Frauenheilkunde up2date, Table of Contents Frauenheilkunde up2date 2016; 10(01): 51-64DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-111670 Gynäkologische Spezialgebiete und Methoden Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New YorkMammasonografie – Teil 1 Regina Fugunt , Michael Golatta , Ines V. Gruber , Christine Solbach , André Farrokh , Markus Hahn , in Kooperation mit dem Arbeitskreis Mammasonografie der DEGUMRecommend Article Abstract Buy Article All articles of this category Full Text References Literatur 1 Madjar H. Kursbuch Mammasonographie. Ein Lehratlas nach den Richtlinien der DEGUM und der KBV. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2005 2 Sozialgesetzbuch. Vereinbarung von Qualitätssicherungsmaßnahmen nach § 135 Abs. 2 SGB V zur Ultraschalldiagnostik (Ultraschall-Vereinbarung) vom 31. 10. 2008 in der Fassung vom 25. 05. 2012. 3 Gruber IV, Rueckert M, Kagan KO et al. Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2013; 13: 328 4 Berg WA, Blume J D, Cormack JB et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography compared to mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer: results of the First-Year Screen in ACRIN 6666. JAMA 2008; 299: 2151-2163 5 Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M et al. Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review. BMC Cancer 2009; 9: 335 6 Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM et al. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 935-940 7 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms, Kurzversion 3.0, AWMF-Registernummer: 032/045OL.. Im Internet: http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/032-045OL_k_S3_Brustkrebs_Mammakarzinom_Diagnostik_Therapie_Nachsorge_2012-07.pdf Stand: 12/2015 8 Athwal RK, Donovan R, Mirza M. Clinical examination allied to ultrasonography in the assessment of new onset gynaecomastia: an observational study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: NC09-11 9 Hahn M, Kuner RP, Scheler P et al. Sonographic criteria for the confirmation of implant rotation and the development of an implant-capsule-interaction (“interface”) in anatomically formed textured breast implants with texturised Biocell-surface. Ultraschall Med 2008; 29: 399-404 10 Würstlein R, Degenhardt F, Duda V et al. Evaluation der DEGUM-Mammasonografiekurse nach objektivierbaren Kriterien. Ultraschall Med 2014; 35: 345-349 11 Krekel NM, Haloua MH, Lopes Cardozo AM et al. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 48-54 12 Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F, Peisker U et al. [Sonoelastography usage among German DEGUM-certified breast ultrasound specialists.]. Ultraschall Med 2014; 35: 59-66 13 Hahn M, Roessner L, Krainick-Strobel U et al. Dignitätskriterien der Mammasonografie unter Anwendung des real-time compound image in Kombination mit dem XRES adaptive image processing. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 270-274 14 Schulze T, Mucke J, Markwardt J et al. Long-term morbidity of patients with early breast cancer after sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to axillary lymph node dissection. J Surg Oncol 2006; 93: 109-119 15 Helms G, Kühn T, Moser L et al. Shoulder-arm morbidity in patients with sentinel node biopsy and complete axillary dissection – data from a prospective randomised trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 696-701 16 Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG). Leitlinienprogramm.. Im Internet: leitlinienprogramm@krebsgesellschaft.de Stand: 12/2015 17 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Im Internet: http://www.ago-online.org Stand: 12/2015 18 Madjar H, Ohlinger R, Mundinger A et al. BI-RADS-anloge DEGUM-Kriterien von Ultraschallbefunden der Brust – Konsensus des Arbeitskreises Mammasonographie der DEGUM. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 374-379 19 Tateishi T, Machi J, Feleppa EJ et al. In vitro B- mode ultrasound criteria for diagnosing axillary lymph node metastasis for breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18: 349-356 20 Bedi DG, Krishnamurthy R, Krishnamurthy S et al. Cortical morphologic features of axillary lymph nodes as a predictor of metastasis in breast cancer: in vitro sonographic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 646-652 21 Koehler KE, Ohlinger R. Sensitivity and specificity of preoperative ultrasonography for diagnosing nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer. Ultraschall Med 2010; 11: 393-399 22 Yang WT, Chang J, Metreweli C. Patients with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes. Radiology 2000; 215: 568-573 23 Choi YJ, Ko EY, Han BK et al. High-resolution ultrasonographic features of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Breast 2009; 18: 119-122 24 Steppan I, Reimer D, Müller-Holzner E et al. Breast cancer in women: evaluation of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 2010; 31: 63-67 25 Gruber I, Hahn M, Fehm T et al. Relevance and methods of interventional breast sonography in preoperative axillary lymph node staging. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 337-343 26 Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K et al. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy – clinical experience in 100 patients. Radiology 2009; 250: 41-49 27 Ueda S, Tsuda H, Asakawa H et al. Utility of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in combination with ultrasonography for axillary staging in primary breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2008; 8: 165 28 Mathijssen IM, Strijdhorst H, Kiestra SK et al. Added value of ultrasound in screening the clinically negative axilla in breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94: 364-367 29 Xin L, Chen L, Zhang H et al. Analysis of detecting value of ultrasound and the clinic-pathological features of axillary metastasis in breast cancer. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2014; 52: 924-928 30 Park YM, Fornage BD, Benveniste AP et al. Strain elastography of abnormal axillary nodes in breast cancer patients does not improve diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional ultrasound alone. Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 1371-1378 31 Xiang D, Hong Y, Zhang B et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) facilitated US in detecting lateral neck lymph node metastasis of thyroid cancer patients: diagnosis value and enhancement patterns of malignant lymph nodes. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 2513-2519
