OP-Journal 2015; 31(03): 142-150
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-109634
Artikel zum Leitthema
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bizepssehnenverletzungen

Injuries of the Biceps Tendon
Sebastian Siebenlist*
,
Arne Buchholz*
,
Peter Biberthaler
,
Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 April 2016 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Neben der Arthrose des Schultergelenks sowie Pathologien des Weichteilmantels der Schulter wie der Rotatorenmanschette wird insbesondere die lange Bizepssehne als Motor des Schulterschmerzes gesehen. Federführende Befunde sind u. a. degenerative Tendinopathien der Sehne, Instabilitäten, Spontanrupturen und auch begleitende Läsionen der Rotatorenmanschette. In den meisten Fällen ist zunächst eine konservative Therapie indiziert. Bei Beschwerdepersistenz sollte eine operative Versorgung in Form einer Tenotomie mit oder ohne Tenodese in Betracht gezogen werden. Hinsichtlich der Wahl des Operationsverfahrens sollte bei jungen schlanken Patienten auf die Erhaltung der Form des Oberarms geachtet werden. Somit erscheint bei der Ruptur der langen Bizepssehne bei diesen Patienten zur Vermeidung einer kosmetischen Deformität die Tenodese sinnvoll. Läsionen der distalen Bizepssehne sind meist traumatisch bedingt und gehen mit einem deutlichen Kraftverlust bei Supination des Unterarms und Flexion im Ellenbogen einher. Die konservative Therapie führt meist zu funktionell unbefriedigenden Ergebnissen, sodass dem Patienten die operative Refixation als Therapie der Wahl empfohlen werden sollte.

Abstract

Along with degenerative arthritis of the shoulder joint and pathologies of the shoulder soft tissues such as rotator cuff lesions, the long head of the biceps tendon presents a common reason for shoulder pain. Leading findings in this context include degenerative tendinopathy, instability, and spontaneous ruptures of the tendon along with associated rotator cuff lesions. In most cases, primary conservative treatment is indicated. If this fails to alleviate the pain, surgical treatment should be considered, including tenotomy with or without tenodesis. When choosing the surgical procedure for young and slim patients, care should be taken to preserve the shape of the upper arm. If such patients suffer from ruptures of the long head of the biceps tendon, they may benefit from tenodesis, which may help to avoid cosmetic deformities. Lesions of the distal biceps tendon are mainly caused by trauma and lead to a significant loss of strength in supination and flexion of the lower arm. Conservative treatment mostly results in unsatisfactory functional outcomes, so surgical treatment should be the treatment of choice.

* S. Siebenlist und A. Buchholz haben zu gleichen Teilen zum vorliegenden Artikel beigetragen.


 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Vangsness jr CT, Jorgenson SS, Watson T et al. The origin of the long head of the biceps from the scapula and glenoid labrum. An anatomical study of 100 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76: 951-954
  • 2 Alpantaki K, McLaughlin D, Karagogeos D et al. Sympathetic and sensory neural elements in the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 1580-1583
  • 3 Berlemann U, Bayley I. Tenodesis of the long head of biceps brachii in the painful shoulder: improving results in the long term. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995; 4: 429-435
  • 4 Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ. The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000; 9: 382-385
  • 5 Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W et al. SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 1990; 6: 274-279
  • 6 Morgan CD, Burkhart SS, Palmeri M et al. Type II SLAP lesions: three subtypes and their relationships to superior instability and rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 1998; 14: 553-565
  • 7 Maffet MW, Gartsman GM, Moseley B. Superior labrum-biceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23: 93-98
  • 8 Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Pritsch M et al. Anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder as a result of pulley lesions: a prospective arthroscopic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 5-12
  • 9 Elser F, Braun S, Dewing CB et al. Anatomy, function, injuries, and treatment of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon. Arthroscopy 2011; 27: 581-592
  • 10 Ben Kibler W, Sciascia AD, Hester P et al. Clinical utility of traditional and new tests in the diagnosis of biceps tendon injuries and superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 1840-1847
  • 11 Armstrong A, Teefey SA, Wu T et al. The efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of long head of the biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 7-11
  • 12 Mariani EM, Cofield RH, Askew LJ et al. Rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 228: 233-239
  • 13 Boileau P, Parratte S, Chuinard C et al. Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions: biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 929-936
  • 14 Gaskill TR, Braun S, Millett PJ. Multimedia article. The rotator interval: pathology and management. Arthroscopy 2011; 27: 556-567
  • 15 Szabo I, Boileau P, Walch G. The proximal biceps as a pain generator and results of tenotomy. Sports Med Arthrosc 2008; 16: 180-186
  • 16 Slenker NR, Lawson K, Ciccotti MG et al. Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 2012; 28: 576-582
  • 17 Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT et al. Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 326-332
  • 18 Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S et al. The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 2005; 21: 1296-1306
  • 19 Buchholz A, Martetschlager F, Siebenlist S et al. Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 2013; 29: 845-853
  • 20 Eames MH, Bain GI, Fogg QA et al. Distal biceps tendon anatomy: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1044-1049
  • 21 Morrey BF, Askew LJ, An KN et al. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 418-421
  • 22 Kannus P, Natri A. Etiology and pathophysiology of tendon ruptures in sports. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997; 7: 107-112
  • 23 Seiler 3rd JG, Parker LM, Chamberland PD et al. The distal biceps tendon. Two potential mechanisms involved in its rupture: arterial supply and mechanical impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995; 4: 149-156
  • 24 Ruland RT, Dunbar RP, Bowen JD. The biceps squeeze test for diagnosis of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 437: 128-131
  • 25 OʼDriscoll SW, Goncalves LB, Dietz P. The hook test for distal biceps tendon avulsion. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35: 1865-1869
  • 26 Chew ML, Giuffre BM. Disorders of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Radiographics 2005; 25: 1227-1237
  • 27 Dellaero DT, Mallon WJ. Surgical treatment of partial biceps tendon ruptures at the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 215-217
  • 28 Klonz A, Reilmann H. [Biceps tendon: diagnosis, therapy and results after proximal and distal rupture]. Orthopade 2000; 29: 209-215
  • 29 Baker BE, Bierwagen D. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. Operative versus non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 414-417
  • 30 Keener JD. Controversies in the surgical treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures: single versus double-incision repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (2 Suppl.) S113-S125
  • 31 Boyd HB, Anderson LD. A method for reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1961; 43: 1041-1043
  • 32 DʼAlessandro DF, Shields jr CL, Tibone JE et al. Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures in athletes. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 114-119
  • 33 Chavan PR, Duquin TR, Bisson LJ. Repair of the ruptured distal biceps tendon: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36: 1618-1624
  • 34 Grewal R, Athwal GS, MacDermid JC et al. Single versus double-incision technique for the repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 1166-1174
  • 35 Forthman CL, Zimmerman RM, Sullivan MJ et al. Cross-sectional anatomy of the bicipital tuberosity and biceps brachii tendon insertion: relevance to anatomic tendon repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 522-526
  • 36 Siebenlist S, Fischer SC, Sandmann GH et al. The functional outcome of forty-nine single-incision suture anchor repairs for distal biceps tendon ruptures at the elbow. Int Orthop 2014; 38: 873-879
  • 37 Kettler M, Lunger J, Kuhn V et al. Failure strengths in distal biceps tendon repair. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35: 1544-1548
  • 38 Siebenlist S, Lenich A, Buchholz A et al. Biomechanical in vitro validation of intramedullary cortical button fixation for distal biceps tendon repair: a new technique. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 1762-1768
  • 39 Van den Bogaerde J, Shin E. Posterior interosseous nerve incarceration with endobutton repair of distal biceps. Orthopedics 2015; 38: e68-71
  • 40 Banerjee M, Shafizadeh S, Bouillon B et al. High complication rate following distal biceps refixation with cortical button. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133: 1361-1366
  • 41 Darlis NA, Sotereanos DG. Distal biceps tendon reconstruction in chronic ruptures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 614-619
  • 42 Snir N, Hamula M, Wolfson T et al. Clinical outcomes after chronic distal biceps reconstruction with allografts. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 2288-2295