Aktuelle Dermatologie 2015; 41(11): 460-467
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-105785
Eine Klinik im Blickpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Diagnostik und Therapie des Melanoms im Wandel der letzten 25 Jahre

Standortbestimmung und AusblickChanges of the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Standards for Malignant Melanoma in the Last 25 YearsState of the Art and Upcoming Advances
H. Starz
1   Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Klinikum Augsburg
2   Labor für Dermatohistologie und Oralpathologie München
,
B.-R. Balda
1   Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Klinikum Augsburg
,
C. Haas
3   Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum Augsburg
,
K.-U. Krämer
1   Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Klinikum Augsburg
,
C. Pfeiffer
1   Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Klinikum Augsburg
,
J. Welzel
1   Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Klinikum Augsburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 November 2015 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Im zurückliegenden Vierteljahrhundert hat sich unser Verständnis maligner Melanome enorm erweitert, und dies führte zu einer Vielzahl neuer Diagnostik- und Behandlungsstrategien.

Nach einer als erfolgreich bewerteten Pilotphase in Schleswig-Holstein wurde wegen der hohen und ständig noch steigenden Hautkrebsinzidenz 2008 die Hautkrebsfrüherkennung auf Kosten der gesetzlichen Krankenkassen deutschlandweit eingeführt.

Die Früherkennung und -beseitigung regionärer Lymphknotenmetastasen von Patienten mit mitteldicken und dicken Hautmelanomen gelang durch die Etablierung und innerhalb weniger Jahre erreichten Optimierung der Sentinel-Lymphonodektomie. Dabei erweist sich zudem die mikromorphometrische Klassifikation des Sentinel-Lymphknotenbefalls als erstrangiges Prognose- und Therapieleitkriterium, etwa für die Indikation zur radikalen Komplettierungsdissektion oder zur adjuvanten Interferon-alpha-Therapie.

In fortgeschrittenen Metastasierungsstadien stehen erstmals erfolgreichere Systemtherapien als die Dacarbazin-Monotherapie zur Verfügung. Bei knapp 50 % der Melanome findet sich in der BRAF-Kinase des MAPK-Signaltransduktionsweges eine aktivierende V600-Mutation, die sich wirksam mit den oral verfügbaren Medikamenten Vemurafenib oder Dabrafenib blockieren lässt. Die so rasch erzielbare Metastasenregression wird durch Kombination mit einem MEK-Inhibitor (z. B. Trametinib) noch nachhaltiger. Von den Immuntherapien erreichten Antikörper gegen die immunbremsenden T-Zell-Rezeptoren CTLA4 und PD-1 die besten Therapieergebnisse. Obwohl es darunter selten zu Vollremissionen kommt, können bei einem Teil der Patienten in fortgeschrittenen Melanomstadien anhaltende Tumorkontrollen erzielt werden. Die höchste Tumorkontrollrate ergab sich in Studien mit der Kombination des PD-1-Antikörpers Nivolumab und des CTLA4-Antikörpers Ipilimumab.

Die sinnvolle Nutzung und Kombination dieser innovativen therapeutischen Eingriffe eröffnet erstmals die Chance, die Melanommortalität trotz weiter steigender Inzidenz zu senken. Schon jetzt zeichnet sich allerdings ab, dass dies nicht ohne präzise Charakterisierung von Melanomsubentitäten sowie die sorgfältige Herausarbeitung von Prognosekriterien gelingen wird. Eine derartig differenzierte Patientenversorgung lässt sich sowohl aus medizinischer als auch ökonomischer Sicht am besten durch interdisziplinäre Kooperation im Rahmen von Hautkrebszentren realisieren.

Abstract

Our knowledge about malignant melanomas has enormously grown within the last 25 years, resulting in a variety of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

The high and still increasing incidence of skin cancer and a successful pilot phase in Northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein) have led to a nation-wide screening program for skin cancer in Germany in 2008, paid by the medicare insurances. Its effects are under evaluation now.

The early recognition and elimination of regional lymph node metastases has been optimized by the sentinel node technique. It is regularly applied for melanomas of intermediate and high Breslow thickness. In addition, the micromorphometric classification of sentinel node metastases represents a first-rank prognosticator and the best indicator whether a completion lymph node dissection is needed and whether adjuvant treatment with interferon-alpha might be helpful or not.

For patients in advanced stages of metastasis, more successful systemic therapies compared with dacarbazin have become available. Nearly 50 % of all cutaneous melanomas have an activating V600 mutation in the BRAF kinase, which is part of the MAPK pathway. Vemurafenib and Dabrafenib are orally given drugs, which block the BRAF activity in case of V600 mutation. They usually achieve a quick regression of metastases in the respective patients, and this effect can be stabilized and prolonged by combining one of the BRAF inhibitors with a MEK inhibitor, e. g. Trametinib. Among the immunotherapies, antibodies against downregulating checkpoint receptors on T cells (CTLA4 and PD-1) have shown the best results. While complete remissions of the metastases were rare, continuing tumor control was achieved in a considerable percentage of the patients. The highest percentage was observed in a trial that combined the PD-1 antibody nivolumab with the CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab.

The rational use of all these innovations and – last not least – the optimized collaboration of multiple disciplines in skin cancer centers open the chance, that the melanoma-related mortality might decrease despite a still growing incidence of melanomas.

For this purpose we must learn to find the best “tailored” therapy for each of the upcoming melanoma subentities and for each of the prognostic categories to be defined.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Bachter D, Balda B-R, Vogt H et al. Die „sentinel“ Lymphonodektomie mittels Szintillationsdetektor. Eine neue Strategie in der Behandlung maligner Melanome. Hautarzt 1996; 47: 754-758
  • 2 Cochran AJ, Balda B-R, Starz H et al. The Augsburg Consensus. Techniques of lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and completion lymphadenectomy in cutaneous malignancies. Cancer 2000; 89: 236-241
  • 3 Starz H, Balda B-R, Krämer KU et al. A micromorphometry-based concept for routine classification of sentinel lymph node metastases and its clinical relevance for patients with melanoma. Cancer 2001; 91: 2110-2121
  • 4 Starz H, Cochran AJ, Balda B-R. Die Sentinel-Lymphonodektomie aus histopathologischer Sicht. Akt Dermatol 2002; 28: 273-278
  • 5 Cochran AJ, Starz H. Pathologic aspects. Part II Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma. In: Cody III HS. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 2002: 79-90
  • 6 Balda B-R, Starz H. Malignant melanoma. In: Katsambas AD, Lotti TM, eds. European Handbook of Dermatological Treatments. 2nd. edition Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2003: 321-329
  • 7 Starz H, Haas CJ, Schulz G-M et al. Tyrosinase RT-PCR as a supplement to histology for detecting melanoma and nevus cells in paraffin sections of sentinel lymph nodes. Mod Pathol 2003; 16: 920-929
  • 8 Starz H. Sentinel-Lymphonodektomie. In: Szeimies RM, Hauschild A, Garbe C, et al. Tumoren der Haut. Grundlagen, Diagnostik, Therapie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2010: 345-359
  • 9 Starz H. Ipilimumab for advanced metastatic melanoma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2012; 12: 981-982
  • 10 Volkenandt M, Schmidt M, Konz B et al. Klinisch epidemiologische Daten von Patienten mit malignen Melanomen aus dem Bereich des Tumorzentrums München von 1977 bis 1997. Hautarzt 1999; 50: 233-242
  • 11 Garbe C, Leiter U. Melanoma epidemiology and trends. Clin Dermatol 2009; 27: 3-9
  • 12 Greinert R, Volkmer B, Wende A et al. Prävention von Hautkrebs. Notwendigkeit, Durchführung und Erfolg. Hautarzt 2003; 54: 1152-1163
  • 13 Balch CM, Soong S, Ross MI et al. Long-term results of a multi-institutional randomized trial comparing prognostic factors and surgical results for intermediate thickness melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm). Intergroup Melanoma Surgical Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 87-97
  • 14 Cascinelli N, Santinami M, Maurichi A et al. World Health Organization experience in the treatment of melanoma. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83: 405-416
  • 15 Balda B-R, Herrmann R. Neoplasien der Haut. In: Huhn D, Herrmann R, Hrsg. Medikamentöse Therapie maligner Erkrankungen. 3. Auflage Stuttgart: Fischer; 1995: 393-405
  • 16 Khan KH, Goody RB, Harneed H et al. Metastatic melanoma: a regional review and future directions. Tumori 2012; 98: 575-580
  • 17 Ugurel S, Paschen A, Becker JC. Dacarbazine in melanoma: from a chemotherapeutic drug to an immunomodulating agent. J Invest Dermatol 2013; 133: 289-292
  • 18 Argenziano G, Giacomel J, Zalaudek I et al. A clinico-dermoscopic approach for skin cancer screening: recommendations involving a survey of the International Dermoscopy Society. Dermatol Clin 2013; 31: 525-534
  • 19 Choudhury K, Volkmer B, Greinert R et al. Effectiveness of skin cancer screening programmes. Brit J Dermatol 2012; 167: 94-98
  • 20 Waldmann A, Nolte S, Weinstock MA et al. Skin cancer screening participation and impact on melanoma incidence in Germany – an observational study on incidence trends in regions with and without population-based screening. Br J Dermatol 2012; 106: 970-974
  • 21 Breitbart EW, Waldmann A, Nolte S et al. Systematic skin cancer screening in Northern Germany. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 60: 201-211
  • 22 Brod C, Schippert W, Breuninger H. Dysplastic nevus syndrome with development of multiple melanomas. A surgical concept for prophylaxis. JDDG 2009; 7: 773-775
  • 23 Zalaudek I, Kittler H, Blum A et al. Who benefits from prophylactic surgical removal of “dysplastic” nevi?. JDDG 2010; 8: 279-280
  • 24 Pellacani G, Cesinaro AM, Seidenari S. Reflectance-mode confocal microscopy of pigmented skin lesions – improvement in melanoma diagnostic specificity. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53: 979-985
  • 25 Pellacani G, Farnetani F, Gonzalez S et al. In vivo confocal microscopy for detection and grading of dysplastic nevi: a pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66: e109-121
  • 26 Virchow R. Dritte Vorlesung. Allgemeine Physiologie der Geschwülste. In: Virchow R. Die krankhaften Geschwülste. Berlin: Hirschwald; 1863: 33-56
  • 27 Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 392-399
  • 28 Giuliano AE, Dale PS, Turner RR et al. Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 394-399
  • 29 Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Kumai K et al. Recent advances in sentinel node navigation for gastric cancer: a paradigm shift of surgical management. J Surg Oncol 2005; 90: 147-151
  • 30 Wawroschek F, Vogt H, Weckermann D et al. Radioisotope guided pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 166: 1715-1719
  • 31 Haas CJ, Wagner T, Wawroschek F et al. Combined application of RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry on paraffin embedded sentinel lymph nodes of prostate cancer patients. Pathol Res Pract 2005; 200: 763-770
  • 32 Starz H, Balda B-R, Bachter D et al. Secondary lymph node involvement from primary large B-cell lymphoma oft he leg: sentinel lymph nodectomy as a new strategy for staging circumscribed cutaneous lymphomas. Cancer 1999; 85: 199-207
  • 33 Düker I, Starz H, Bachter D et al. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of sentinel lymphonodectomy and S-staging in Merkel cell carcinoma. Dermatology 2001; 202: 225-229
  • 34 Krämer K-U, Starz H, Balda B-R. Primary cutaneous CD30-positive large T-cell lymphoma with secondary lymph node involvement detected by sentinel lymphonodectomy. Acta Derm Venereol 2002; 82: 73-74
  • 35 Michl C, Starz H, Bachter D et al. Sentinel lymphonodectomy in nonmelanoma skin malignancies. Br J Dermatol 2003; 149: 763-769
  • 36 Morton DL on behalf of the MSLT Study Group. Overview and update of the phase III multicenter selective lymphadenectomy trials (MSLT-I and MSLT-II) in melanoma. Clin Exp Metastasis 2012; 29: 699-706
  • 37 Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ et al. Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 599-609
  • 38 Starz H, Siedlecki K, Balda B-R. Sentinel lymphonodectomy and S classification. A successful strategy for better predicting and for improving the outcome of melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11 (Suppl. 03) 162S-168S
  • 39 Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation oft he American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3622-3634
  • 40 Fink AM, Weihsengruber F, Spangl B et al. S-classification of sentinel lymph nodes predicts the results of complete lymph node dissection. Melanoma Res 2005; 15: 267-271
  • 41 Van Akkooi ACJ, Nowecki ZI, Voit C et al. Sentinel node tumor burden according to the Rotterdam criteria is the most important prognostic factor for survival in melanoma patients. A multicenter study in 388 patients with positive sentinel nodes. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 949-955
  • 42 Van der Ploeg IM, Kroon BB, Antonini N et al. Comparison of three micromorphometric pathology classifications of melanoma metastases in the sentinel node. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 301-304
  • 43 Veenstra HJ, Brouwer OR, van der Ploeg IM et al. Five-year follow-up of 16 melanoma patients with a Starz I-involved sentinel node in whom completion lymph node dissection was omitted. Melanoma Res 2012; 22: 436-439
  • 44 Migliano E, Bellei B, Govoni FA et al. SLN melanoma micrometastasis predictivity of nodal status: a long term retrospective study. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2013; 32: 47
  • 45 Van der Ploeg AP, van Akkooi AC, Verhoef C et al. Completion lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel node: no longer a must?. Curr Opin Oncol 2013; 25: 152-159
  • 46 Wang X, Heller R, VanVoorhis N et al. Detection of submicroscopic lymph node metastases with polymerase chain reaction in patients with malignant melanoma. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 768-774
  • 47 Blaheta HJ, Ellwanger U, Schittek B et al. Examination of regional lymph nodes by sentinel node biopsy and molecular analysis provides new staging facilities in primary cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 2000; 114: 637-642
  • 48 Howard JH, Thompson JF, Mozzillo N et al. Metastasectomy for distant metastatic melanoma: analysis of data from the first Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I). Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 2547-2555
  • 49 Menzies AM, Haydu LE, Visintin L et al. Distinguishing clinicopathologic features of patients with V600E and V600K BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 3242-3249
  • 50 Starz H, Moody J, Welzel J et al. Melanomas of the head-and-neck skin with mutation BRAF V600K or BRAF V600R define a melanoma subtype with particular clinical features. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: abstr 9098
  • 51 Yaman B, Akalin T, Kandiloglu G. Clinicopathological characteristics and mutation profiling in primary cutaneous melanoma. Am J Dermatopathol 2015; 37: 389-397
  • 52 Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L et al. Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 707-714
  • 53 Young K, Minchom A, Larkin J. BRIM-1, -2 and -3 trials: improved survival with vemurafenib in metastatic melanoma patients with a BRAF(V600E) mutation. Future Oncol 2012; 8: 499-507
  • 54 Hauschild A, Grob JJ, Demidov LV et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicenter open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 380: 358-365
  • 55 Gibney GT, Zager JS. Clinical development of dabrafenib in BRAF mutant melanoma and other malignancies. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2013; 9: 893-899
  • 56 Salama AK, Kim KB. Trametinib (GSK1120212) in the treatment of melanoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2013; 14: 619-627
  • 57 Long GV, Stroyakovskiy DD, Gogas H et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 444-451
  • 58 Becker JC, Bröcker EB, Schadendorf D et al. Imatinib in melanoma: a selective treatment option based on KIT mutation status?. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: e9
  • 59 Faries MB, Morton DL. Therapeutic vaccines for melanoma: current status. BioDrugs 2005; 19: 247-260
  • 60 Eggermont AM, Suciu S, Rutkowski P et al. Adjuvant ganglioside GM2-KLH/QS-21 vaccination versus observation after resection of primary tumor > 1.5 mm in patients with stage II melanoma: results of the EORTC 18961 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3831-3837
  • 61 Eggermont AM, Suciu S, Testori A et al. Long-term results of the randomized phase III trial EORTC 18991 of adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b versus observation in resected stage III melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 3810-3818
  • 62 Hauschild A, Weichenthal M, Rass K et al. Efficacy of low-dose interferon alpha 2a 18 versus 60 months of treatment in patients with primary melanoma of ≥ 1.5 mm tumor thickness: results of a randomized phase III DeCOG trial. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 841-846
  • 63 Pflugfelder A, Kochs C, Blum A et al. S3-guideline “diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of melanoma” -- short version. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2013; 11: 563-602
  • 64 Mocellin S, Pasquali S, Rossi CR et al. Interferon alpha adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 493-501
  • 65 Trinh VA, Hwu WJ. Ipilimumab in the treatment of melanoma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2012; 12: 773-782
  • 66 Wolchok JD, Hodi FS, Weber JS et al. Development of ipilimumab: a novel immunotherapeutic approach fort he treatment of advanced melanoma. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2013; 1291: 1-13
  • 67 Eigentler TK, Schlaak M, Hassel JC et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of ipilimumab: experiences from 198 patients included in a named-patient program in various daily-practice settings and multiple institutions. J Immunother 2014; 37: 374-381
  • 68 Robert C, Soria JC, Eggermont AM. Drug of the year: programmed death-1 receptor/programmed death-1 ligand-1 receptor monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49: 2968-2971
  • 69 Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 122-133
  • 70 Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2006-2017
  • 71 Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 23-34
  • 72 The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Genomic classification of cutaneous melanoma. Cell 2015; 161: 1681-1696
  • 73 Leiter U, Eigentler T, Garbe U. Epidemiology of skin cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014; 810: 120-140
  • 74 Stevenson AD, Mickan S, Mallett S et al. Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for melanoma diagnosis in patients with clinically equivocal skin lesions. Dermatol Pract Concept 2013; 3: 19-27
  • 75 Gambichler T, Schmid-Wendtner MH, Plura I et al. A multicenter pilot study investigating high-definition optical coherence tomography in the differentiation of cutaneous melanoma and melanocytic naevi. JEADV 2015; 29: 537-541
  • 76 Malvehy J, Hauschild A, Curiel-Lewandrowski C et al. Clinical performance of the Nevisense system in cutaneous melanoma detection: an international, multicentre, prospective and blinded clinical trial on efficacy and safety. Br J Dermatol 2014; 171: 1099-1107
  • 77 Bastian BC. The molecular pathology of melanoma: An integrated taxonomy of melanocytic neaoplasia. Ann Rev Pathol Mech Dis 2014; 9: 239-271
  • 78 Eggermont AM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ et al. Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma (EORTC 18071): a randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 522-530
  • 79 Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 6199-6206