The Impact of Implementing a “Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Bundle” in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Improved Delirium Diagnosis

Abstract

Delirium is associated with significant negative outcomes, yet it remains underdiagnosed in children. We describe the impact of implementing a pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) bundle on the rate of delirium detection in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This represents a single-center, pre-/post-intervention retrospective and prospective cohort study. The study was conducted at a PICU in a quaternary university-affiliated pediatric hospital. All patients consecutively admitted to the PICU in October and November 2017 and 2018. Purpose of the study was describe the impact of the implementation of a PAD bundle. The rate of delirium detection and the utilization of sedative and analgesics in the pre- and post-implementation phases were measured. A total of 176 and 138 patients were admitted during the pre- and post-implementation phases, respectively. Of them, 7 (4%) and 44 (31.9%) were diagnosed with delirium (p < 0.001). Delirium was diagnosed in the first 48 hours of PICU admission and lasted for a median of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–4). Delirium diagnosis was higher in patients receiving invasive ventilation (p < 0.001). Compliance with the PAD bundle scoring was 79% for the delirium scale. Score results were discussed during medical rounds for 68% of the patients in the post-implementation period. The number of patients who received opioids and benzodiazepines and the cumulative doses were not statistically different between the two cohorts. More patients received dexmedetomidine and the cumulative daily dose was higher in the post-implementation period (p < 0.001). The implementation of a PAD bundle in a PICU was associated with an increased recognition of delirium diagnosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this increased diagnostic rate on short- and long-term outcomes.

Keywords

pain - agitation - delirium - bundle - pediatric intensive care units

Publication History

Received: 23 October 2020

Accepted: 24 December 2020

Article published online:
11 February 2021

• References

• 1 Schieveld JNM, Strik JJMH. Pediatric delirium: a worldwide PICU problem. Crit Care Med 2017; 45 (04) 746-747
• 2 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth ed.. Philadelphia, PA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013
• 3 Patel AK, Bell MJ, Traube C. Delirium in pediatric critical care. Pediatr Clin North Am 2017; 64 (05) 1117-1132
• 4 Paterson RS, Kenardy JA, De Young AC, Dow BL, Long DA. Delirium in the critically ill child: assessment and sequelae. Dev Neuropsychol 2017; 42 (06) 387-403
• 5 Traube C, Silver G, Reeder RW. et al. Delirium in critically ill children: an international point prevalence study. Crit Care Med 2017; 45 (04) 584-590
• 6 Traube C, Silver G, Kearney J. et al. Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium: a valid, rapid, observational tool for screening delirium in the PICU*. Crit Care Med 2014; 42 (03) 656-663
• 7 Vet NJ, Ista E, de Wildt SN, van Dijk M, Tibboel D, de Hoog M. Optimal sedation in pediatric intensive care patients: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39 (09) 1524-1534
• 8 Morandi A, Brummel NE, Ely EW. Sedation, delirium and mechanical ventilation: the ‘ABCDE’ approach. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011; 17 (01) 43-49
• 9 Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K. et al; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2013; 41 (01) 263-306
• 10 Trogrlić Z, van der Jagt M, Bakker J. et al. A systematic review of implementation strategies for assessment, prevention, and management of ICU delirium and their effect on clinical outcomes. Crit Care 2015; 19: 157
• 11 Barnes-Daly MA, Phillips G, Ely EW. Improving hospital survival and reducing brain dysfunction at seven California community hospitals: implementing PAD guidelines via the ABCDEF bundle in 6,064 patients. Crit Care Med 2017; 45 (02) 171-178
• 12 Trogrlić Z, van der Jagt M, Lingsma H. et al. Improved guideline adherence and reduced brain dysfunction after a multicenter multifaceted implementation of ICU delirium guidelines in 3,930 patients. Crit Care Med 2019; 47 (03) 419-427
• 13 Simone S, Edwards S, Lardieri A. et al. Implementation of an ICU bundle: an interprofessional quality improvement project to enhance delirium management and monitor delirium prevalence in a single PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2017; 18 (06) 531-540
• 14 Harris J, Ramelet A-S, van Dijk M. et al. Clinical recommendations for pain, sedation, withdrawal and delirium assessment in critically ill infants and children: an ESPNIC position statement for healthcare professionals. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42 (06) 972-986
• 15 Johansson M, Kokinsky E. The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care. Nurs Crit Care 2009; 14 (03) 122-130
• 16 Ista E, van Dijk M, Tibboel D, de Hoog M. Assessment of sedation levels in pediatric intensive care patients can be improved by using the COMFORT “behavior” scale. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005; 6 (01) 58-63
• 17 Manworren RCB, Hynan LS. Clinical validation of FLACC: preverbal patient pain scale. Pediatr Nurs 2003; 29 (02) 140-146
• 18 Bailey B, Daoust R, Doyon-Trottier E, Dauphin-Pierre S, Gravel J. Validation and properties of the verbal numeric scale in children with acute pain. Pain 2010; 149 (02) 216-221
• 19 Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C, Merkel S, Tait AR. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment. Paediatr Anaesth 2006; 16 (03) 258-265
• 20 Kerson AG, DeMaria R, Mauer E. et al. Validity of the Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) in critically ill children. J Intensive Care 2016; 4: 65
• 21 De Cloedt L, Harrington K, Pont-Thibodeau GD, Ducharme-Crevier L. Traduction et validation de l'échelle d'évaluation du delirium pédiatrique de Cornell en version française. Méd Intens Réanim 2019; 28 (05) 418-423
• 22 Traube C, Silver G, Gerber LM. et al. Delirium and mortality in critically ill children: epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric delirium. Crit Care Med 2017; 45 (05) 891-898
• 23 van den Boogaard M, Schoonhoven L, Evers AWM, van der Hoeven JG, van Achterberg T, Pickkers P. Delirium in critically ill patients: impact on long-term health-related quality of life and cognitive functioning. Crit Care Med 2012; 40 (01) 112-118
• 24 Goldberg TE, Chen C, Wang Y. et al. Association of delirium with long-term cognitive decline: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77 (11) 1373-1381
• 25 Kongkiattikul L, Dagenais M, Ruo N, Fontela P, Di Genova T, Zavalkoff S. The impact of a quality improvement project to standardize pain, agitation, and withdrawal assessments on the use of morphine and midazolam in the pediatric intensive care unit. Paediatr Anaesth 2019; 29 (04) 322-330
• 26 Kawai Y, Weatherhead JR, Traube C. et al. Quality improvement initiative to reduce pediatric intensive care unit noise pollution with the use of a pediatric delirium bundle. J Intens Care Med 2017; 34 (05) 383-390
• 27 Malas N, Brahmbhatt K, McDermott C, Smith A, Ortiz-Aguayo R, Turkel S. Pediatric delirium: evaluation, management, and special considerations. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2017; 19 (09) 65
• 28 Shi M, Miao S, Gu T, Wang D, Zhang H, Liu J. Dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence delirium and postoperative behavioral changes in pediatric patients with sevoflurane anesthesia: a double-blind, randomized trial. Drug Des Devel Ther 2019; 13: 897-905
• 29 Kiski D, Malec E, Schmidt C. Use of dexmedetomidine in pediatric cardiac anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2019; 32 (03) 334-342