CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2021; 11(03): 113-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723052
Review Article

Etiology and Management of Complications Associated with Sinus Augmentation Procedures

Santhosh B. Shenoy
1   Department of Periodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte (deemed to be) University, Derlakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Avaneendra Talwar
1   Department of Periodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte (deemed to be) University, Derlakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Smitha Shetty
1   Department of Periodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte (deemed to be) University, Derlakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Raghavendra Vamsi Anegundi
1   Department of Periodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte (deemed to be) University, Derlakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Sinus floor elevation is a predictable procedure for vertical bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior maxilla. As with most surgical procedures, complications can be encountered during sinus floor elevation/augmentation. A clinician should have a thorough knowledge of factors that can lead to complications and possible ways to manage. Presurgical evaluation of the sinus is a prerequisite in identifying the concomitant presence of systemic disease and maxillary sinus disease that may lead to postoperative complications. Despite the best efforts, one may encounter adverse events. Complications can broadly be divided into intraoperative, acute, and chronic complications based on the timing of its occurrence. The most commonly encountered complications include membrane perforation and excessive bleeding. Evaluation of anatomic deviations and sound surgical skill is required to reduce intraoperative complications. Prevention is better than cure. It is always better to know how and when a complication might occur so that the clinician might take the necessary steps to avoid it. This article reviews the management of most commonly encountered complications and the best possible ways to manage them.



Publication History

Article published online:
10 February 2021

© 2021. Nitte University (Deemed to be University). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Balaji SM, Balaji P. Comparative evaluation of direct sinus lift with bone graft and zygoma implant for atrophic maxilla. Indian J Dent Res 2020; 31 (03) 389-395
  • 2 Barone A, Santini S, Sbordone L, Crespi R, Covani U. A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21 (01) 81-85
  • 3 Testori T, Weinstein T, Taschieri S, Wallace SS. Risk factors in lateral window sinus elevation surgery. Periodontol 2000 2019; 81 (01) 91-123
  • 4 Larkin JG, Frier BM, Ireland JT. Diabetes mellitus and infection. Postgrad Med J 1985; 61 (713) 233-237
  • 5 Wilson RM. Neutrophil function in diabetes. Diabet Med 1986; 3 (06) 509-512
  • 6 Geerlings SE, Hoepelman AI. Immune dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1999; 26 (3-4) 259-265
  • 7 Fiorellini JP, Chen PK, Nevins M, Nevins ML. A retrospective study of dental implants in diabetic patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20 (04) 366-373
  • 8 Blomqvist JE, Alberius P, Isaksson S, Linde A, Hansson BG. Factors in implant integration failure after bone grafting: an osteometric and endocrinologic matched analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 25 (01) 63-68
  • 9 Fujimoto T, Niimi A, Nakai H, Ueda M. Osseointegrated implants in a patient with osteoporosis: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11 (04) 539-542
  • 10 Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004; 75 (04) 511-516
  • 11 McDermott NE, Chuang SK, Woo VV, Dodson TB. Complications of dental implants: identification, frequency, and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18 (06) 848-855
  • 12 Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13 (Suppl) 11-45
  • 13 Katranji A, Fotek P, Wang HL. Sinus augmentation complications: etiology and treatment. Implant Dent 2008; 17 (03) 339-349
  • 14 Kim J, Jang H. A review of complications of maxillary sinus augmentation and available treatment methods. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 45 (04) 220-224
  • 15 Kim JH, Kim UC, Lee JY, Kim HC, Kim SN. A clinical & radiologic study of bone remodeling effects using rhBMP-2 for maxillary sinus graft. J Dent Implant Res 2016; 35: 46-52
  • 16 Hernández-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19 (01) 91-98
  • 17 Kim YK, Kim JA. Evaluation of factors which affect the prognosis of sinus bone graft and implant placement. J Dent Implant Res 2012; 31: 31-37
  • 18 Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J. A simplified classification and repair system for sinus membrane perforations. J Periodontol 2003; 74 (10) 1534-1541
  • 19 Vlassis JM, Fugazzotto PA. A classification system for sinus membrane perforations during augmentation procedures with options for repair. J Periodontol 1999; 70 (06) 692-699
  • 20 Pikos MA. Maxillary sinus membrane repair: update on technique for large and complete perforations. Implant Dent 2008; 17 (01) 24-31
  • 21 Ragucci GM, Elnayef B, Suárez-López Del Amo F, Wang HL, Hernández-Alfaro F, Gargallo-Albiol J. Influence of exposing dental implants into the sinus cavity on survival and complications rate: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent 2019; 5 (01) 6
  • 22 Ella B, Sédarat C, Noble RdaC. et al. Vascular connections of the lateral wall of the sinus: surgical effect in sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23 (06) 1047-1052
  • 23 Pignataro L, Mantovani M, Torretta S, Felisati G, Sambataro G. ENT assessment in the integrated management of candidate for (maxillary) sinus lift. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2008; 28 (03) 110-119
  • 24 Peñarrocha-Diago M, Maestre-Ferrín L, Cervera-Ballester J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D. Implant periapical lesion: diagnosis and treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17 (06) e1023-e1027
  • 25 Misch CE, Wang HL. Immediate occlusal loading for fixed prostheses in implant dentistry. Dent Today 2003; 22 (08) 50-56
  • 26 Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc 1993
  • 27 Guichet DL, Yoshinobu D, Caputo AA. Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87 (05) 528-535
  • 28 Cehreli MC, Iplikçioglu H. In vitro strain gauge analysis of axial and off-axial loading on implant supported fixed partial dentures. Implant Dent 2002; 11 (03) 286-292