Inconsistency of Karyotyping and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) in a Mosaic Turner Syndrome Case

Abstract

Purpose Turner syndrome is a sex chromosomal aberration where majority of the patients have 45,X karyotype, while several patients are mosaic involving 45,X/46,XX; 46,X,i(Xq); and other variants. Cytogenetic analysis, karyotyping, is considered to be the “gold standard” to detect numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities. In the recent years, alternative approaches, such as array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), have been widely used in genetic analysis to detect numerical abnormalities as well as unbalanced structural rearrangements. In this study, we report the use of karyotyping as well as aCGH in detecting a possible Turner syndrome variant.

Methods An apparent 16-year-old female was clinically diagnosed as Turner syndrome with premature ovarian failure and short stature. The genetic diagnosis was performed for the patient and the parents by karyotyping analysis. aCGH was also performed for the patient.

Main Findings Cytogenetic analysis of the patient was performed showing variant Turner syndrome (46,X,i(X)(q10)[26]/46,X,del(X)(q11.2)[11]/45,X[8]/46,XX[5]). The patient's aCGH result revealed that she has a deletion of 57,252kb of Xp22.33-p11.21 region; arr[GRCh37] Xp22.33-p11.21 (310,932–57,563–078)X1. Both aCGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results suggested that short stature Homeobox-containing (SHOX) gene, which is located on Xp22.33, was deleted, though FISH result indicated that this was in a mosaic pattern.

Conclusion In the recent years, aCGH has become the preferred method in detecting numerical abnormalities and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements. However, its use is hindered by its failure of detecting mosaicism, especially low-level partial mosaicism. Therefore, although the resolution of the aCGH is higher, the cytogenetic investigation is still the first in line to detect mosaicism.

Keywords

turner syndrome - mosaicism - partial mosaicism - aCGH - cytogenetics

Ethical Approval

The subjects (or their parents or guardians) have given their written informed consent.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' Contributions

P.N., M.C.E., A.A., S.O.S., and S.G.T. participated in the laboratory work, analysis and manuscript writing. E.Y. was involved in evaluating the patient, gynecological examination, and assessment of the required hormonal tests.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. Februar 2021

• References

• 1 Bondy CA. Turner Syndrome Study Group. Care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: a guideline of the Turner Syndrome Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92 (01) 10-25
• 2 Clement-Jones M, Schiller S, Rao E. et al. The short stature homeobox gene SHOX is involved in skeletal abnormalities in Turner syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9 (05) 695-702
• 3 Freriks K, Timmermans J, Beerendonk CC. et al. Standardized multidisciplinary evaluation yields significant previously undiagnosed morbidity in adult women with Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96 (09) E1517-E1526
• 4 Paolucci DG, Bamba V. Turner syndrome: care of the patient: birth to late adolescence. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2017; 14 (Suppl. 02) 454-461
• 5 Gawlik A, Malecka-Tendera E. Transitions in endocrinology: treatment of Turner's syndrome during transition. Eur J Endocrinol 2013; 170 (02) R57-R74
• 6 J. D. Kumara, P. Venkataramana, P. Ramachandrana, P. Subbaraoa and TSA. Turner syndrome with mosaic 45, X (77%)/46, Xr (X) (23%), (Turner mosaic with ring X chromosome): a case report. Sri Ramachandra J Med. 2007;7(01):
• 7 Gardner RJM, Amor DJ. Gardner and Sutherland's Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. 5th edition. Oxford University Press;
• 8 Pham J, Shaw C, Pursley A. et al. Somatic mosaicism detected by exon-targeted, high-resolution aCGH in 10,362 consecutive cases. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 22 (08) 969-978
• 9 Veltman JA, Jonkers Y, Nuijten I. et al. Definition of a critical region on chromosome 18 for congenital aural atresia by arrayCGH. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72 (06) 1578-1584
• 10 Shaw CJ, Stankiewicz P, Bien-Willner G. et al. Small marker chromosomes in two patients with segmental aneusomy for proximal 17p. Hum Genet 2004; 115 (01) 1-7
• 11 Schaeffer AJ, Chung J, Heretis K, Wong A, Ledbetter DH, Lese Martin C. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74 (06) 1168-1174
• 12 Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P. et al. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet 2005; 42 (02) 121-128
• 13 Menten B, Maas N, Thienpont B. et al. Emerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 140 patients and review of published reports. J Med Genet 2006; 43 (08) 625-633
• 14 Cheung SW, Shaw CA, Scott DA. et al. Microarray-based CGH detects chromosomal mosaicism not revealed by conventional cytogenetics. Am J Med Genet A 2007; 143A (15) 1679-1686
• 15 Ballif BC, Rorem EA, Sundin K. et al. Detection of low-level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens. Am J Med Genet A 2006; 140 (24) 2757-2767
• 16 Hook EB. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. Am J Hum Genet 1977; 29 (01) 94-97