anatomy of this novel flap configuration and determine the feasibility of flap dissection.
Methods To characterize flap arterial anatomy, lower extremity CT angiograms performed from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. To characterize venous anatomy and determine the feasibility of flap harvest, the lower extremities of cadavers were evaluated.
Results A total of 974 lower extremity CT angiograms and 32 cadavers were included for the assessment. Of the 974 CT angiograms, majority (966, 99%) were bilateral studies, yielding a total of 1,940 lower extremities (right-lower-extremity = 970 and left-lower-extremity = 970) for radiographic evaluation. On CT angiography, a chimerically configured gracilis and PAP flap was found in 51% of patients (n = 494/974). By laterality, chimeric anatomy was present in 26% of right lower extremities (n = 254/970) and 25% of left lower extremities (n = 240/970); bilateral chimeric anatomy was found in 12% (n = 112/966) of patients. Average length of the common arterial pedicle feeding both gracilis and PAP flap perforasomes was 31.1 ± 16.5 mm (range = 2.0–95.0 mm) with an average diameter of 2.8 ± 0.7 mm (range = 1.3–8.8 mm).
A total of 15 cadavers exhibited chimeric anatomy with intact, conjoined arteries and veins allowing for anatomical tracing from the profunda femoris to the distal branches within the tissues of the medial thigh. Dissection and isolation of the common pedicle and distal vessels was feasible with minimal disruption of adjacent tissues. Chimeric flap venous anatomy was favorable, with vena commitante adjacent to the common pedicle in all specimens.
Conclusion Dissection of a chimeric medial thigh flap consisting of both gracilis and PAP flap tissues is feasible in a cadaveric model. The vascular anatomy of this potential flap appears suitable for future utilization in a clinical setting.
Eingereicht: 20. Juli 2020
Angenommen: 21. Dezember 2020
16. Februar 2021 (online)
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
- 1 Hallock GG. Simplified nomenclature for compound flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (04) 1465-1470
- 2 Hallock GG. Further clarification of the nomenclature for compound flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 151e-160e
- 3 Hallock GG. The complete nomenclature for combined perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (04) 1720-1729
- 4 Righini S, Festa BM, Bonanno MC, Colombo V, Luca N. Dynamic tongue reconstruction with innervated gracilis musculocutaneos flap after total glossectomy. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (01) 76-81
- 5 Healy C, Allen Sr RJ. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (02) 121-125
- 6 Franco MJ, Nicoson MC, Parikh RP, Tung TH. Lower extremity reconstruction with free gracilis flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (03) 218-224
- 7 Fernández-Riera R, Hung SY, Wu JC, Tsao CK. Free profunda femoris artery perforator flap as a first-line choice of reconstruction for partial glossectomy defects. Head Neck 2017; 39 (04) 737-743
- 8 Gir P, Cheng A, Oni G, Mojallal A, Saint-Cyr M. Pedicled-perforator (propeller) flaps in lower extremity defects: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (09) 595-601
- 9 Hammond JB, Flug JA, Foley BM. et al. A newly described, highly prevalent arterial pedicle perfuses both gracilis and profunda artery perforator flap tissues: an angiographic study of the medial thigh. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (03) 177-181
- 10 Ciudad P, Maruccia M, Orfaniotis G. et al. The combined transverse upper gracilis and profunda artery perforator (TUGPAP) flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (05) 359-366
- 11 Ciudad P, Dower R, Nicoli F. et al. Pelvic-perineal reconstruction with the combined transverse upper gracilis and profunda artery perforator (TUG-PAP) flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (04) 573-575
- 12 Ciudad P, Manrique OJ, Patel KM, Agko M, Torto FL, Chen HC. Abstract: Applications of the combined transverse upper gracilis and profunda artery perforator (TUGPAP) flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (9, Suppl): 79
- 13 Hupkens P, Westland PB, Ulrich DJO. The combined transverse upper gracilis and profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction—letter to the editor. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (01) 124-125
- 14 Ciudad P, Huang TC, Manrique OJ. et al. Expanding the applications of the combined transverse upper gracilis and profunda artery perforator (TUGPAP) flap for extensive defects. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (04) 316-325
- 15 Hunsinger V, Lhuaire M, Haddad K. et al. Medium-and large-sized autologous breast reconstruction using a Fleur-de-lys Profunda Femoris artery perforator flap design: a report comparing results with the horizontal profunda femoris artery perforator flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (01) 8-14
- 16 Cho MJ, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Classification and management of donor-site wound complications in the profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (02) 110-115