Download PDF
Neonatologie Scan 2015; 04(04): 335-350
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-105578
Fortbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Mechanische Beatmung in der Neonatologie

Ulrich H. Thome
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 December 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Corrected by:

Mechanische Beatmung in der NeonatologieNeonatologie Scan 2015; 04(04): 1-1
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569716

See also:

Spezielle Beatmungssituationen in der NeonatologieNeonatologie Scan 2016; 05(01): 47-58
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-107295

Pathophysiologische Grundlagen

Die mechanische Beatmung eines Neugeborenen und insbesondere eines kleinen Frühgeborenen stellt eine besondere Herausforderung dar. Besonders im kranken Zustand, d. h. im Rahmen des Atemnotsyndroms, verträgt die neonatale Lunge nur kleine Tidalvolumina (Abb. [1]). Große Tidalvolumina sind aufgrund der geringen Compliance schwer erreichbar und außerdem schädlich. Aufgrund der lungenmechanisch extremen Situation müssen bei schweren Erkrankungen oftmals die Grenzen der Physik ausgeschöpft werden.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Harris TR et al. Physiologic Principles. In: Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH. Assisted ventilation of the neonate. 3rd ed. Saunders/Elsevier; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 2 The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1301-1308
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bolivar JM, Gerhardt T, Gonzalez A et al. Mechanisms for episodes of hypoxemia in preterm infants undergoing mechanical ventilation. J Pediatr 1995; 127: 767-773
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bernstein G, Mannino FL, Heldt GP et al. Randomized multicenter trial comparing synchronized and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates. J Pediatr 1996; 128: 453-463
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Baumer JH. International randomised controlled trial of patient triggered ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2000; 82: 5-10
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Beresford MW, Shaw NJ, Manning D. Randomised controlled trial of patient triggered and conventional fast rate ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2000; 82: 14-18
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Laffey JG, Kavanagh BP. Hypocapnia. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 43-53
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Thome UH, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, Bohnhorst B et al. Permissive hypercapnia in extremely low birthweight infants (PHELBI): a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3: 534-543
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hummler HD, Engelmann A, Merinsky A et al. Buffering Acidosis During Permissive Hypercapnia To Restore Physiologic pH May Increase the Degree of Lung Injury in Surfactant Deficient Rabbits. Pediatr Acad Soc 2004; 55: 2886
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Hummler H, Schulze A. New and alternative modes of mechanical ventilation in neonates. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 14: 42-48
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Duman N, Tuzun F, Sutcuoglu S et al. Impact of volume guarantee on synchronized ventilation in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1358-1364
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Erdemir A, Kahramaner Z, Turkoglu E et al. Effects of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus pressure support plus volume guarantee ventilation in the weaning phase of preterm infants. Pediatr Crit Care Med J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr Intensive Crit Care Soc 2014; 15: 236-241
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Gizzi C, Montecchia F, Panetta V et al. Is synchronised NIPPV more effective than NIPPV and NCPAP in treating apnoea of prematurity (AOP)? A randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100: 17-23
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics 2013; 131: 1482-1490
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Manley BJ, Owen LS, Doyle LW et al. High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1425-1433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Li W, Long C, Zhangxue H et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and up-date. Pediatr Pulmonol 2015; 50: 402-409
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 700-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1970-1979
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gopel W, Kribs A, Ziegler A et al. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation by surfactant treatment of spontaneously breathing preterm infants (AMV): an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 1627-1634
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kribs A, Roll C, Göpel W et al. Nonintubated Surfactant Application vs Conventional Therapy in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr 2015; published online June 8; DOI DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0504.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Fischer HS, Bührer C. Avoiding endotracheal ventilation to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2013; 132: e1351-e1360
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Czernik C, Schmalisch G, Buhrer C et al. Weaning of neonates from mechanical ventilation by use of nasopharyngeal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: a preliminary study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 374-378
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar